The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care (Mr Jeremy
Hunt) I wish to inform the House of a serious failure that
has come to light in the national breast screening programme in
England. The NHS breast screening programme is overseen by
Public Health England and is one of the most comprehensive in the
world. It screens 2 million people every year, with women between
the ages of 50 and 70...Request free
trial
-
The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care (Mr Jeremy
Hunt)
I wish to inform the House of a serious failure that has come
to light in the national breast screening programme in
England.
The NHS breast screening programme is overseen by Public
Health England and is one of the most comprehensive in the
world. It screens 2 million people every year, with women
between the ages of 50 and 70 receiving a screen every three
years up to their 71st birthday. However, earlier this year
PHE analysis of trial data from the service found that there
was a computer algorithm failure dating back to 2009. The
latest estimates I have received from PHE is that, as a
result, between 2009 and the start of 2018 an estimated
450,000 women aged between 68 and 71 were not invited to
their final breast screening.
At this stage, it is unclear whether any delay in diagnosis
will have resulted in any avoidable harm or death, and that
is one of the reasons I am ordering an independent review to
establish the clinical impact. Our current best
estimate—which comes with caveats, as it is based on
statistical modelling rather than on patient reviews, and
because there is currently no clinical consensus about the
benefits of screening for this age group—is that there may be
between 135 and 270 women who have had their lives shortened
as a result. I am advised that it is unlikely to be more than
this range and may be considerably less. However, tragically,
there are likely to be some people in this group who would
have been alive today if the failure had not happened.
The issue came to light because an upgrade to the breast
screening invitation IT system provided improved data to
local services on the actual ages of the women receiving
screening invitations. This highlighted that some women on
the AgeX trial, set up to examine whether women up to the age
of 73 could benefit from screening, were not receiving an
invitation to their final screen as a 70-year-old. Further
analysis of the data quantified the problem and has found a
number of linked causes, including issues with the system’s
IT and how age parameters are programmed into it. The
investigation also found variations in how local services
send out invitations to women in different parts of the
country.
The existence of a potential issue was brought to the
attention of the Department of Health and Social Care by
Public Health England in January, although at that stage, its
advice was that the risk to patients was limited. Following
that, an urgent clinical evaluation took place to determine
the extent of harm and the remedial measures necessary.
Public Health England escalated the matter to Ministers in
March, with clear clinical advice that the matter should not
be made public. This was to ensure that a plan could be put
in place that ensured any remedies did not overwhelm the
existing screening programme and was able to offer proper
support for affected patients.
I am now taking the earliest opportunity to update the House
on all the remedial measures that have been put in place,
which are as follows. First, urgent remedial work to stop the
failure continuing has now been completed according to the
chief executive of Public Health England. This was finished
by 1 April and PHE is clear that the issue is not now
affecting any women going forward.
Of the estimated 450,000 women who missed invitations to a
scan, 309,000 are estimated to still be alive. Our intention
is to contact all those living within the United Kingdom who
are registered with a GP before the end of May, with the
first 65,000 letters going out this week. Following
independent expert clinical advice, the letters will inform
all those under 72 that they will automatically be sent an
invitation to a catch-up screening. Those aged 72 and over
will be given access to a helpline through which they can get
clinical advice to help them decide whether or not a
screening is appropriate for their particular situation. This
is because for older women, there is a significant risk that
screening will pick up non-threatening cancers that may lead
to unnecessary and harmful tests and treatment. However, this
is an individual choice and in all cases, the wishes of the
patients affected will be followed. By sending all the
letters to UK residents registered with a GP by the end of
May, we hope to reassure anyone who does not receive a letter
this month that they are not likely to have been affected.
It is a major priority to do our very best to make sure that
the additional scans do not cause any delays in the regular
breast screening programme for those under 71, so NHS England
has taken major steps to expand the capacity of screening
services, and has today confirmed that all women affected who
wish to be screened will receive an appointment within the
next six months. Of course, we intend the vast majority to be
much sooner than that.
We have held helpful discussions with the devolved
Administrations to alert them to the issue. Scotland uses a
different IT system, and while the systems in Wales and
Northern Ireland are similar, neither believe they are
affected. However, we are discussing with each of them the
best way to reach women who have moved to another part of the
UK during this period. This is obviously more complicated,
but we are confident that those affected will still be
contacted by the end of May.
In addition, and as soon as possible, we will make our best
endeavours to contact the appropriate next of kin of those we
believe missed a scan and have subsequently died of breast
cancer. As well as apologising to the families affected, we
would wish to offer any further advice they might find
helpful, including the process by which we can establish
whether the missed scan is a likely cause of death and
compensation is therefore payable. We recognise that this
will be incredibly distressing for some families, and we will
approach the issue as sensitively as possible.
Irrespective of when the incident started, the fact is that
for many years, oversight of our screening programme has not
been good enough. Many families will be deeply disturbed by
these revelations, not least because there will be some
people who receive a letter having had a recent diagnosis of
breast cancer. We must also recognise that there may be some
who receive a letter having had a recent terminal diagnosis.
For them and others, it is incredibly upsetting to know that
you did not receive an invitation for screening at the
correct time, and totally devastating to hear you may have
lost or be about to lose a loved one because of
administrative incompetence. So on behalf of the Government,
Public Health England and the NHS, I apologise wholeheartedly
and unreservedly for the suffering caused. But words alone
are not enough. We also need to get to the bottom of
precisely how many people were affected, why it actually
happened and most importantly, how we can prevent it ever
happening again.
