Bambos Charalambous (Enfield, Southgate) (Lab) I beg to move,
That this House has considered the safeguarding of children
and young people in sport. It is a pleasure to serve under
your chairmanship, Sir Roger. A few months after my election I was
contacted by one of my constituents, Mr Ian Ackley, who is present
here today, who told me that he was one of the people who...Request free trial
I beg to move,
That this House has considered the safeguarding of children
and young people in sport.
It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Sir Roger.
A few months after my election I was contacted by one of my
constituents, Mr Ian Ackley, who is present here today, who
told me that he was one of the people who had been sexually
abused as a child by the serial sex offender and predatory
paedophile Barry Bennell, who was convicted of 43 counts of
historic child sex abuse in February this year. I shall
briefly tell Ian’s story, to illustrate the failings of the
past, and then explain what I think still needs to be done to
safeguard children and young people in sport.
Ian told me how, as a talented young footballer aged nine, he
had been spotted by Bennell. Bennell used his charm and
suggested connections to top-tier football clubs to persuade
parents to allow their sons to sign for his club White Knowl,
which he ran in north Derbyshire. Ian told me that early on,
as the team was doing well, and having won the trust of his
parents, Bennell suggested that Ian stay overnight at his
place so that he could talk tactics with him and Ian would be
fresher for the game the next day. The parents, being very
trusting and totally taken in by Bennell, consented to the
stay-over; the sexual abuse began immediately. Ian was not
the only child to stay over. On some occasions there would be
a number of boys there, some sleeping in the same bed as
Bennell. Staying overnight at Bennell’s place soon became the
norm. It is hard to imagine that happening today, but those
were different times.
Ian, in talking to me, made it clear that many parents of
boys from other Manchester youth teams that his team played
against were aware of Bennell’s abuse. On some occasions they
confronted Bennell at matches, but it would seem they had
either chosen not to report the abuse to the police or to
take the matter further, or else that they had not been
listened to. Ian told me that the sexual abuse stopped when
he was 14 years old, when Bennell wound down his youth
football club. Ian’s football career came to an end a few
years later. In 1996 he went on to become the first person to
publicly blow the whistle on Bennell’s abuse in the
“Dispatches” television programme, which led to Bennell being
convicted of a number of sexual offences against him.
The trauma and anguish of being sexually abused remained with
Ian and are still with him. Since the recent revelations
about Bennell came out two years ago, Ian’s personal and work
life have suffered. Ian has used his experience with other
abuse victims Paul Stewart, and Derek Bell to set
up an organisation called SAVE, which seeks to engage with
victims and others, to inform and provide advice about
safeguarding in sport, and to raise awareness about potential
loopholes and oversights in procedures and day-to-day
activity.
I, like many others, assumed that the sexual abuse by Bennell
that Ian and others suffered could not happen today because
we live in different times from the 1980s, and sport has
changed beyond all recognition since that time; but on closer
inspection I think that there are areas that need improving.
Before preparing for this debate I met with the National
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, the head
of safeguarding at the Football Association and a
representative of the Lawn Tennis Association, and I spoke to
a number of people involved in safeguarding. The FA has an
exemplary safeguarding policy endorsed by the NSPCC child
protection in sport unit, which it should be proud of. It
even has a grassroots football safeguarding policy, which
covers everything—recruitment of volunteers and staff,
creating a safe environment, criminal record checks, travel
and trips, vulnerable people and even cyber-bullying.
Ideally, all clubs should fully implement and abide by those
policies, but I have a concern about how very small Sunday
morning football clubs, which are run predominantly by
volunteers, will be able to ensure that all those steps are
taken without finding them extremely burdensome.
-
I congratulate the hon. Gentleman on what is undoubtedly
a timely debate. Of course young people and children
should be safeguarded, but does he agree, having alluded
to volunteers, that we must respect the integrity of the
many thousands of them who are above reproach, and ensure
that the tiny minority who have been abusive are
completely and utterly isolated and alienated from
dealing with young children in sport?
-
The hon. Gentleman makes an excellent point. Trying to
close the loopholes, to stop abuse happening, is
paramount; but we must also take into account the fact
that many smaller clubs are run entirely by volunteers,
and we must thank the genuine volunteers who are there
for the benefit of the young people in the sport.
More structural support is needed at the regional or
county level to ensure that small clubs get help with
implementing safeguarding policies. There should be
someone at the regional or county level who ensures that
the policies are adhered to and that proper monitoring
takes place. It is often at the smaller clubs that abuse
will first happen, as in Ian Ackley’s case. We also need
to ensure that children and young people feel able to
speak out and be listened to when they call out abuse.
That is why we need to make sure that they can do so in a
safe environment, and that they are encouraged to speak
out. Children and young people could be given confidence
during player induction at sport settings about speaking
up if they come across abuse, and there are other means
whereby clubs can encourage young people to speak out
whenever they come across abuse or anything happens to
them.
When I met the Lawn Tennis Association I was staggered to
discover that not all tennis clubs are affiliated to it.
