Local Authorities: Business Rate Retention Steve Double (St Austell
and Newquay) (Con) 1. What discussions he has had with local
authorities on 100% business rate retention. [908140] Mr Steve
Baker (Wycombe) (Con) 4. What progress he has made on
enabling local authorities to retain 100% of business rates.
[908143] The...Request free trial
Local Authorities: Business Rate Retention
-
(St Austell and Newquay)
(Con)
1. What discussions he has had with local authorities on
100% business rate retention. [908140]
-
Mr (Wycombe) (Con)
4. What progress he has made on enabling local authorities
to retain 100% of business rates. [908143]
-
The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
(Sajid Javid)
Councils have long campaigned for 100% business rate
retention. Last week, we introduced the Local Government
Finance Bill, which will establish the framework for the
reform system. We will continue to work closely with local
government during the passage of the legislation to shape
the detail of the reforms.
-
I welcome the decision that Cornwall will be a pilot area
for the retention of business rates. However, business
rates in Cornwall are low, particularly when compared with
urban areas. Will the Secretary of State reassure the
people of Cornwall that Cornwall Council will not lose out
on any funding as a result of the changes?
-
I am pleased that Cornwall will be one of the areas to
pilot some elements of the new 100% business rate retention
system. The pilot will help us to develop the system and
make it work for all local authorities, including rural
authorities. We have been clear in setting up the system
that we will ensure redistribution between councils, so
that areas do not lose out just because they collect less
in local business rates.
-
Mr Baker
As you know, Mr Speaker, Buckinghamshire is the
entrepreneurial heart of England. What assurances can the
Secretary of State give the people of Wycombe that the
needs-based review and the new business rate system will
result in rebalanced service funding to reflect better
economic growth in entrepreneurial areas such as ours?
-
I have visited the area with my hon. Friend several times,
and he is right to call it entrepreneurial. Under the new
business rates retention system, the redistribution of
resources will continue, with baselines set through the
fair funding review, so that all authorities are treated
fairly.
-
Mr (Sheffield South East)
(Lab)
The Secretary of State will be aware that the Select
Committee on Communities and Local Government was
supportive in principle of the Government’s proposals when
it considered this issue, but it wants a lot of details. A
major question of detail that needs resolution is this:
future demand for adult social care is likely to grow far
more quickly than the growth in business rates, so does he
recognise that, in addition to retaining 100% of business
rates, local authorities will need additional funding for
adult social care? Will he agree to a review to consider
that?
-
I am sure that the Chair of the Communities and Local
Government Committee welcomes last month’s announcement of
additional resources for adult social care, but he quite
rightly points to the need for longer-term reform—something
that the Government are taking seriously.
-
Mrs (South Shields)
(Lab)
The Government’s plans to devolve attendance allowance as
part of business rates retention has caused great distress
to the over 1 million elderly people who rely on it to
maintain independence and remain in their own homes. Will
the Secretary of State reassure them today that the reform
will not in any way strip them of that vital allowance?
-
The hon. Lady highlights the fact that councils will have
an additional £12.5 billion a year when the 100% retention
reform takes place. More responsibilities need to be pushed
down to councils as a result. She asks what might make up
those responsibilities. We have not yet made a decision,
but we will do so in due course.
-
(Rugby) (Con)
In two-tier local government, it is the district council
that allocates land for important commercial development.
Will the Secretary of State ensure that districts are
appropriately awarded for taking often difficult decisions?
-
My hon. Friend make a good point about districts and their
role in promoting business and development. We introduced
the Local Government Finance Bill last week. I am sure that
he will welcome the fact that councils outside London can
also promote business development districts.
-
(Great Grimsby)
(Lab)
The Government’s autumn statement showed an increase in
business rates income to the Treasury of £2.4 billion in
2017-18, but that remains unallocated. Will the Secretary
of State protect local people from massive council tax
increases by investing that money in social care and ending
the precept, as suggested in October by Unison, the largest
trade union supporting careworkers?
-
The hon. Lady will be fully aware that this country had a
huge budget deficit back in 2010, thanks to the previous
Labour Government. All areas of Government have had to make
a contribution to dealing with that, including local
government. I am sure that she will welcome the changes to
adult social care that were announced last month.
-
(New Forest East)
(Con)
Does the new system allow local authorities any discretion
with regard to business rates levied on hospitals that,
like Southampton general hospital, face a rather large
increase in business rates following a revaluation?