Many in this House will also have legitimate questions that
need answering: why did the algorithm failure occur in the
first place, and how can we guarantee it does not happen
again? Why did quality assurance processes not pick up the
problem over a decade or more? Were there any warnings,
written or otherwise, which should have been heeded earlier?
Was the issue escalated to Ministers at the appropriate time?
What are the broader patient safety lessons for screening IT
systems?
I am therefore commissioning an independent review of the NHS
breast screening programme to look at these and other issues,
including its processes, IT systems and further changes and
improvements that can be made to the system to minimise the
risk of any repetition. The review will be chaired by Lynda
Thomas, chief executive of Macmillan Cancer Support, and
Professor Martin Gore, consultant medical oncologist and
professor of cancer medicine at the Royal Mardsen, and is
expected to report in six months.
The NHS has made huge progress under Governments of both
sides of this House on improving cancer survival rates, which
are now at their highest ever. Seven thousand people are
alive today who would not have been if mortality rates had
remained unchanged from 2010, but this progress makes system
failures even more heartbreaking when they happen. Today,
everyone in this House will be thinking of families up and
down the country who are worried that they may have been
affected by this failure. We cannot give all the answers
today, but we can commit to take all the necessary steps to
give people the information that they need as quickly as
possible. Most of all, we want to be able to promise that
this will not happen again, so today, the whole House will be
united in our resolve to be transparent about what went wrong
and to take the necessary actions to learn from the mistakes
made. I commend this statement to the House.
12.58 pm
-
(Leicester South)
(Lab/Co-op)
I thank the Secretary of State for advance sight of his
statement and for his personal courtesy in directly
briefing me as well. The thoughts of the whole House are
with those whose screening was missed and who sadly lost
their lives from breast cancer, or who have subsequently
developed cancer. Anyone who has had a loved one taken by
breast cancer, or indeed any cancer, will know of the great
pain and anguish of that loss. I understand that the
Secretary of State has referred to estimates, but when the
facts are established, will he assure us that each and
every case will be looked into sensitively and in a timely
manner? Our thoughts also turn to the 450,000 women who
were not offered the screening that they should have had,
so I welcome the Secretary of State’s commitment to contact
the 309,000 women who are estimated to be still alive.
Early detection and treatment are vital to reducing breast
cancer mortality rates, which is why the AgeX pilots were
established in 2009 and rolled out nationally from late
2010, when the Government expanded the screening programme.
Given the problems that Public Health England has
identified with its randomisation algorithm for those
trials, will the Secretary of State tell us whether any
evaluations and assessments of those pilots had been done
by the Department before the national roll-out of the
programme?
I welcome the Secretary of State’s candour in questioning
why this problem was not picked up—eight years is a long
time for an error of this magnitude to go undetected. Did
the Department receive any warnings in that time? Is there
any record of how many women raised concerns that they had
not received the appropriate screening? Were there any
missed opportunities to correct this mistake? He said
graciously that oversight of the screening programme was
not good enough. How does he intend to improve that
oversight? What other trials are in place across the NHS
and is he satisfied with their oversight?
We welcome the establishment of the national inquiry. Will
it be hosted and staffed by the Department of Health or
another Department? In the interests of transparency, will
the Secretary of State place in the Library the Public
Health England analysis from this year that identified the
problem with the algorithm? Although the parallels are not
exact, where the NHS offers bowel cancer screenings for
women between the ages of 60 and 74 and cervical cancer
screenings for women up to 64, what assurances can he give
that the systems supporting those services are running
properly, and what checks are being carried out to make
sure that nobody misses out on screenings for other
cancers?
The Secretary of State says that NHS England will take
steps to expand the capacity of screening services. Will he
say a little more about that? What extra resources will be
made available to help the NHS provide the extra screening
now needed? He will know that the NHS faces huge workforce
pressures—according to Macmillan, there are more than 400
vacancies in cancer nursing, the Royal College of
Radiologists has found that 25% of NHS breast screening
programme units are understaffed, and there are vacancies
for radiographers too. Will he assure us that the NHS will
have the staff to carry out this extra work, and may I
gently suggest that, if it needs extra international cancer
staff, he ensures that the Home Office does not block their
visas?
More broadly, does the Secretary of State share my concerns
that screening rates are falling generally? The proportion
of women aged 50 to 70 taking up routine breast screening
invitations fell to 71.1% last year—the lowest rate in the
last decade. There is also a wide regional variation in
screening rates. The number of women attending breast
screening in England is as low as 55.4% in some areas, and,
as the all-party group on breast cancer found, there are
stark inequalities in NHS services in England, with women
in the worst-affected areas more than twice as likely to
die from breast cancer under the age of 75. Beyond the
problems identified today, what more are the Government
doing to make sure that screening rates rise again so that
cancer care for patients is the best it can be?
Finally, many of our constituents over whom breast cancer
has cast a shadow will feel anxious and worried tonight.
Members on both sides of the House want to see cancer
prevented and those who have it fully supported.
Transparency and clarity are vital. Will the Secretary of
State undertake to keep the House fully informed of
developments to offer our constituents the peace of mind
they deserve?
-
Mr Hunt
I thank the hon. Gentleman for his constructive tone, and I
want to reassure him that each and every case will be
looked at in detail. The sad truth is that we cannot
establish whether not being invited to a screen might have
been critical for someone without looking at their
individual case notes, and in some cases, sadly,
establishing a link will mean looking at the medical case
notes of someone who has died.