It has approximately 2,700 members, but more than 1,000
clubs are not registered with it. Some people might say,
“So what? What difference does it make?” This year, for
the first time, the LTA has made it a requirement that
all affiliated clubs use only LTA-accredited coaches, who
must meet a minimum safeguarding standard. Unregistered
clubs, on the other hand, are free to appoint whomever
they choose as a tennis coach. According to the LTA,
there are more than 800 “accredited tennis coaches”.
There are other coaching courses apart from the LTA’s,
but it is worth noting that some accreditation can be
obtained online for as little as £80. That means that a
child or young person could be having lessons at an
unregistered tennis club with a coach who obtained their
accreditation online by answering tick-box
questions.
What I am saying is in no way intended to call into
question good unaffiliated tennis clubs and coaches, but,
as we have seen time and again, people who abuse children
and young people find a way to get close to them, just as
rain gets through cracks in the pavement. The question
arises whether coaching courses should be licensed and
have Government-approved kitemarks to give people an idea
of the quality of the safeguarding training undergone by
the coach. Perhaps that could be a role for the child
protection in sport unit, which already gives ratings to
governing bodies. It is often hard for parents to
navigate all the different accreditations and codes, and
anything that makes things simpler, and easier to
understand, should be encouraged.
More needs to be done about summer sports courses. As
things stand, there would be nothing to stop me or anyone
else hiring a field and setting up my own summer football
skills course for kids. With some clever marketing, I
could be up and running with some cones, bibs and
footballs. I think more checks need to be carried out in
those casual arrangements, too. It is the sort of thing
that local authority trading standards teams could check,
provided they had the funding to do so.
-
I congratulate my hon. Friend on securing the debate.
Does he agree that all sports clubs, at whatever level,
dealing with children should have whistleblowing policies
under which they can refer themselves to a Government or
sports organisation and procedures that are available for
parents and children alike?
-
My hon. Friend makes a very good point. Whistleblowing is
important and must be catered for as far as possible.
Clubs should be able to report things higher up and
whistleblowers’ reports should be properly investigated.
Having mentioned coaches, I want to turn to the
definition of “regulated activity”. The Protection of
Freedoms Act 2012 tightened the definition of regulated
activity in relation to children to mean working
“regularly”—four or more days in a 30-day period—and
“unsupervised” with children. Coaching falls into that
category. If someone satisfies those criteria, sports
clubs can carry out an enhanced DBS—Disclosure and
Barring Service—check, with barred list check to see
whether the individual is barred from working with
children. However, it is an offence for a club to ask for
an enhanced DBS check on an individual if the role does
not require one. For example, the coach who coaches the
youth team every Thursday night would be classified as
falling into that category, but their assistant, who is
technically supervised by the coach, would not be caught
by that legislation.
Supervision does not always prevent abuse from happening,
as it often happens in plain view, with people
disbelieving that someone whom they have got to know well
and even considered a friend could ever commit such vile
acts of abuse.
-
I congratulate my hon. Friend on securing the debate. I
would like to place on the record my support and complete
admiration for those victims who have so bravely spoken
out about their terrible experiences at the hands of
Barry Bennell. They were let down. My constituents who
were victims are fighting tirelessly so that something
like that can never happen again. It is so important that
no stone is left unturned.
-
Order. Let me reiterate my plea for hon. Members not to
refer to cases that are before the courts.
-
-
I think that my hon. Friend was referring to someone who
has been convicted. We should congratulate the people who
came forward and whose cases led to convictions. More
cases may follow, and we do not want to go into that
area, but my hon. Friend makes a good point about the
bravery of the people who came forward.
A predatory individual could simply seek a supervised
role with a sports club that would allow them access to
children and young people. They could be groomed over a
long period and, once the individual had built a trusting
relationship with them, they could be exploited and
abused. There is evidence to show that adults who have
been barred from working with children will continue to
try to get access. The NSPCC has discovered that, since
the definition of regulated activity was changed in 2012,
more than 1,100 people who have been barred from working
with children because they pose a threat have been caught
applying to work in regulated activity by the DBS. I am
not aware of any statistics in relation to unregulated
activity.
Sports clubs can find it complex to identify which role
should be classified as regulated activity and which
should not, and could be at risk of committing an offence
of over-checking if they decide to carry out a DBS check
with barred list information on an individual in a role
that does not require it. It is clear to me that that
places sports clubs in a difficult position and that the
definition of regulated activity needs to be amended and
widened.
Another area that needs re-examining is “Positions of
trust”, as defined by sections 21 and 22 of the Sexual
Offences Act 2003. As the law stands, children are
protected from being groomed into sexual relationships by
trusted adults with power and influence over them. That
applies to teachers, social workers and doctors, but not
to sports coaches or youth leaders. That creates the
absurd situation that, if a physical education teacher
teaching football at school engaged in sexual activity
with a 16-year-old child, that would be an offence, but
if the same individual in a sports coaching role did the
same thing outside school, that would not be. There
should be no distinction between the two, and the law
needs to be changed accordingly.
-
I congratulate the hon. Gentleman on obtaining the
debate. We can put safeguards in place for the future,
but what more can be done to help those victims who have
been traumatised—those people who are living with the
trauma day in, day out?
-
The hon. Gentleman poses an excellent question. There
needs to be much more support for those people in
relation to their mental health. Many people are
suffering trauma as a result of past events. We need to
ensure that there is a proper support network for them,
so that they get the counselling, advice and therapy that
they need in order to come to terms with the appalling
effects of historical sexual abuse.