-
I can tell my right hon. Friend that the new system does
allow some discretion to councils, but I do not think it
will apply to hospitals. It will apply to businesses, and
only in one direction, but as he has made the point, I will
take a further look.
-
Mr (Harrow West)
(Lab/Co-op)
Further to the question asked by my hon. Friend the Member
for Sheffield South East (Mr Betts), when the Government
committed to letting local authorities keep 100% of
business rate income, they promised, alongside that,
commensurate further cuts to their funding from Whitehall.
Given that the Local Government Association estimates that
councils are already underfunded for their legal
responsibilities, including social care, to the tune of
almost £6 billion, when will the Secretary of State tell
the House what further cuts in funding the people of
England can expect their local services to suffer?
-
As we have publicly announced the numbers, the hon.
Gentleman should be aware that 97% of councils have
accepted the four-year budget deal and have come forward
with efficiency offerings. In return, the Government have
guaranteed the funding. That does not mask the fact that,
of course, so many councils find it challenging to deal
with their settlement, but many councils are able to do
deal with it. He should look at that carefully.
Social Care: Funding
-
(Houghton and
Sunderland South) (Lab)
2. What assessment he has made of the adequacy of funding
for adult social care. [908141]
-
The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
(Sajid Javid)
Our actions through the spending review in 2015 and the
provisional local government finance settlement have
brought the total dedicated funding for adult social care
to £7.6 billion over the four years from 2016 to 2020. How
much a local council spends on adult social care is rightly
a matter for local councillors, who know these pressures
best.
-
The Local Government Association has been clear that the
money raised through increasing the social care precept
will not be nearly enough to address the £2.6 billion gap
facing adult social care by 2020. Instead of exacerbating
the postcode lottery, will the Secretary of State not
commit to additional ring-fenced resources for social care
to tackle this crisis?
-
In the last spending review, the Government allocated an
additional £3.5 billion a year by 2020 to adult social
care. Just a few weeks ago, I announced £900 million of
additional help over the next two years. Local councils do
have to play a role in this, and I note that in Sunderland
the average council tax bill is down in real terms since
2010. If a local council in Sunderland chooses to allocate
more, it can do that.
-
Mr (Hertford and Stortford)
(Con)
For many of my constituents the fundamental problem in all
too many cases is that we still separate healthcare funding
and social care provision. That makes no sense to my
constituents and increasingly little sense to me. I
therefore urge the Secretary of State to speed up the
integration of health and social provision, so that we can
actually deal with patients’ needs in the round and put
them, rather than budgetary arguments, first.
-
My hon. Friend makes a very important point, which is that
adult social care is not all about money. Of course, money
and resources have a huge role to play, but it is also
about how those services are delivered. The many councils
that are able to approach integration in a better way have
seen significant efficiencies, and we can all learn from
that.
-
Mr Speaker
I appeal to the Secretary of State to face the House, so
that we can all benefit from his mellifluous tones.
-
(Kingston upon Hull
North) (Lab)
19. Between 2010 and 2020, around £40 million will have
been taken out of the adult social care budget in Hull. The
effect could be seen this weekend in what is happening in
our local NHS hospitals. Will the Secretary of State think
again and make sure that the problems that local
authorities like Hull are facing are addressed by central
Government ring-fenced money? [908161]
-
I am sure that the hon. Lady will welcome the announcement
made a few weeks ago that tried to recognise the pressures
that she identifies: there will be £900 million of
additional funding over the next two years, on top of the
£3.5 billion by 2020. She rightly highlights that we need
to keep looking at this situation to see what more can be
done.
-
Mr (Wellingborough)
(Con)
I could not agree more with my hon. Friend the Member for
Hertford and Stortford (Mr Prisk). Most Members have had
somebody come to their constituency surgery who desperately
needs help, with local government and the health service
agreeing that they need help with social care, but with
both blaming each other, and it becoming a complete mess.
Would it not be a good idea, on a cross-party basis, to
look at a new model for social care?
-
My hon. Friend is right to point that out, and I have seen
many situations such as he describes in my constituency. He
also highlights the need for all of us to talk about this
issue to see what we can do, working together.
-
(Stoke-on-Trent South)
(Lab)
20. According to Stoke-on-Trent’s clinical commissioning
group, there is, on average, a 26-day delay between someone
being ready to leave Royal Stoke University hospital and
getting social care in place, and that despite a £6 million
subsidy from the CCG. Is that the fault of Stoke-on-Trent
City Council, or is it because of the Government’s lack of
funding? [908162]
-
Again, the hon. Gentleman highlights the fact that for many
areas, delivering adult social care is challenging, which
is why I know he would welcome our recent announcement of
additional funding on top of the funding settlement
announced in the spending review in 2015. But the
Government also recognise that there needs to be a
long-term, sustainable solution, and I know that is the
reform he would welcome.