It is important to explain that the reason for these
estimates, which are much broader than we would like, is
that there is no clinical consensus about the efficacy of
breast screening for older women. As I understand it, that
is because the incidences of cancers among older women are
higher, but a higher proportion of them are not malignant
or life-threatening, which makes it particularly difficult.
It is also the case that breast cancer treatment has
improved dramatically in recent years and so it is less
important than it was to pick up breast cancer early. None
the less, we believe it will have made a difference to some
women, which is why it is such a serious issue.
The evaluations of the AgeX trial, which brought this to
light at the start of the year, have been continued by
Oxford University throughout the trial period. I am not
aware of any evaluations shared with the Department that
could have brought this problem to light, but obviously the
inquiry will look into that. We need to find ways to
improve oversight, and modern IT systems can greatly
improve safety and reliability—in fact it was during the
upgrading of the IT system that this problem was brought to
light.
I will share with the hon. Gentleman the advice the
Department received from Public Health England in January,
which was the first time we were alerted to the issue, and
we will certainly provide any extra resources the NHS needs
to undertake additional cancer screening. One of our
biggest priorities is that women between the ages of 50 and
70, when the screens are of their highest clinical value,
do not find their regular screens delayed by the extra
screening we do to put this problem right. He is right that
one thing that has come to light is the regional variation
in how the programme is operated. It was previously
operated by the old primary care trusts, under the
supervision of strategic health authorities, and then
brought under the remit of Public Health England, but the
regional variations have continued for a long time, so this
problem will be worse in some parts of the country than in
others. I undertake to keep the House fully informed.
-
(Totnes) (Con)
I thank the Secretary of State for the commitments and
actions he has set out. Colleagues across the House will be
thinking of the hundreds of thousands of women not called
for their final screening test. They now need consistent,
high-quality, evidence-based guidance so that they can make
an informed choice about whether to take up the offer of
screening. There is much material available setting out
pictorially and clearly how they can weigh up the risks and
benefits. Will he assure the House not only that a helpline
will be in place but that it will be backed up with
high-quality material available directly to patients and
their GPs, many of whom will be directly counselling women
following this news?
-
Mr Hunt
Yes, and I can reassure my hon. Friend that GPs will be
briefed and that people will be referred for additional
support to clinically trained staff at Macmillan Cancer
Support and Breast Cancer Care. We have to be transparent
with patients, however, about the absence of a clear
clinical consensus on the efficacy of scanning for women in
their 70s. The fairest thing is to explain that different
people have different views and allow them to come to an
individual choice, and that is what we are doing. It will
of course cause considerable distress to those given that
dilemma, but if anyone wants a scan, we will do that scan.
-
Dr (Central Ayrshire)
(SNP)
I thank the Secretary of State for my advance briefing,
but, as a breast surgeon and co-chair of the all-party
group on breast cancer, I gently take issue with his
comment that we do not need to diagnose breast cancer early
because of the changes in treatment. I would not like that
message to stand: diagnosing early is still crucial.
Obviously this is horrendous for the women involved, but it
will also create anxiety for women who are not aware
whether they are involved and who might not have been part
of the trial. Reassuring them will be a challenge. I
welcome the independent review into how it happened and how
it went so long without being picked up, and I am
interested to know what will happen with the trial now—the
loss of almost 500,000 women from it might have a major
impact.
Given the normal pick-up rate of breast screening,
approximately 2,500 cancers would have been picked up
across England in the last round. As the Secretary of State
says, this issue did not apply in Scotland, but some of the
women affected might have moved and settled in Scotland, so
when did he inform the Scottish Government?
He said that the Department knew in January. As far as I
can establish, officers in Scotland were informed of a
minor issue in March, were told only last week that it was
actually more major, and were not told that it might affect
women who now live in Scotland. There has clearly been
preparation and talk about funding in England, but how many
women who live in Scotland have been identified, and what
efforts have been made to track them down? What
preparations for funding or the expansion of services have
been made for Scotland and, indeed, for the other devolved
nations?
As was mentioned by the hon. Member for Leicester South
(Jonathan Ashworth), radiology, and particularly breast
radiology, is a huge shortage specialty. What funds will be
provided to ensure that it can be delivered without messing
up the normal system?
Will women who do not receive a letter in the next few
weeks be able to telephone, or can the Secretary of State
really guarantee that if they have not heard by the end of
the month, they are clear? As a doctor, I find that a bit
scary.
-
Mr Hunt
The hon. Lady has asked some important questions. I am
sorry if what I said was not clear, but I do not think I
said that there was no need to diagnose early. It is
obviously incredibly important for cancer to be diagnosed
as early as possible. What I said was that I had been
advised that in many cases, because of advances in breast
cancer treatment, it would not make a difference to the
particular women affected in this case. I fully accept that
in some cases it will, and of course it is very important
to diagnose all cancers as early as possible.
I will find out from Oxford university the dates on which
it expects to report the full outcome of the AgeX trial.
Obviously we all want to hear the results as soon as
possible. I will also inform the hon. Lady of the exact
date on which Scottish Government officials were informed.
Let me reassure her that if there are any additional costs
to the Scottish health system, it will of course be
recompensed.