To return to the point about positions of trust, many
national governing bodies for sports want to see the
change to which I referred, and have told the NSPCC that
more than 50% of all safeguarding cases arise from
inappropriate relationships with sports coaches. I
understand that last year the Minister announced that a
ministerial commitment had been secured to extend the
“position of trust” provision to sports coaches. I invite
her to update us on the progress of that commitment.
Closer working with the police will be necessary. I have
been made aware of instances in which the police have
suggested that an individual may pose a risk to children
at a sports club, and that has led to the individual’s
suspension, only for the police to take no further action
because the suspension means that there is no longer a
risk. That sort of practice exposes clubs to challenges
to their decisions to suspend and may have an adverse
effect on an innocent individual.
Many victims of abuse will need advice and support when
reporting it and also in the aftermath, when they may
suffer from depression, have suicidal thoughts, be at
risk of self-harm and suffer with their mental health
generally. I know that last year the Government published
a Green Paper on children and young people’s mental
health, but will the Minister give serious consideration
to out-of-hours provision of support for victims?
At the start of the debate, I touched on how Barry
Bennell was able to get away with his sexual abuse of
boys, despite it being an open secret in Manchester and
other places. It is the responsibility of us all to call
out abuse when we see it. I would like to think that,
given the recent sex abuse scandals, none of us would
tolerate knowing about any such abuse and not reporting
it.
Playing sport should be fun, safe, enjoyable and
rewarding. The purpose of this debate is to ensure that
it remains so for children and young people. For the sake
of people such as Ian Ackley and the other brave victims
who spoke out about their abuse, and those who have not
done so or were not able to do so, who have been robbed
of their youth by the actions of evil men, I hope that by
speaking up and taking action now, we will be preventing
future abuse from happening in sport.
I appreciate that some of the matters that I have
mentioned may fall outside the Minister’s remit, but I
want to ensure that these issues have been properly aired
and I hope that she will be able to use this debate to
influence her ministerial colleagues to bring about the
changes that will make children and young people in sport
safer.
-
It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Sir
Roger. I, too, congratulate the hon. Member for
Enfield, Southgate (Bambos Charalambous) on securing
this timely and important debate, and on the
sympathetic way in which he outlined the case of Ian
Ackley. I also welcome Ian to Westminster and
congratulate him on his bravery, because it is only
through his bravery and that of others that dangerous
individuals such as Barry Bennell have been locked
up—put away—and a light has been shone on this
unacceptable and despicable practice.
Young people being interested in sport is key for their
development and fitness, and it is important that we do
everything possible to give them a positive environment
when they are learning and nurturing their skills and
developing the traits that we hope they will take
further into a sporting career, or just into life
generally as they get older. Of course it is imperative
that we protect children in sport. However, it is also
important, as the hon. Gentleman said, that we protect
adults who genuinely want to help children in sport. We
must alienate and root out the small minority who would
use their place in sport to try to harm children in
despicable ways.
I want to focus my remarks on what we are doing in
Scotland to safeguard children in sport. There is
currently a partnership between Children 1st and
SportScotland, working with local authorities, local
sports trusts, leisure trusts and sports clubs to
ensure that we do as much as possible to protect young
people in sport. Children 1st and SportScotland
published a 116-page document entitled “10 steps to
safeguard children in sport”. It is important that
everything is in there to ensure that the maximum
guidance is available to everyone involved in sport. It
is imperative that we get that document to all people
involved in sport in Scotland and across the UK.
In preparation for this debate, I spoke with my local
sports development officer in Moray Council, Kim
Paterson, who explained that she is the only tutor in
Moray—quite a wide geographical area—who is delivering
the safeguarding and protecting children course. Since
January she has run 10 courses and each of them has had
the maximum 20 participants, so 200 people in Moray
have taken the course in the past few months.
Kim told me that a number of people are almost forced
by their national governing body to do the course, so
they approach it like a tick-box exercise—they feel
that they have to do it. However, when they leave at
the end of the day, they tell Kim and others involved
in the class that they never knew there was so much
information available about protecting children in
sport. They might start the course a bit apprehensive
about having to do more training, but they leave with
far more information, and that is a positive
development. If they want to go on further, there is
the In Safe Hands course delivered by Children 1st,
which is the next level up, looking at child protection
officers within local clubs.
People sometimes see these courses as tick-box
exercises; they attend once and then never go back.
However, it is best practice to renew them every three
years. We should all be encouraging people to ensure
that they keep up to date with the standards expected
of them. Children 1st and SportScotland are looking at
an online version for refresher courses in future,
which I would very much support.
The debate is timely and reminds us of the bravery
displayed by Ian Ackley and others to ensure that
individuals who caused harm in sport were brought to
justice and did not get away scot-free. As the hon.
Member for Enfield, Southgate said, we live in
different times, but that does not mean that we should
be complacent. If we became complacent, by assuming
that this might have happened in the ’70s or ’80s but
would not happen in 2018, we would all be letting down
children and young people in our areas.
