Jeremy Corbyn As Home Secretary, the Prime Minister clearly
did not protect police budgets. Last week, she told me four times:
“We have protected the schools budget.”—[Official Report, 22
March 2017; Vol. 623, c. 854-855.] Does she still stand by
that statement? The Prime Minister We have protected schools’
budgets, and we are...Request free
trial
-
As Home Secretary, the Prime Minister clearly did not protect
police budgets. Last week, she told me four times:
“We have protected the schools budget.”—[Official Report, 22
March 2017; Vol. 623, c. 854-855.]
Does she still stand by that statement?
-
The Prime Minister
We have protected schools’ budgets, and we are putting record
funding into schools.
-
Today, the Public Accounts Committee says of the Department
for Education:
“The Department does not seem to understand the pressures
that schools are already under.”
It goes on to say that
“Funding per pupil is reducing in real terms”,
and that school budgets will be cut by £3 billion—equivalent
to 8%—by 2020. Is the Public Accounts Committee wrong?
-
The Prime Minister
What we will see over the course of this Parliament is £230
billion going into our schools, but what matters is the
quality of education in schools. An additional 1.8 million
children are in good or outstanding schools, and this
Government’s policy is to ensure that every child gets a good
school place.
-
The daily experience of many parents who have children in
school is that they receive letters asking for money. One
parent, Elizabeth, wrote to me to say that she has received a
letter from her daughter’s school asking for a monthly
donation to top up the reduced funds that it is receiving.
This Government’s cuts to schools are betraying a generation
of our children. If the Prime Minister is right, the parents
are wrong, the teachers are wrong, the Institute for Fiscal
Studies is wrong, the National Audit Office is wrong, and the
Education Policy Institute is wrong. Now the Public Accounts
Committee, which includes eight Conservative Members, is also
wrong. Which organisation does back the Prime Minister’s view
on education spending in our schools?
-
The Prime Minister
As I have just said to the right hon. Gentleman, we said that
we would protect school funding, and we have; there is a
real-terms protection for the schools budget. We said that we
would protect the money following children into schools, and
we have; the schools budget reaches £42 billion, as pupil
numbers rise, in 2019-20. But I also have to say to him that
it is about the quality of education that children are
receiving, with 1.8 million more children in good or
outstanding schools than there were under the Labour
Government.
Time and again, the right hon. Gentleman stands up at Prime
Minister’s questions and asks questions that would lead to
more spending. Let us look at what he has said recently: on
11 January, more spending; on 8usb February, more spending;
on 22 February, more spending; on 1 and 8 March, more
spending; and on 15 and 22 March, more spending. Barely a
PMQs goes by that he does not call for more public spending.
When it comes to spending money that it does not have, Labour
simply cannot help itself. It is the same old Labour: spend
today and give somebody else the bill tomorrow. Well, we will
not do that to the next generation.
|