We do not think that major pressures will be created in the
Scottish screening programme, and we are confident that we
will be able to contact everyone in the UK who is
registered with a GP—whether in Scotland, Wales, Northern
Ireland or England—by the end of May. We have had very
productive discussions with Scottish officials about the IT
exchange that will be necessary to ensure that women living
in Scotland also receive their letters by the end of May.
We cannot guarantee that every single one of them will have
been contacted by then—some will have moved abroad, and
some will not be registered with a GP for whatever
reason—but we think that we can contact the vast majority,
and the helpline will be open for anyone to call if they
think they may have been affected.
-
Mr (Ludlow) (Con)
I think that Members on both sides of the House have
appreciated the measured way in which my right hon. Friend
has come to the House and revealed detailed commitments to
helping the women who have suffered as a result of this
terrible, unfortunate IT event. I also think that the
measured response from the hon. Member for Leicester South
(Jonathan Ashworth) properly reflected the concern that
everyone shares.
My right hon. Friend referred to additional screening
capacity to ensure that there is no impact on other,
younger women. What undertakings can he give to any women
who have been affected, and who find that they are
suffering from a malignant growth in their breast, that
they will be able to receive the appropriate treatment as
rapidly as possible?
-
Mr Hunt
I thank my hon. Friend for the work that he did on cancer
when he was working at the Department of Health, and for
his broader work in supporting the hospital sector. He is
absolutely right: additional people will come forward for
treatment, so one of the other matters that we have been
looking into is our treatment capacity. We certainly intend
to ensure that people are treated within the normal short
period if a cancer is detected, and the first step in that
process is to ensure that everyone has a scan in the next
six months. During that period, we will make certain that
they are able to look forward to the same rapid treatment
that all other people whose cancers are detected can be
confident of receiving.
-
Dr (Stockton South)
(Lab)
We have an ethical duty to get screening right, because we
are inviting well people into our health service and
offering them an intervention. May I ask the Secretary of
State whether the uptake of screening by 68 to 71-year-olds
during the period concerned was any lower than expected? If
it was less than expected, why was that not properly
analysed?
-
Mr Hunt
I do not know the answer to that question, but I will look
into it. If we find that the uptake was lower than expected
in that age group, it will be a very important clue about
something that may have gone wrong, and I am sure that the
review panel will want to examine it. The overall uptake
rate is about 80%, but I agree with the hon. Gentleman that
we should look into what the rates were in specific age
cohorts.
-
Mrs (Basingstoke)
(Con)
I thank the Secretary of State for his measured statement,
and for all he is doing to ensure that the women affected
are given the treatment and support that they need. I
particularly welcome his independent review of the NHS
screening programme. Will he also be looking at quality
assurance programmes more widely within the NHS in relation
to screening programmes? It is deeply worrying that the NHS
did not identify this error for more than a decade, and
there may be a need to review those programmes.
-
Mr Hunt
I am afraid that my right hon. Friend is absolutely right.
The truth is that we do have a quality assurance programme,
and it failed to pick up this problem for far too long. We
need to understand why that happened. We think that a
single IT mistake was made at the very start of the
programme, and we understand that sometimes such mistakes
are devilishly difficult to identify. None the less, as was
suggested by the hon. Member for Stockton South (Dr
Williams), there must have been clues that could have been
picked up—or so one would think—and we need to get to the
bottom of that.
-
(Liverpool, Wavertree)
(Lab/Co-op)
I think that anyone who listened to the statement will be
devastated and appalled to learn about this fatal failure,
especially given that the UK’s breast cancer survival rate
is below the EU average. The Secretary of State talked
about the advice line that might be available to people who
had been affected, but has he given any consideration to
any emotional or mental health support that should be
extended to those people and their families?
-
Mr Hunt
We are indeed talking to the charities operating in this
sector about how we can best provide all kinds of support,
including mental health support, as well as clinical
guidance. We often talk in the House about the challenges
facing the NHS, but it is important to note that breast
cancer is an area in which survival rates have been
improving, and have actually been catching up with those in
other European countries. The NHS deserves great credit for
that, despite today’s very serious failing.
-
(South West
Wiltshire) (Con)
I commend my right hon. Friend for the way in which he
brought this very bad news to the House, and the hon.
Member for Leicester South (Jonathan Ashworth) for the way
in which he responded to it.
As my right hon. Friend will know, breast cancer is not
just about survival nowadays; it is also about quality of
life after treatment. Will his contact with those who have
been affected extend to those who have been treated, but
who may have had to be treated in a more radical way than
might have been the case had their cancers been picked up
earlier?
-
Mr Hunt
Absolutely. As my hon. Friend will know from his own
medical background, it is impossible to know that until
there is a detailed case note review, but we will certainly
undertake that review for anyone who thinks they may have
been affected.
-
Dr (Sleaford and North
Hykeham) (Con)
I thank my right hon. Friend for his statement and for the
work he is doing to ensure that women who are affected are
supported and treated promptly, but what is he doing to
ensure that people who are due for cervical and other NHS
screening programmes are being properly called, and can he
tell women who are affected—and, no doubt, very worried
today—what they should do now? Whom should they call,
should they be waiting for a letter, and how soon can they
expect a scan if they wish to have one?
-
Mr Hunt
According to the advice that I have received so far, there
is no read-across to other screening programmes, but
obviously the independent review panel will look into that
as it seeks to examine all aspects of the issue. We have
made the commitment today that we will invite for scans all
those who either should be scanned or should consider
whether they wish to have a scan, and will offer them a
date before the end of October, although we hope that in
the vast majority of cases it will be much sooner than
that.
