The House of Lords Constitution Committee has today
warned that the Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Bill, the
first Brexit Bill to be scrutinised by the House of Lords,
contains inappropriately broad powers for ministers.
The Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Bill is intended to
provide a new, long-term legal basis for ministers to make
secondary legislation concerning sanctions, money laundering and
terrorist financing. The Bill is expected to begin committee
stage in the House of Lords on Tuesday 21 November.
The Constitution Committee’s scrutiny of the Bill
includes:
-
Ministerial powers – the Bill
creates a broad Henry VIII power authorising ministers to make
‘sanctions regulations’ and allows new forms of sanctions to be
created by secondary legislation. The Committee say that it is
not appropriate for ministers to have such broad
powers.
-
Scrutiny – the Committee say
that it is essential that the Bill provides sufficient
safeguards and parliamentary scrutiny procedures to make the
new sanctions powers constitutionally
acceptable.
-
Legal certainty – individuals
subject to sanctions under the Bill have no right to know the
reasons for the sanctions until their appeal against them
reaches the courts. The Committee say that this prevents them
from preparing their case, undermining common law principles
and procedural fairness.
-
Criminal offences – the Bill
allows ministers to create criminal offences punishable by up
to 10 years’ imprisonment, while also setting the rules on
evidence consideration and defence to those offences. The
Committee say that they are deeply concerned by this
power.
Chairman of the Committee Baroness
said: “The Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Bill
grants unduly broad powers to ministers and establishes sanctions
regimes that will be subject to less scrutiny and challenge than
those that exist at present.
“The Bill is the first piece of Brexit legislation to be
scrutinised by the House of Lords. The Government should not use
the transfer of laws from the EU to the UK as an opportunity to
increase its own power, reduce scrutiny, or weaken individuals’
rights.”