There has been progress across the UK—great work has
been done to protect and safeguard children and young
people in sport—but I truly believe that there is more
to do. Today’s debate reminds us all of the horrors of
the past. We must ensure that we do not allow that to
be a distant memory and we keep up our efforts to
ensure that our children can continue to enjoy sport,
to gain from sport and to live their dreams in sport,
but that they do not suffer nightmares, as many did
under Barry Bennell and others.
-
-
Order. I know that this is difficult, but I would be
grateful if hon. Members could keep names that are
before the courts out of the debate.
-
I can give you a categorical assurance that I will not
mention any names, Sir Roger, but I do want to speak on
this subject. I congratulate the hon. Member for
Enfield, Southgate (Bambos Charalambous) on securing
the debate—we spoke about this issue on the train last
Thursday and I understand his reasons for bringing it
forward. It is a very important issue for all of us in
this House. We are aware of your guidance, Sir Roger. I
would like to give a Northern Ireland perspective on
this debate. I look to the shadow Minister and the
Minister, as always, for suitable and helpful
responses.
As the proud father of three strapping young boys, and
the even prouder grandfather of two young
granddaughters, the issue of child safeguarding is
close to my heart. As a father, a grandfather and an
elected representative with direct contact with my
constituency, and as someone who has been involved in
sports over the years, my heart aches when I hear of a
child going through any form of abuse, whether mental,
physical or sexual. I wish to play my part in ensuring
that no child whatsoever goes through that pain.
There are some 430,000 children under the age of 18 in
Northern Ireland. Of those, almost 2,100 were
identified as needing protection from abuse in 2017. We
all know that that is not a true picture of how far
abuse goes. We all suspect that it goes much further
than that. Throughout the Province there is abuse
taking place that will never be talked about, and for
which justice will never be served. My hon. Friend the
Member for East Londonderry (Mr Campbell) and I were
just talking about that. There were probably lots of
things that happened when we were younger that were
never spoken about. It certainly did not happen in the
circles I was in, but that does not mean it did not
happen elsewhere, because obviously it did. Over 58,000
children were identified as needing protection from
abuse in the UK in 2016. This is a UK-wide issue that
must be addressed in a UK-wide manner. This is the
place to do that: in this House with the Minister
present.
I read the NSPCC’s briefing on preventing abuse of
positions of trust, which was very helpful. I agree
with the points that it made, and which the hon. Member
for Enfield, Southgate explained so well in his
introduction. It states:
“Sex crimes committed by adults in positions of trust
have increased by more than 80 per cent since 2014...
The number of offences where professionals such as
teachers, care staff and youth justice workers targeted
16 and 17-year-olds in their care for sex rose to 290
in the year to June—up from 159 three years ago. Nearly
1,000 crimes were recorded over the period, with the
figure steadily rising year on year.”
Current legislation does not include all sports roles,
for example coaches, assistant instructors or helpers.
We also need to include sports organisation and
settings, such as clubs, leisure facilities and events,
within these definitions. We need clarification. The
legislation needs to be tightened so that all of that
is covered. Is that something the Minister intends to
do?
-
I thank the hon. Member for Enfield, Southgate (Bambos
Charalambous) for securing this important debate. Does
the hon. Member for Strangford (Jim Shannon) agree that
we should also consider the role of the Charity
Commission? A case in my constituency has shown that
although the commission is good at ensuring that clubs
and organisations have correct policies in place, it
lacks the teeth to carry anything through. When
concerns are raised, it is very slow to follow up with
action.
-
The hon. Gentleman rightly outlines an anomaly that
needs to be addressed. Again, I look to the Minister
for a response. I would like to see it addressed in
legislation, and this debate gives us an opportunity to
do just that.
At present, abuse of a position of trust within most
sports contexts is not illegal, although there might be
circumstances in which the law does apply to sports
coaches, for example if they are employed by and
operating within a school. The hon. Member for York
Outer (Julian Sturdy) touched upon that as well. The
NSPCC’s view is that, because of the vulnerability of
young people and the particular circumstances of sport,
the legislation should be extended to roles and
settings within sport. We are deeply indebted to the
NSPCC for its briefing. It has outlined a number of
things that will be very helpful to the Minister. I ask
the Minister: when can this be done? When can the
initiatives and helpful suggestions set out in the
briefing and offered by hon. Members be taken on board?
I know that the Government, the Minister and hon.
Members are willing, so to me it is a matter of seeing
where we should prioritise moving this. It must be high
on the list of priorities and we must look for imminent
legislative change.
I am sure that we were all moved by the stories of the
Olympic gold medal-winning US gymnasts who eventually
spoke out about their coach. I was shocked at how
widespread the abuse was. My next thought was, “Could
this happen in Northern Ireland, in the United Kingdom,
or anywhere we have some representative, control or
input? How are we protecting our children who want to
excel and who put their trust in coaches and staff, but
who are taken advantage of?” In Northern Ireland,
people who work with children must have clearance, but
that protects children only from known offenders. What
legislation is in place to ensure that the first
inappropriate touch or talk is reported as a crime and
that steps are taken to convict? We must get to that
stage.
There is no protection in sporting circles for 16 and
17-year-olds, who are not protected under normal sexual
consent laws. That needs to change. As the hon. Member
for Enfield, Southgate said, the loophole must be
closed and laws on positions of trust must be extended
to the work of all those involved with children.