-
(Cynon Valley) (Lab)
What conversations has the Secretary of State had with the
Welsh Secretary? Having long since passed the ages he
mentioned, I certainly was never invited for a screening; I
had to ask for one, and I eventually got the screening in
England.
-
Mr Hunt
We have not had conversations at ministerial level, but we
have had conversations at official level. The Welsh
Administration do not believe this problem has affected
them, even though Wales was using the same IT system we
were using in England. Our concern is about people living
in England who are registered with a Welsh GP or people
living in Wales registered with an English GP. That is why
we are having constructive discussions to share IT
information and make sure everyone in England or Wales
registered with a GP will get that letter.
To respond to the earlier question about what people should
do now, anyone is free to call the helpline number, which
will be made public today, but we are hoping to get the
letters out as quickly as possible over the next four
weeks, during the month of May, so that everyone can be
pretty confident that they are okay if they have not
received one of those letters.
-
(Lewes) (Con)
I welcome the Secretary of State’s announcement today that
there will be an independent review; it is important that
women have confidence in the screening programme. As
someone who worked in breast cancer for over 10 years
before being elected, I gently say to women that the
screening mammogram is just one tool in the early detection
of breast cancer and that if they notice a change in the
interval of three years between mammograms they must seek
medical advice. Also, not all mammograms pick up breast
cancers, so they must not just rely on screening
mammograms.
-
Mr Hunt
I thank my hon. Friend for her excellent advice, which
gives me the opportunity to repeat that the advice for
women about looking after their breasts and making sure
they are alert to potential breast cancer remains
unchanged. All women should take great care over this and
should always come forward to see their GP or local cancer
service if they have any concerns or doubts.
-
(Wigan) (Lab)
I thank the Secretary of State for his statement. There is
no other way to describe what has happened than utterly,
utterly heart-breaking, and it is hard to imagine what some
of the worst affected families will be going through over
the next few weeks.
I am grateful to the Secretary of State for his assurance
that capacity will be expanded to ensure that women can now
access screening, but unless he puts further resources into
the system, other people will go to the back of the queue
as a consequence. In my region of the north-west, one in
five posts are currently vacant, and for far too many women
in this country where they live currently determines
whether they live or die. So will the Secretary of State
put in the additional resources needed to make sure all
women can get the screening they need when they need it?
-
Mr Hunt
I thank the hon. Lady for her comments. We have many other
occasions to have a broader discussion about resourcing of
the NHS, but I recognise what she says: in the specific
situation we are in now, with the people who will need
additional scans and additional treatments over and above
what the NHS would have otherwise done, we will need to
find additional resources to make sure others are not
disadvantaged.
-
Mr (Forest of Dean)
(Con)
May I add my words of support to the Secretary of State for
the way he has approached this issue, and for the way in
which Opposition Members have done so too?
On the scope of the independent review, will it look at
other screening programmes? It might be the case that this
particular issue is not replicated, but I think people will
want assurances about other screening programmes. Also, as
the NHS looks to use IT as a powerful way to combat illness
and disease, will the Secretary of State make sure that
appropriate checks are in place so that there are proper
assurances in the system and these kinds of problems do not
arise in the future?
-
Mr Hunt
My right hon. Friend is absolutely right, and I assure him
that the review being done by Lynda Thomas, one of the most
senior cancer campaigners in the country, and Professor
Gore, one of the most senior oncologists in the country,
will look at what lessons can be learned for the entire
cancer programme, and not just at the specific issue of why
this particular IT problem occurred.
-
(Kingston upon Hull
North) (Lab)
The statement the Secretary of State has made today is
truly shocking, and many women and their families will be
very worried this afternoon. The Secretary of State said
that it is estimated that 309,000 women in this group are
still alive and that the first 65,000 letters are going out
this week. Why are the letters not going out this afternoon
to all 309,000 women? Why are we having to wait until the
end of May to put at rest the minds of these women and
their families?
-
Mr Hunt
That is a reasonable question, and I assure the hon. Lady
that we are sending these letters out as quickly as we
possibly can, but we felt that, even though we are not able
to send them all out this afternoon—for example, because we
have to reconcile with the clinical databases in Scotland,
Wales and Northern Ireland for women who have moved to
those areas and that is going to take place later this
month—it was important to come to the House as soon as
possible, without delay, to inform Members that this was
happening. There will be a period of a few weeks during
which people will have to wait to see if they get one of
the letters, and we fully appreciate that that will cause a
lot of worry to the women involved.
-
Sir (East Devon) (Con)
This is a good time to pay tribute to all the excellent
cancer support charities, counselling services, Maggie’s
centres and so forth up and down the country. I am
reassured that the Secretary of State has said he will be
working with them, but will he commit this afternoon to
contacting all these charities proactively and providing
them with the resources they need to meet what will
obviously be an increased demand over the coming weeks and
months?
-
Mr Hunt
That is a good point, and we will get in touch with all the
cancer charities that we think are going to be affected by
what has happened and make sure they have the support they
need.
-
(Halton) (Lab)
When did the Secretary of State or the Minister with direct
responsibility for screening last ask their officials about
the accuracy of the screening programme and the robustness
of the checks and assurances in place to ensure it was
working properly and efficiently? When, before January this
year, did he last ask his officials that?
