Asked by Lord Sherbourne of Didsbury To ask Her Majesty’s
Government what assessment they have made of the effectiveness of
Police and Crime Commissioners in holding their chief constables
and police forces to account. The Minister of State, Home Office
(Baroness Williams of Trafford) (Con)...Request free trial
Asked by
-
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have
made of the effectiveness of Police and Crime
Commissioners in holding their chief constables and
police forces to account.
-
My Lords, police and crime commissioners have brought
local accountability to how chief constables and their
forces perform, and work hard to ensure that their local
communities have a stronger voice in policing. As the
Home Affairs Select Committee recognised in its March
2016 report, PCCs are here to stay and their introduction
has worked well.
-
Is my noble friend the Minister aware of what has
prompted this Question, namely the Wiltshire Police
investigation into Sir Edward Heath and the way in which
it was conducted by the then chief constable, Mr Mike
Veale? The police and crime commissioner has the power,
and some would say the duty, to commission an independent
inquiry but, for reasons I do not understand, he has set
his face against doing so. Does this not make a mockery
of the policy that chief constables are accountable—and
should be seen to be accountable—to their commissioner?
There really is a need for an independent inquiry.
-
I certainly understand why my noble friend has brought
this Question forward today, and I understand the
frustration felt by him and other noble Lords on this
matter. A few noble Lords came to see me about this issue
and I wrote to them outlining the position on it. I also
wrote to the PCC of Wiltshire and I will outline the
position again today. Under Section 79 of the Police
Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011, the Secretary
of State has issued a policing protocol which PCCs and
chief constables must have regard to when exercising
their functions. This protocol provides scope for a PCC
to commission an independent review into a force’s
investigation to assist that PCC in their statutory duty
of holding the chief constable to account. I could not
have made the Government’s position on this clearer, and
thank my noble friend for his Question.
-
My Lords, I refer the Minister back to a point made by
the noble Lord, Lord Blair of Boughton, on 11 October,
when he said that,
“the Chief Inspector of Constabulary is the person to
whom a Government should look for an inquiry to begin
into whether this has been done properly”.—[Official
Report, 11/10/17; col. 231.]
Was that followed up by the Minister? She has now come up
with an alternative of a protocol, which I understand can
probably be ignored by police commissioners if they
choose to do so. Finally, is not the reality that this
Government have stood by, watched and witnessed the total
destruction and trashing internationally of the
reputation of a former Prime Minister? That is quite
outrageous.
-
I recall the comment of the noble Lord, Lord Blair. If I
recall, I answered at the time that the route for such an
inquiry would be through the PCC. The position is no
different now. The police are operationally independent
of the Government and that is the route.
-
My Lords, may I make it absolutely clear that the
Government can take further action? The whole legal
system is based on the Government intervening at a higher
level when something is transparently wrong. Give or take
the fact there are protocols, I am quite sure that the
Government could commission a judge-led inquiry into this
appalling report on Sir Edward Heath. I quite agree with
the noble Lord, Lord Campbell-Savours; it is a disgrace
and pathetic that the Government have not acted long ago.
-
My Lords, I repeat the assertion that I made earlier: the
police are operationally independent of government. On
this matter it would be for the PCC, perhaps in
conjunction with the chief constable, to commission an
inquiry.
-
My Lords, did the PCC reply to the Minister’s letter, and
what was the reply?
-
I know that the PCC has been in correspondence with other
noble Lords. I am reluctant to talk about individual
correspondence at the Dispatch Box. I am sure the noble
Lord will understand why that is, but I think he will
also understand why this Question has come up again
today.
-
My Lords, I would like to broaden this out. Can the
Minister explain how party-politically aligned police and
crime commissioners can effectively hold chief constables
to account? We have a situation at the moment with Labour
and independent police and crime commissioners blaming
central government real-terms cuts to police budgets for
reductions in policing services, while Conservative
police and crime commissioners toe the Conservative Party
line, claiming that budgets are being maintained. Who is
really to blame for drastic cuts in police numbers? Is it
inefficient chief constables or is it the Government?
-
My Lords, there certainly are PCCs who stand under
party-political banners. There are also independent PCCs.
I do not think that there are any Lib Dem PCCs, although
the Lib Dems are very good at political campaigning. It
is for PCCs to hold their chief constables to account. It
is also for police and crime panels to scrutinise PCCs,
and they do.
-
-
-
We will hear from the noble Lord on the Conservative
Benches. If he is quick, we will have time and will go
over to the Greens.
-
My Lords, those of us who had concerns about the
appointment of these commissioners are doubly concerned
now because of the behaviour of the Wiltshire
commissioner—and that of the Cleveland commissioner, who
has sanctioned the appointment of the police chief who
acted so deplorably and so manifestly unfairly. Can we
not have a review of the whole system?
-
My Lords, people can always bring out individual reasons
why such a move is not the best, but HASC in 2014 and
2016 praised the advent of the police and crime
commissioner for visible accountability and leadership on
the appointment of chief constables. That is for the
individual forces to do through an open and transparent
appointment process.
|