People, including us in this House, are blessed to have
an input in how to help a child or a young person to
grow in sport, education and life, and as a family
member. It is so important to have the right laws in
place to ensure that happens in the right way.
The bravery of those who have come out after years of
dealing with the secret pain of their abuse must be
applauded. No one in this House or further afield could
fail to be moved by some of the stories that we have
heard publicly—very publicly, usually. Moreover, those
people must be the catalyst for desperately needed
change. We must look to those people, who have come
through so much, and who speak out to make a change and
to ensure that no other child goes through what they
have gone through, and say that we will stand with
them.
-
I thank my hon. Friend the Member for Enfield,
Southgate (Bambos Charalambous) for securing the
debate. The hon. Gentleman’s point reminded me of
ChildLine, and how important a phone call to ChildLine
was. Given the problem that we have, perhaps the
Government should look at that again and reintroduce it
across the whole of the UK to let children speak. This
time, the Government should give ChildLine the money—I
think it was running out of money because of its
charity status. We need a lifeline for those kids so
that they can speak to someone they can trust.
-
The hon. Gentleman is absolutely right. We are all
aware of the good work that ChildLine does and the
initiatives that it has set out. We need to give it
support and assistance in any way we can. We should
ensure that it is more available and that young people
can take advantage of it. What the NSPCC did at the
beginning was a great step. Many people in my
constituency, across Northern Ireland and across the
whole United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern
Ireland took advantage of that opportunity.
We must not only stand with those people, but speak out
alongside them and act as they have acted, for the sake
of my granddaughters and other children across the
country. We always look to the Minister for support and
guidance. Today we ask her to take action and to do
what she can to protect all our children.
-
Before we proceed, I am aware of an element of
disquiet, so I will place the ruling on the record, so
that everybody understands why I have said what I have
said. I imply no personal criticism to any Member. The
Standing Orders for public business clearly state:
“Appellate proceedings, whether criminal or civil, are
active from the time when they are commenced by
application for leave to appeal or by notice of appeal
until ended by judgment or discontinuance”.
They are therefore sub judice. I understand the
strength of feeling in these cases—were I not in the
Chair, I might share it—but the fact is that one of
these cases is the subject of leave to appeal and
therefore cannot be referred to.
-
It is a pleasure to see you in the Chair, Sir Roger. I
am delighted to take part in this timely debate and I
pay tribute to my colleague on the Justice Committee,
the hon. Member for Enfield, Southgate (Bambos
Charalambous) for securing it. He opened proceedings
with a moving and powerful speech in which he spoke
about the traumatic abuse suffered by his constituent.
I commend everyone who has come forward for their
bravery.
It is worth remembering the huge benefits that sport
can have for the young. I often speak about the power
of sport to influence positive change, and that is
never truer than when we consider the impact of sport
on the young. The power of sport can improve a young
person’s self-confidence and discipline. Moreover and
crucially, as we continue to debate our response to
childhood obesity—nearly one third of children aged two
to 15 are overweight or obese—sport can help children
to lead healthier lives. Governments play a pivotal
role in promoting that through policy and financing. If
we in Scotland are to secure the legacy of the 2014
Commonwealth games, it will be through Scotland’s
children and young people.
As a parent of two young girls, I have always
encouraged them to get involved in sporting activities.
Although my eldest plays football, the vast majority of
their physical activity is done through the medium of
dance. There is an argument to be had about whether
dance is a sport or an art—I would argue that it can be
both—but that is for a future Westminster Hall debate,
at which I am sure the hon. Member for Strangford (Jim
Shannon) will join me.
The coaching and encouragement that my daughters
receive from their excellent teachers improve their
self-confidence and discipline—sometimes, at least. I
am aware of the trust and responsibility that all of us
as parents put in coaches who help our children. I
cannot speak highly enough of my daughters’ dance
teachers, and the vast majority of coaches take very
seriously their responsibility for the welfare of
children in their care.
This debate is not about limiting the sporting
opportunities for young people and children. In fact,
it is the opposite: it is about how we can ensure that
young people can flourish by having robust safeguards
in place to ensure that they can participate in sport
and physical activity safely and with confidence.
Over the past year or so, we have read horrifying
headlines of child abuse cases in sport. Such cases
have forced us to face the potential danger of children
being exploited in sport. The courageous victims have
made us confront whether appropriate safeguards are in
place to ensure the protection of young people.
An NSPCC report highlighted the extent of those dangers
and the real and frightening situation facing our young
people. According to the NSPCC, the number of recorded
sexual offences against children has increased in all
four countries in the UK over the past year. Although
those cases are not exclusively related to offences
committed in a sporting environment, we would be
foolish not to consider the issue in a sports setting
and assess what can be done to ensure the welfare of
young people in sport.
One way to do that is to better understand what abuse
is. The NSPCC’s child protection in sport unit states
that there are four types of abuse that young people in
sport can experience. They include neglect, which can
occur when a coach repeatedly fails to ensure that
children in their care are safe; a form of physical
abuse, where the nature and intensity of training or
competition exceed the capacity of the child’s immature
and growing body; and sexual abuse, which is another
form of exploitation that young athletes experience all
too often, as we have sadly seen. We also need to be
mindful that young people and children can suffer from
emotional abuse if they are subject to constant
criticism or bullying behaviour, as was brought up in
the Anti-bullying Week debate that I led late last
year.