-
Mr Hunt
I will have to get back to the hon. Gentleman with a
detailed answer to that question. Ministers were informed
of this issue in March, and we are responsible, as
Ministers, for the effective functioning of that system—as
all Ministers have responsibility for their various
areas—so one of the questions we need to ask is whether the
right escalation procedures and checks and balances were in
place so that Ministers could be informed if there was
likely to be a problem.
-
Dame (Meriden)
(Con)
My constituency has many breast cancer sufferers who were
victims of the rogue surgeon Mr Paterson, so I thank my
right hon. Friend for setting up an inquiry chaired by the
, in which
victims feel properly listened to, and, most importantly,
are being compensated. Will any of the women caught up in
this current situation who have potentially been harmed be
eligible for compensation?
-
Mr Hunt
I thank my right hon. Friend for suggesting the as a good
person to help in the Paterson review, and the answer to
her question is yes: if, because of a failing by the NHS,
harm has happened, then people will be eligible for
compensation, and we will do all the necessary work to
establish whether that is the case.
-
(Scunthorpe) (Lab)
Breast cancer screening makes a real difference to the
outcomes for breast cancer patients by diagnosing early, so
I applaud the Secretary of State for saying he is going to
look at ways of improving performance in this area across
the country, but what is he going to do to try to make
women who have moved out of the UK who might be affected
aware of what has happened?
-
Mr Hunt
We will look at whether we are able to get in contact with
people and will get in contact whenever we can, but there
is of course a helpline through which anyone can contact
us. It is also important to say that, according to the
advice I have received, missing the final screening will in
many cases not make a difference to a patient’s cancer or
the treatment they receive, but we will do everything we
can to support everyone who thinks they might have been
affected.
-
(New Forest East)
(Con)
While it will be for the review to investigate and report
on why the fault with the algorithm was not discovered
earlier, can the Secretary of State throw any more light on
the circumstances in which it eventually came to be
discovered? He said, for example, that it was in the course
of a computer upgrade. Obviously, the circumstances that
led to its discovery could be a pointer towards greater
safeguards for the future.
-
Mr Hunt
That is a very good point. The original issue—or the
original potential issue—was identified by people working
on the AgeX trial for Oxford University, who then brought
it to the attention of Public Health England in early
January. One of the issues seems to have been the confusion
about whether the scans stopped when someone turned 70 or
whether they should carry on until their 71st birthday.
That is why we think the original coding error happened,
but obviously this is a matter for the review, and we need
to learn everything from it.
-
(North Down)
(Ind)
This is a hugely upsetting and serious issue, and I commend
the Secretary of State for the great compassion and
sensitivity with which he has delivered this very bad news
for women throughout the United Kingdom. He mentioned the
fact that the Northern Ireland breast screening scheme was
slightly different, but he will appreciate that he
absolutely must say more to reassure women in Northern
Ireland at this time because we have no Health Minister.
May we please have more reassurance for women in Northern
Ireland?
-
Mr Hunt
I thank the hon. Lady for making that fair and important
point. I will make a special effort in the case of Northern
Ireland to understand what the situation is and to ensure
that it is publicised to the people of Northern Ireland.
Absent politicians are able to do that.
-
(South Leicestershire)
(Con)
I also thank the Secretary of State for his measured and
sensitive tone in delivering this afternoon’s statement. He
mentioned that the figures of 450,000 and 309,000 were
estimates. What is not an estimate, however, is that 65,000
letters will be going out at the end of this month. Will he
assure us that his team in the Department will write to
Members of Parliament to indicate the number of women
affected in each constituency, so that we can prepare for
the inevitable contacts that constituents will make with
us?
-
Mr Hunt
I am very happy to make that commitment.
-
(Heywood and Middleton)
(Lab)
I hope that the independent review will investigate this,
but is the Secretary of State aware of any instances of GPs
inquiring why patients who should have had a final breast
screen were not invited to have one?
-
Mr Hunt
That is a very good question. I am not aware of any such
instances, but that is exactly what we want to look at in
the review. It does seem strange that people who were
expecting to be invited did not come forward, and that
their not receiving an invitation did not set any hares
running. That is one of the things that we need to look at.
-
Sir (New Forest West)
(Con)
How many cancers are detected for every 10,000 screenings,
and what is the clinical consensus on the effectiveness of
that?
-
Mr Hunt
My right hon. Friend is testing my clinical knowledge here;
there will be other people in the Chamber who are better
able to answer that question. I am ready to be corrected by
eminent experts on this, but my understanding is that, in
relation to women in their 70s, for every 1,000 women there
are around 12 cancers, and of those 12 cancers, around
three are potentially life-threatening.
-
(Eastbourne) (LD)
Let us be clear that this is an utterly desperate
situation. We know that some women may well have died who
might not have done had they been identified. However, I
would like to pay tribute to the Secretary of State’s
statement. It was transparent, it ’fessed up and it made
clear what the Department of Health and Social Care would
be doing to remedy the situation. I appreciate that. What
will the Department do to raise awareness of breast cancer
screening among women who are not currently registered with
a GP?
-
Mr Hunt
That is an important question. We have the Be Clear on
Cancer campaign, which is a national advertising campaign
but, as my hon. Friend the Member for Lewes (Maria
Caulfield) said, it is important for people to recognise
that, if we are going to protect them from cancer, they
will have to take an active and proactive role in detecting
any cancers they might have. Important though the screening
service might be, they cannot rely on the screening
service, because their own experience of how their own body
is functioning is the most important detection method of
all.
