Extracts from Parliamentary proceedings - June 22
Extracts from Lords debate on the Queen's Speech Lord Howell of
Guildford (Con):...In addition, the business visa policy needs
changing, and students should be taken out of the immigration
figures. It is madness that we have halved our student intake from
the dynamic India, to the benefit of America and Germany. Our
universities are our spearhead of influence across the world;
weaken them and we weaken our whole trading and commercial
future... Lord Bilimoria (CB):...During the visit...Request free trial
Extracts from Lords
debate on the Queen's Speech
Lord Howell of Guildford (Con):...In addition, the business visa policy needs changing, and students should be taken out of the immigration figures. It is madness that we have halved our student intake from the dynamic India, to the benefit of America and Germany. Our universities are our spearhead of influence across the world; weaken them and we weaken our whole trading and commercial future... Lord Bilimoria (CB):...During the visit in November, Prime Minister Narendra Modi brought up with Prime Minister Theresa May that movement of people is important for India. We talk about trade deals, but there can be no trade deal without looking at the movement of people as well. The Indian High Commissioner here, Mr YK Sinha, has said very clearly that India is open to a bilateral trade deal but there will be no trade deal without looking at the movement of people. Look at the realities of a country such as India, with 1.25 billion people. How many bilateral trade deals does India have with the rest of the world? Nine, and not one with a western country.
These trade deals are meant to support the UK in making a smooth
exit from the European Union, ensure that UK businesses are able
to benefit from trade with the rest of the world and cement the
UK’s leading role as a great global trading nation. What a
contradiction this is. On the one hand, the Brexiteers say, “You
do not need a free trade deal with Europe—look at America
and India, they deal with Europe and they do not
have free trade deals with Europe”. On the other hand, they say,
“The solution to all our problems is to do free trade deals with
the rest of the world, which we can do once we leave the European
Union”. Why do people not see though this nonsense? People have
got to wake up to this. We are already one of the most open
economies in the world. Trade already makes up 65% of our GDP. We
are already the third-highest recipient of foreign direct
investment in the world and the highest recipient of foreign
direct investment in the EU. To leave the EU would be to leave
50% of our trade—45% of our exports and 55% of our imports... The Minister of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office (Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon) (Con):...When we talk of the issues of religious freedom and the rights of all, as the noble Lord, Lord Alli, so poignantly expressed, they are a reflection of our incredible country. We heard when talking about trade and the Commonwealth just now that perhaps India should play a bigger role. Is it not a great tribute to our country to look across your Lordships’ House, or the other place, at the Government and Opposition Benches, and the Benches of all parties? We can proudly say that over the last 50, 40, 30 and 20 years, and the last decade, we have seen people of all backgrounds, faiths and communities coming forward to represent their country. Not only am I honoured, I am greatly humbled to stand in front of your Lordships’ House today in my new role... ...This Government believe that free and open trade in a liberal, rules-based system is vital for reducing poverty and sharing prosperity around the world. Encouraging trade and inward investment is a vital part of building a domestic economy that works for everyone, creating jobs and transforming local communities and industry. The UK is uniquely well placed to attract investment, and we are seeing results. In my previous role I signed a new air agreement with India, and others will follow... Extracts from Commons debate on the Queen's Speech Leo Docherty (Aldershot) (Con):...Anyone familiar with my constituency will know that one figure who literally towers over us is the Duke of Wellington. The Iron Duke sits on horseback in massive bronze relief on top of Round Hill. The Iron Duke, never one to be over-patient with politicians, would, I think, have agreed with this nation’s other greatest soldier-turned-statesman, Sir Winston Churchill, who, as a young cavalry officer, lived in Aldershot cavalry barracks before deploying to India. Churchill famously said: “Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.” Mr Owen Paterson (North Shropshire) (Con):...About three years ago, I made a speech saying that we should nationalise the acquis. That was my expression for adopting the whole corpus of European law and filleting it at a later date. The idea goes right back to the reception statute of Virginia of 1776, the reception provision of the Delaware constitution of 1776, the moves to make Australia and New Zealand independent, the Irish Free State Constitution Act 1922 and the Indian Independence Act 1947, all of which adopted existing UK law but said that from the stroke of midnight, any further provisions made in this Parliament would not apply... |