We must always remember that abuse can take many
different forms, and if we are going to be successful
in eliminating that type of behaviour, we must be able
to better identify abusive behaviour when it happens.
We need to do a lot more to support children who have
been abused and we also need to take firm action to
prevent it from occurring in the first place.
In Scotland, we have a fantastic organisation called
Children 1st—the hon. Member for Moray (Douglas Ross)
has stolen my thunder somewhat in mentioning it—which
works with SportScotland, sporting organisations and
clubs to ensure that they have proper safeguards in
place to protect children from abuse. It provides
advice and training to staff, coaches and volunteers on
the development and implementation of child protection
policies, and it operates a helpline for those who have
concerns for a child’s welfare. As we have heard, it
recently launched the Safeguarding in Sport initiative
in partnership with SportScotland, which aims to
improve the safeguards in place for Scottish sport. The
aim is simple: to create the safest possible
environment for children in sport by working with
parents, coaches, teachers and volunteers to improve
the child protection policies and practices that clubs
should have in place to ensure the welfare of children
and young people.
Safeguarding in Sport has just published advice to all
junior clubs that work with young people and children.
Its recommendations include having a named contact for
the co-ordination of child protection. That role should
be clearly defined, to ensure that the responsibility
for the welfare of children is paramount. It also
recommends having a child protection policy that
reflects national guidelines and that is adopted by the
relevant management structure in the club; a variety of
child protection training methods—as we have heard from
the hon. Member for Moray—at appropriate levels for
those working or volunteering with children and young
people in sport; a much more stringent procedure for
the recruitment and selection of those who work with
children and young people, including access to the
protecting vulnerable groups scheme membership checks;
and a disciplinary procedure for managing concerns
about and allegations of poor practice, misconduct or
child abuse, including provision for referrals to the
children’s list.
I can speak highly of the work that Children 1st does
to help to ensure that young people participate in
sport safely. Its work puts the responsibility and the
onus on the clubs, coaches and parents with regard to
the welfare of the child, but Safeguarding in Sport
will support those people in meeting that
responsibility.
The SportScotland young people’s sport panel ensures
that the voices of young people themselves are heard on
this issue. Those young people played a crucial part in
developing the new standards for child wellbeing and
protection in Scottish sport. That work led to the
introduction of new standards for child protection in
sport, which are centred on the needs and rights of the
child.
The introduction of those new standards is to be
welcomed, as they will hopefully strengthen the
existing safeguards. However, we should also applaud
the way in which those standards were introduced and
developed. Involving young people in the process
ensured that their views were at the forefront of what
needs to be done do ensure the safety and wellbeing of
young people in sport.
There are approximately 1.1 million coaches in the UK.
Most of them are volunteers who give up evenings and
weekends to provide young people with sporting
opportunities. Coaches accept a lot of responsibility
and it is important that we support them in the same
way that they support children and young people. The
last thing we want to do is to design a system that
deters well-meaning people, who often are parents
themselves, from becoming coaches. Crucially, however,
we all want robust policies in place that allow young
people to enjoy sport in a safe and secure way, and it
is vital that community clubs are supported in that
endeavour.
-
Thank you for calling me to speak, Sir Roger; it is an
absolute pleasure to serve under your
chairmanship.
First, I thank my hon. Friend the Member for Enfield,
Southgate (Bambos Charalambous) for calling this
debate. I know that this issue is so important to him,
and he has been tireless in working to secure this
debate. I was extremely sorry to hear the story of his
constituent, Mr Ackley, who spoke so bravely about the
sexual abuse that he suffered. That cannot have been
easy, but Mr Ackley has provided a voice for those who
do not have one.
Sport should be enjoyed and loved by all. It has a
unique propensity to build communities and friendships,
to inspire and motivate, and to tackle much wider
issues, such as obesity and mental health. Also, as a
parent of two young girls, I know how much sport can
bring to children’s lives.
I am passionate about sport because I truly believe it
has the power to impact positively on all of our lives,
and at every opportunity we should encourage our
children to be healthy and happy. That is why, most
importantly, sport must be a safe space for all our
children, free from predators and those who wish to
cause harm.
Historical child abuse is one of the great issues of
our time. For decades, it has loitered on the doorsteps
of institutions. That time must end now. The scale of
the revelations that we have heard about in just the
past 10 years has shocked the UK to its core, and it is
our collective responsibility across Government, across
party lines and across governing bodies to tackle the
issue. We must ensure that victims are supported and
perpetrators punished, and we must do everything in our
power to prevent it from ever happening again.
This issue is by no means confined to football or
sport. We owe a great deal to the victims who have
spoken out and I pay particular tribute to Andy
Woodward, who waived his right to anonymity and told
The Guardian that he had been sexually abused as a
young player. His truly shocking and harrowing account
paved the way for many other victims to come forward.
Woodward’s actions sparked an inquiry that would change
the face of football, and I pay tribute to the bravery
of all those victims who have come forward since then
to share their stories, not least Mr Ackley himself.