-
(Harrogate and
Knaresborough) (Con)
I thank my right hon. Friend for his statement, and for the
urgency and sensitivity with which he is treating this
issue. Women all over the country will be very anxious at
hearing this news. Will he guarantee that all women who did
not get invited for their scan will now be guaranteed their
screening?
-
Mr Hunt
We are absolutely guaranteeing that all women affected who
are still alive will be invited to have a screening if they
want it. Only those under 72 will automatically be sent a
date and time for their screening. Those over 72 will be
invited to talk to the helpline so that they can form a
judgment as to whether a screening is appropriate, but
anyone who wants one will get one.
-
Dr (East Kilbride,
Strathaven and Lesmahagow) (SNP)
I should like to thank the Secretary of State for his
comprehensive response. Can he advise me how many women who
have moved to Scotland might be affected? If not, will he
work double time to ensure that those who have been
affected and who have moved to Scotland will get their
letters timeously within the correct period?
-
Mr Hunt
I believe that the IT work, which is a collaboration
between the Scottish NHS and the English NHS, will be
completed in the week of 15 May. That is why we are
confident that we will be able to get the letters out to
people registered with Scottish GPs who have moved from
England by the end of May, which is the same timescale as
for getting the letters out to people living in England. We
will then know that number, and I will of course let the
hon. Lady know.
-
(Chippenham)
(Con)
My grandmother died of breast cancer a few years ago, and
my heart goes out to all the women affected by this fatal
IT malfunction. I welcome my right hon. Friend’s assurance
that he is going to do everything he possibly can to ensure
that this does not happen again. Has any consideration been
given to the impact of this on GP surgeries? I expect that,
during the next few days while women wait for their
letters, they might make appointments with their GPs in
anticipation, and in fear.
-
Mr Hunt
Yes, we are briefing all GP surgeries and all GPs about
what the appropriate response is, because we recognise that
that might happen. Of course, GPs are there for people to
talk to at any time if they have concerns, and some people
may choose to do that. We have also set up a specialist
helpline that will be open seven days a week from 8 am to 8
pm, where people will be able to get advice straightaway by
picking up the phone. We think that that will be the most
practical option for most people.
-
Several hon. Members rose—
-
Mr Speaker
Order. As colleagues know, I like to call everyone on
statements, and I do not wish to make an exception today,
but I remind the House that we also have a ten-minute rule
motion and a very heavily subscribed Opposition-day debate.
In pledging to try to get all remaining colleagues in, I
ask them to do us all the great favour of being extremely
brief. I am sure that Mr Shannon has in mind just a short
sentence without any preamble or subordinate clauses.
-
(Strangford) (DUP)
I thank the Secretary of State for his statement and for
his compassion and care. Is he aware of any discussions on
the continued alignment with the European Medicines
Agency’s drug licensing process to ensure that our breast
cancer patients, and indeed all cancer patients, have
access to the benefits of the European trials and the
ability of UK citizens to participate in clinical trials?
This is very important.
-
Mr Hunt
That is a slightly different topic, but we have no greater
priority than to ensure that Brexit does not interrupt the
cancer care of UK patients.
-
Several hon. Members rose—
-
Mr Speaker
The hon. Member for Bexhill and Battle (Huw Merriman) will
be a master of the pithy question because he was educated
magnificently in my own constituency.
-
(Bexhill and Battle)
(Con)
And I am very proud to have been.
The Secretary of State knows well and cares deeply about
safety matters. As he also knows, I have spent too much of
my time with the clinicians in the cancer centres of
Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells. Will the review perhaps look
at administrative and back-office resources and at whether
they play any part in improving survival rates?
-
Mr Hunt
The whole House is thinking of my hon. Friend who, like
many people in this country, is going through a huge amount
of personal pressure as cancer strikes close to home. He is
right that back-office systems are often poor when it comes
to contacting patients, which is in contrast to the superb
clinical care that we are usually able to offer, so we will
absolutely consider that as part of the review.
-
Mr Speaker
I wish the hon. Gentleman well in the period ahead. I was
not aware of those personal circumstances, but the whole
House will wish his nearest and dearest all the best.
-
Hon. Members
Hear, hear.
-
(North Dorset)
(Con)
As I understand it, Public Health England, which is of
course operationally independent of Ministers, runs the
screening programme, so what assurances have the chair and
chief executive of that important organisation given my
right hon. Friend that the actions that he has usefully set
out today will be completed within the required deadlines
to meet the obvious and legitimate demands of patients?
-
Mr Hunt
PHE has given clear assurances that the problem has been
fixed, but it is open to any suggestions that the review
makes as to how things could have been handled better.
-
(North Warwickshire)
(Con)
I thank the Secretary of State for his statement. As
co-chair of the all-party parliamentary group on breast
cancer, I know that his Department takes breast cancer
seriously, so the Secretary of State and the ministerial
team will no doubt be as disappointed as I am that the
statement was necessary today. However, will he set out
what the women affected need to do and, importantly, what
additional steps can be taken to reassure and support those
women?
-
Mr Hunt
Anyone who has concerns as of today is welcome to call the
helpline, but the women whom we know have been affected will
be contacted by the end of the month. The first thing that
many people will do is take action on receipt of a letter. If
they are under-72, the letter will tell them that they will
shortly be sent a date for a catch-up scan. If they are
over-72, it will tell them how they can get advice as to
whether that is appropriate for them.
