Asked by Lord Bird To ask Her Majesty's Government, further
to the Written Answer by Lord Henley on 6 March (HL5600) concerning
early intervention programmes, what steps they are taking to
prioritise their focus on the root causes of poverty and
disadvantage. The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State,
Department for Work and Pensions (Baroness Buscombe)
(Con) ...Request free trial
Asked by
-
To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written
Answer by on 6 March (HL5600)
concerning early intervention programmes, what steps they
are taking to prioritise their focus on the root causes of
poverty and disadvantage.
-
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for
Work and Pensions (Baroness Buscombe) (Con)
My Lords, tackling the root causes of child poverty and
disadvantage includes taking action on parental
worklessness. New analysis carried out by the Department
for Work and Pensions shows that children living in
workless families are significantly more disadvantaged and
achieve poorer outcomes than other children, including
those in lower-income working families. Improving Lives:
Helping Workless Families, published on 4 April, provides a
framework for a continued focus on improving children’s
outcomes now and in the future.
-
(CB)
I thank the Minister very much for her reply. I would like
to make the obvious statement that prevention—
-
Noble Lords
Question!
-
Oh! I am sorry. I will not make a statement; I will ask a
question. Forgive me. Could Her Majesty’s Government move
inexorably towards a situation where we could put prevention
right at the centre of all the work we do? We know that
prevention pays off. We know that when money is spent on
prevention, it reaps enormous benefits. Could Her Majesty’s
Government look at the possibility of creating a prevention
unit across both Houses and all parties, so that we could at
last make sense of the need to prevent people falling into
poverty because too many people are stuck in poverty and are
not getting out?
-
I thank the noble Lord very much for his question. I entirely
agree that the focus must be on prevention. We strongly
believe that it was right to replace the income-related child
poverty targets, which we had until 2010, with statutory
measures of parental worklessness and children’s educational
attainment—the areas that can make the biggest difference to
children’s outcomes. We believe that the way to help people
out of poverty is through employment. A great deal of
progress has been made and employment is now at a record high
level. However, although record levels of employment are
great, one in eight children across the UK still lives in a
workless family, and we need to tackle that. A prevention
unit is a great idea but the reality is that we can perform
that function by working across government, as we are doing,
on the strategy that we have now developed within work and
pensions.
-
(Lab)
My Lords, the noble Baroness will know that the evidence on
social mobility and what makes social mobility work is now
very strong. Two of the factors are excellent childcare and
excellent early years education. Why, then, do the Government
not accept that and put more money into that kind of early
intervention for children?
-
My Lords, we are working on our strategy for childcare
because we understand that, if we are to have people in work,
we have to have the right system in place supporting
childcare that works for everyone. I know that colleagues
across government are looking at this at the moment,
improving on the support for young families that we already
have. The reality is that we want to focus on prevention
through getting more people into work, because we know that
that increases people’s confidence and their health and
well-being, and all that impacts on the child and their
future levels of attainment and well-being.
-
The Lord
My Lords, does the Minister agree that there is a problem
here, in that we want to applaud the employment figures
released today but, at the same time, we need to recognise
that it is people in employment who are using our food banks,
where the numbers have rocketed in the last few years?
Therefore, the simple statement that we applaud the rise in
employment disguises a deeper problem.
-
I entirely agree with the right reverend Prelate that it is
not a question of just making statements; it is more about
making sure that we do the right things from the bottom up.
We have to take on board the fact that we continue to spend
over £90 billion a year on benefits for people of working age
but that targets to put more into that area have not worked
in the past. The reality is that we know that children in
families where no one works are significantly more
disadvantaged and achieve poorer outcomes, and it is right
that we focus on improving the long-term outcomes for those
children. Improving Lives: Helping Workless Families provides
a framework for a continued focus on tackling worklessness.
For those in work, we have introduced major reforms to make
work pay, and we are introducing universal credit to
strengthen incentives for parents to move into and progress
in work.
-
(LD)
My Lords, the Institute for Fiscal Studies says that the
level of child poverty is rising and predicts that by 2020 5
million children will be living below the poverty line. Why
does the Minister think that that is the case, and what
strategies does she think need to be implemented to address
it? These are serious matters. Do the Government have an
overarching strategy that will tackle the root causes of
child poverty?
-
Yes. I am sorry if I have not spelled it out but the reality
is that we have a strategy for tackling child poverty. It is
about putting more people into work so that children grow up
in families where there is work, and educational attainment
is also hugely important, but the rates of relative poverty
are unchanged since 2009-10. We believe that employment is
key to alleviating poverty. Children in workless households
are five times more likely to be in poverty than those in
households where all adults work. It is thanks to this
Government’s actions that there are now 828,000 fewer
workless households and 590,000 fewer children in workless
households compared with 2010.
|