Within a few days of the revelations emerging, I tabled
an urgent question for the Government and wrote to all
sports governing bodies requesting a full review of
their current safeguarding strategies, to make sure
that there are suitable procedures in place to properly
investigate historical claims and that there is
capacity to root out offenders.
Given that we had discussed the issue, I am pleased
that the Government have included sports coaches in the
law relating to the position of trust. What progress
has been made on implementing that?
I am sure that many Members present will join me in
welcoming the Scottish Government’s recent decision to
consult on introducing mandatory disclosure checks on
all sports coaches in Scotland. However, it is
important that we are not simply reactionary. We must
continue to work with Sport England, the NSPCC, the
police, the CPSU and national governing bodies, to
ensure that we set universal standards and instil best
practice.
My shadow Front-Bench colleagues and I have pushed for
the introduction of mandatory reporting, to place a
legal duty on people working with children to report
suspected abuse, suspicions and known abuse to
children’s social services. Our view has not changed
and nor will it. Mandatory reporting of child abuse and
neglect must be introduced, because it is more than
just a tick-box exercise. It is a chance to save lives
and we owe it to our children and to all those brave
people who have stood up and called out their
experiences. Without mandatory reporting, we will never
break the culture and we will never instigate
meaningful change; without it, we will allow the
perpetrators to continue unchallenged, as many of them
have been for so long.
Everyone here today wants to see an end to this scandal
and we are all working to achieve the same goal. Now is
the time to act, ensuring that good practice is shared
and, where necessary, new practices are put in place,
so that abuse does not take place in sport at any
level.
-
Thank you very much, Sir Roger, for calling me to
speak; as always, it is a pleasure to serve under your
chairmanship.
I start by thanking the hon. Member for Enfield,
Southgate (Bambos Charalambous) for securing today’s
debate and I welcome the opportunity to raise awareness
of this important issue and to highlight what we are
doing in this area.
This is a subject very close to my heart. As the
daughter of a social worker and the former coach of a
football team in my constituency, I have a great
appreciation for the important role of safeguarding,
not only in society but in grassroots sports clubs. I
have been pleased to see the positive impact that
improvements in safeguarding over the years have had on
young people, including at all levels of sport.
However, it is vital that we build on the provisions
that are already in place, so that all young people in
sport receive the very best protection.
Like the hon. Gentleman and others in this House, I
commend the immense bravery of all those who have
spoken out about the abuse they have suffered at the
hands of individuals in trusted positions in sport. I
had the privilege of meeting his constituent, Ian
Ackley, just before this debate. At the end of our
conversation, he was generous enough to say, “Thank you
for all you are doing.” My response was to say, “No,
thank you”—not you, Sir Roger, obviously, but Mr
Ackley—because without his bravery and that of others
we might not be having this debate today. I do not want
to open the papers in 20 years’ time and see another
Ian coming forward because we did not pay enough
attention to the systems that I am responsible for now.
I also pay tribute to Andy Woodward, whose bravery was
mentioned by the hon. Member for Tooting (Dr
Allin-Khan). I continue to support Andy on a regular
basis and I listen to what he has to say, including
where he thinks things should change. I would actually
call him a friend now. I hope that is what this
Government are seen as; basically, we want to ensure
that we change things, so that this type of abuse never
happens again.
Child sexual abuse is an abhorrent crime and it is
right that we learn from it to make sure that it never
happens again. Events over the last 18 months have
highlighted unacceptable behaviour that went
unchallenged for a long time. Sadly, this abuse has not
been confined to football or the UK. Colleagues will be
aware of the courageous gymnasts in the United States
who have spoken out against their team doctor, and we
have learned about widespread abuse within USA
Swimming. In the UK, the allegations of child sexual
abuse in football related to cases that took place
several decades ago. The independent review
commissioned by the FA into the allegations will
produce some important findings that we will all need
to consider when the report is published.
Safeguarding in sport is much stronger than it was in
the 1970s and 1980s, when the majority of these
dreadful events occurred. That said, we must remain
vigilant and continue to identify gaps in provision.
The Child Protection in Sport Unit, which is part of
the NSPCC, was founded in 2001 to be the expert
organisation on child safeguarding in sport. As part of
their funding agreements with Sport England and the
requirements of the code for sports governance, all
funded organisations must comply with the CPSU’s
standards for safeguarding and protecting children in
sport. All 43 county sports partnerships and 44
regularly funded national governing bodies meet and
maintain those standards. We have also taken steps to
promote best practice in non-funded sports. In March, I
launched a code of safeguarding in martial arts to set
consistent standards and provide parents with the
knowledge they need to make informed decisions about
where to send their children for instruction.
In our sports strategy, we recognise that the care of
participants must be a core part of our approach to
boosting participation. I asked Baroness Tanni
Grey-Thompson to carry out a review of sport’s duty of
care to its participants. One of the key findings was
that it can be difficult for people to come forward
with allegations about inappropriate or harmful
behaviour, particularly at the higher levels of sport.
It is vital that everyone in sport feels able to speak
out if they have been subject to harassment, bullying
or abuse. That is why we have enhanced whistleblowing
practices within the governance code of NGBs. I have
been clear that sports must co-operate and ensure that
they foster healthy cultures, or they will have to
answer to me. I am monitoring the situation carefully
and working with UK Sport to ensure that each funded
sport has robust grievance and whistleblowing policies
in place.