-
(Torbay) (Con)
I welcome the tone of the Secretary of State’s statement
today, even though its contents will be devastating for many
people and families across my constituency. Will he confirm
what engagement there will be with groups such as local
health watches and support networks to ensure that the
information that he has given is relayed to them and their
users?
-
Mr Hunt
That is a good point. I can assure my hon. Friend that the
Department will be leading a big consultation exercise so
that everyone is informed about how their individual
organisations will be affected.
-
(Crawley) (Con)
As chair of the all-party parliamentary group on blood
cancer, I am pleased that the Secretary of State talked about
the lessons that will be learned from this breast screening
error. Will he assure me that what is picked up will inform
future diagnostic programmes?
-
Mr Hunt
Absolutely. That will be one of the most important things
that the review does.
-
(Horsham) (Con)
Tragically, it seems that the flaws were of long standing—I
think the Secretary of State referred to a decade or more.
Notwithstanding the length of time that has passed, will he
assure the House that lessons will be learned that relate
back to the procurement and design decisions that were made
at the outset?
-
Mr Hunt
Absolutely. There are basically two parts to this process.
One is what the problem was with the original procurement,
and the other is the problem with the assurance of the
project over the time period.
-
(Boston and Skegness)
(Con)
I welcome the compassionate tone of the Opposition spokesman
and the Secretary of State, and I particularly welcome the
fact that he personally said sorry. Will he do all that he
can to ensure that faith is restored in such technologies,
because they do an awful lot of good when they work?
-
Mr Hunt
My hon. Friend is absolutely right. One of the most important
ways of getting that change in mindset is by giving patients
more control. Later this year, we will be offering all NHS
patients an app through which they can access their medical
record, and that should start to become a way in which people
take control of their healthcare destiny, including such
things as invitations to screenings for all cancers and many
other public health measures.
-
(Cheadle) (Con)
While Stockport is one of the best areas for cancer
identification, there will be concern that some people may
have missed a routine call for screening. Last year, my
constituents in Heald Green were particularly affected when
their local breast cancer screening provision was relocated
to Macclesfield District Hospital, which is over an hour
away. As we address the screening issue, does my right hon.
Friend agree that we must ensure that breast cancer screening
is local and accessible?
-
Mr Hunt
We need to ensure that screening is accessible. I fully
understand the concerns of my hon. Friend’s constituents, and
I am happy to ask the Public Health Minister to look into
that issue.
-
(Broxtowe) (Con)
My friend Emma Agnew, a woman in her own right but also known
as “Mrs Aggers” because she is married to the cricket
commentator Jonathan Agnew, is one of a remarkable group of
women who have faced breast cancer and beaten it, but it must
be said that she had huge support from her husband, and our
thoughts are also with my hon. Friend the Member for Bexhill
and Battle (Huw Merriman). Emma had a mammograph last
February and thought all was good, but she kept on checking
her breasts. Screening is wonderful, but she checked her
breasts, which is why she knew something was wrong in July.
She was immediately diagnosed, she received fantastic
treatment on the NHS and she is a survivor. Will the
Secretary of State reiterate that we must all keep an eye out
for cancer, whatever age we are?
-
Mr Hunt
My right hon. Friend speaks extremely wisely. We have the
Touch, Look, Check campaign, and it is important that we see
screening as just one important part of the battle against
breast cancer, but it is no substitute for many of the other
things that really matter.
-
(Thirsk and Malton)
(Con)
I thank my right hon. Friend for his statement and for his
tone. This was clearly a failure not only of IT, but of
quality assurance, so will he commission a review of quality
assurance right across the health service to ensure that it
is as effective as it should be?
-
Mr Hunt
My hon. Friend may well be right that we need to do that, but
what I would like to do first is to see the outcome of this
review, what the lessons are and what precisely it says about
the quality assurance that applied in this case and then make
a judgment about the implications for the rest of the NHS.
-
(Congleton)
(Con)
I thank the Secretary of State for the genuine personal
concern that he has shown today and for his determination to
get to the bottom of the matter. Will he continue to keep the
House and, more importantly, the public and any women
affected informed as further information comes to light?
-
Mr Hunt
Yes, I am happy to give that assurance. The number of people
affected is only an estimate at the moment, but there will
obviously be great interest in the House and in the country
in what the actual number ends up being.
-
(Kingswood) (Con)
An additional 200,000 to 300,000 women could be seeking
breast cancer screening within the next six months, which
works out roughly at an additional 2,000 women a day. What
reassurances can the Secretary of State give to the women who
were due a screening anyway that their treatment will not be
delayed as a result of the additional need?
-
Mr Hunt
That is an important question. One of our top priorities has
been to construct a resolution to the problem that will not
have an impact on the regular screening programme for women
between the ages of 50 and 70, which is so important. All I
can say is that a huge amount of trouble has been taken to
try to ensure that we are putting additional capacity into
the system to deal with the extra work.
-
(Witney) (Con)
I also welcome the compassionate tone used by hon. Members on
both sides of the House today, and my thoughts are with all
those affected. Will the Secretary of State reassure those in
west Oxfordshire and beyond who will be concerned that this
IT failure may be present in other critical systems that he
will do everything possible to ensure that that is not the
case?
-
Mr Hunt
Yes, absolutely. We are doing this review because we want to
understand precisely why this happened and what the proper
counter-measures are.
|