(Treasury):Under the
Terrorist Asset-Freezing etc. Act 2010 (TAFA 2010), the Treasury is
required to prepare a quarterly report regarding its exercise of
the powers conferred on it by Part 1 of TAFA 2010. This written
statement satisfies that requirement for the periods of 1 July 2017
to 30 September 2017 and 1 October 2017 to 31 December 2017.
This report also covers the UK’s implementation of the UN’s ISIL
(Da’esh) and Al-Qaida asset freezing regime (ISIL-AQ), and the
operation of the EU’s asset freezing regime under EU Regulation
(EC) 2580/2001 concerning external terrorist threats to the EU.
(also referred to as the CP 931 regime).
Under the ISIL-AQ asset freezing regime, the UN has
responsibility for designations and the Treasury, through its
Office of Financial Sanctions implementation (OFSI), has
responsibility for licensing and compliance with the regime in
the UK under the ISIL (Da’esh) and Al-Qaida (Asset-Freezing)
Regulations 2011.
Under EU Regulation 2580/2001, the EU has responsibility for
designations and OFSI has responsibility for licensing and
compliance with the regime in the UK under Part 1 of TAFA 2010.
A new EU asset freezing regime under EU Regulation (2016/1686)
was implemented on 22 September 2016. This permits the EU to make
autonomous Al-Qaida and ISIL (Da’esh) listings. Once a
designation is made under this regime it will appear in the table
below.
The annexed tables set out the key asset-freezing activity in the
UK during each quarter.
The Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Bill currently before
Parliament will help ensure that UK counterterrorist sanctions
powers remain a useful tool for law enforcement and intelligence
agencies to consider utilising, while also meeting the UK’s
international obligations.
Under the Bill, a designation could be made where there are
reasonable grounds to suspect that the person or group is or has
been involved in a defined terrorist activity and that
designation is appropriate. This approach is in line with the
UK’s current approach under UN and EU sanctions and would be
balanced by procedural protections such as the ability of
designated persons to challenge the Government in court.