Today’s debate has rightly raised the issue of
inappropriate coach-athlete relationships. Sexual abuse
is a criminal offence, regardless of the age of the
victim or the relationship between the perpetrator and
the victim. Grooming is also a criminal offence. We
encourage anyone who has been subject to grooming or
abuse within sport, or is aware that it is happening,
to have the confidence to report it to the
police.
Concerns have been raised about seemingly consensual
relationships between coaches and young athletes in
their care. Children under the age of 16 are not
legally able to consent to sex: sexual activity with a
child under 16 has long been and remains a criminal
offence. However, there are clearly concerns that a 16
or 17-year-old, who may be above the age of consent,
could be a victim of coercive behaviour due to the
nature of the relationship between a coach and an
athlete. Colleagues have rightly pointed out that I, as
the Minister for Sport, am working closely with
colleagues across Government to develop proposals to
extend the definition of a position of trust under the
Sexual Offences Act 2003 to include sports coaches. We
are also investigating what further support we can give
to sports organisations to help them handle these
cases.
The hon. Member for Enfield, Southgate also makes an
important point about regulated activity. We must
acknowledge that DBS checks form only one part of the
overall picture. Employers should use a range of checks
to help them make safer recruitment decisions about
whether individuals are suitable to work with children.
These are two areas of policy that are primarily owned
by other Departments, and I appreciate that the hon.
Gentleman acknowledged that, but I can assure him and
others that my officials regularly discuss these
matters. I am working closely with ministerial
colleagues to make progress as quickly as possible.
As someone who has experienced the system as a coach
and as a manager, I want to say that grassroots clubs
take DBS checks very seriously. If coaches or managers
do not have certificates, they can have their charter
status removed by the county FA and be suspended from
the leagues they are in. I assure Members that
grassroots football clubs do not take this issue
lightly.
I thank all Members who have contributed today, but I
take a moment to thank the NSPCC and the CPSU for their
tireless work protecting children. Their campaigns,
support and guidance are incredible, and both
organisations helped the FA enormously in the immediate
aftermath of the exposé of historic child abuse in
football. I encourage colleagues to highlight to their
constituents the NSPCC guide to the questions that
parents should be asking clubs that their children go
to about their safeguarding policies. As the hon.
Gentleman said, we all have a responsibility on this
issue. My door is always open to anyone who wants to
discuss safeguarding in sport.
At the very centre of this issue are children, who must
be safe to enjoy sport free from harm. We all know of
the benefits that young people gain from sport. It
helps develop communication, teamwork and physical and
mental health, to name just a few. Across the UK,
children participate in sport with the help of
thousands of supportive and responsible adults, most of
whom are volunteers. We must not lose sight of the
fantastic work these adults do to create fulfilling
opportunities in sport for our young people. None the
less, just one case of abuse in sport is too many. We
have made good progress, but we must continue to
respond to the new and evolving challenges we face. I
want to see the UK continue to lead the way in all
matters of welfare and safeguarding so that we have a
system in which every child is valued, protected and
safe.
-
First, I thank the hon. Member for Moray (Douglas Ross)
for speaking about the excellent work that Children 1st
does in Scotland. There is much we can learn from it, and
I look forward to finding out more about that. The hon.
Member for Strangford (Jim Shannon) said that unspoken
abuse was a UK-wide issue. He also talked about positions
of trust and roles and settings. Those are important
issues, and I am grateful to him for making those points.
The hon. Member for Paisley and Renfrewshire North (Gavin
Newlands) spoke not only about sport but about the issues
outside sport in dance and other activities. They
encompass the wider child safeguarding issues we need to
take into account. He also talked about getting a better
understanding of the definition, the excellent work of
Children 1st and the need to involve young people in
setting policies and standards. Often, we draw up
policies and forget to involve young people, and it is
important that we bring them on board. My hon. Friend the
Member for Tooting (Dr Allin-Khan) spoke about safe
spaces in sport, our collective responsibility and
mandatory reporting. Again, we need to take those into
account. That could be progressed further.
It is pleasing to hear the Minister’s comments and about
the positive steps she has taken. I hope we will see more
action, particularly in relation to positions of trust
and regulated activity. I hope she will keep us informed
about that, but she is right that it is not only about
those areas; we also need wider support to ensure that
DBS checks are taken seriously at the regional and county
level. She spoke about non-funded sport, which needs far
more support than the governing bodies, about the duty of
care to participants and about the need to speak out.
I agree with the Minister on the excellent work the NSPCC
has done. Its briefings for this debate were exceptional.
We need to involve it as much as we can in these issues.
Obviously, we should not forget the support that comes
from adults and volunteers. As she rightly said, one case
of abuse in sport is too many. I hope that she will come
back at some stage with positive news about positions of
trust and regulated activity. I am grateful for her
response today. It has been a helpful debate, and I hope
it will be the first step in ensuring that young people
and children enjoy sport and get amazing benefits from
it, but are kept safe for as long as possible.
Question put and agreed to.
Resolved,
That this House has considered the safeguarding of
children and young people in sport.
|