This House of Commons Library briefing paper provides information
on the Homelessness Reduction Bill's progress to date.
The main thrust of the Bill is to refocus English local
authorities on efforts to prevent homelessness. The Bill has
completed its progress through the House of Commons. The debate
on Second Reading in the House of Lords took place on 24 February
2017. No amendments were tabled following its commitment to a
Committee of the whole House and the Third Reading debate in the
Lords is scheduled for 23 March 2017.
Background
drew second place in the
Private Members’ Bill Ballot and introduced the Homelessness
Reduction Bill 2016-17 on 29 June 2016 (Bill 7 of
2016-17). The debate on Second
Reading took place on 28 October 2016. The Bill
extends to England and Wales but will only apply in
England. The Bill and its Explanatory Notes are on
the Parliament website.
Full background on the Bill and its provisions as originally
presented can be found in Library Briefing Paper
7736, Homelessness Reduction
Bill 2016-17. The main thrust of the Bill is to refocus
English local authorities on efforts to prevent homelessness.
The Government published a series of policy fact
sheets on each clause of the Bill by way of background
as it progressed through Public Bill Committee.
The Bill has attracted Government and cross-Party support. It
was considered during seven sittings of the Public Bill
Committee between 23 November 2016 and 18 January
2017. The Report Stage and Third
Reading took place on 27 January 2017. The
Bill’s debate on Second Reading in the House of Lords
took place on 24 February 2017. The Bill was committed to
a Committee of the whole House but no amendments were set down
and the Order of Commitment was discharged on 10 March 2017.
Third Reading in the House of Lords is scheduled to take place
on 23 March 2017.
Amendments made
Government amendments to clauses 1 and 11 were agreed in Public
Bill Committee. The Government committed to bringing forward
amendments to clauses 4 and 7 on Report. Further Government
amendments to clauses 5, 6, 9 and 12 were agreed on Report. An
amended version of the Bill has been published:HL Bill 96 of
2016-17
What will the Bill do?
The Bill is seeking to amend Part 7 of the Housing Act
1996. Its measures include:
- An extension of the period during which an authority should
treat someone as threatened with homelessness from 28 to 56
days.
- Clarification of the action an authority should take when
someone applies for assistance having been served with a valid
section 21 notice of intention to seek possession from an
assured shorthold tenancy.
- A new duty to prevent homelessness for all eligible
applicants threatened with homelessness.
- A new duty to relieve homelessness for all eligible
homeless applicants.
- A new duty on public services to notify a local authority
if they come into contact with someone they think may be
homeless or at risk of becoming homeless.
Funding the new duties and a commitment to
review
The Bill creates new duties for English local authorities and a
good deal of debate in Public Bill Committee and on Report
focused on how much these duties would cost, and whether they
would be fully funded by the Government. On 17 January 2017 the
Minister, , announced that
funding of £48 million would be provided to meet the additional
costs for local authorities. Authorities’ representative bodies
have given this announcement a ‘cautious’ welcome but have
asked the Government to commit to a review of the Bill’s impact
after two years “to ensure that authorities are fully equipped
and funded to deliver the Bill’s ambitions.”
The Government amendments agreed on Report will result in
additional costs for local authorities. The Minister announced
that the estimated impact would be £13 million, bringing total
Government new burdens funding for authorities up to £61
million. The Minister also committed to review the
implementation of the legislation, “including its resourcing
and how it is working in practice, concluding no later than two
years after the commencement of its substantive clauses.”