-
(Rossendale and Darwen)
(Con)
I spent a day with carers just before Christmas, seeing the
amazing work they do across Rossendale. They, like me, feel
frustrated that they are constantly under financial
pressure, so will the Minister look at what can be done
about increasing funding for social care, in addition to
what we have already done, and making sure that the funding
has a cast-iron ring fence to make sure that the money goes
where it is needed most?
-
I can assure my hon. Friend that we will continue to look
at the resources applied to adult social care, from both
local councils and central Government, to make sure that
they are adequate. We will also continue to push the case
for reform to ensure that all councils realise that more
can be done, besides just getting more funding.
-
(Blackburn) (Lab)
What steps is the Secretary of State taking to ensure that
local authorities are able to move patients in need of
social care from hospitals to a more appropriate facility
in a timely manner, thus preventing bed-blocking?
-
The hon. Lady will know that both my Department, working
with local authorities, and the Department of Health have a
role to play in doing just that; they are working together
closely on integration plans with all local councils. Part
of the funding— £1.5 billion a year by 2020, in the
improved better care fund—is designed to do just what the
hon. Lady suggests; it is money that goes towards trying to
promote just such integration.
-
Library figures show that between November 2013 and
November 2016, instances of bed-blocking for which social
care needs were solely responsible increased by 89%. In the
12 months to November 2016 alone, bed-blocking has
increased by 39%. Does the Minister recognise that the
precept package brought forward by the Government in
December is insufficient to solve the crisis in our social
care system, and is putting further pressure on our already
stretched NHS?
-
What the Minister recognises is that the additional funding
announced in December will make a big difference: £240
million of additional money is coming in from the new homes
bonus repurposing; and an additional almost
£600—[Interruption.] It is new money. An additional almost
£600 million is coming in from the precept changes. When it
comes to using that money, we all want to see a reduction
in delayed transfers of care. The hon. Lady will be aware
of big differences between local councils on delayed
transfers of care, and some councils can certainly learn
from others.
Local Authorities: Long-term Funding
-
(Mid Worcestershire)
(Con)
3. What discussions he has had with local authorities on
long-term funding certainty. [908142]
-
Mrs (Chesham and Amersham)
(Con)
15. What discussions he has had with local authorities on
long-term funding certainty. [908156]
-
The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
(Sajid Javid)
Ninety-seven per cent. of councils have accepted our
historic offer of four-year funding certainty, and the
Local Government Finance Bill will ensure that councils
keep 100% of locally collected taxes by the end of this
Parliament.
-
The Secretary of State will be particularly aware that
Worcestershire is a very attractive place to live, work and
visit, and a particularly attractive place to retire to,
which is why we have a disproportionately large elderly
population. How is the Department factoring into its
long-term funding plans the additional needs of areas with
a more elderly population?
-
I thank my hon. Friend for that question. As a
Worcestershire MP, I wholeheartedly agree with his opinion
of our great county: it is a great place for anyone to
visit, live and holiday in. I recognise that demographic
pressures are affecting different areas in different ways,
which is why we are undertaking a fair funding review to
introduce a more up-to-date, transparent and fairer needs
assessment formula—something that I know my hon. Friend
will welcome.
-
Mrs Gillan
Mr Speaker, as you will know, the Secretary of State has
received a proposal from Buckinghamshire County Council to
create a new unitary authority to serve the whole county.
He is also meeting the district councils, which are
submitting to him a proposal for two unitary authorities.
Will he confirm that he will give both those proposals
equal and full consideration, including by consulting local
residents, as happened in Dorset? Can he assure me that
unitary status will not lead to any reduction in funding
for Buckinghamshire residents?
-
I can give my right hon. Friend the assurance she seeks. Of
course, I will give careful consideration to all proposals
from local authorities, such as those in Buckinghamshire,
including any financial implications. We need to ensure
that any reform is right for local people and can deliver
better services and strong local leadership.
-
(Ilford North)
(Lab)
I should declare that I am an elected member of the council
of the London Borough of Redbridge. Local authorities such
as mine face a double whammy of pressures from an ageing
population and a high birth rate, which lead to funding
pressures on our local authority. Does the Secretary of
State accept that even if local authorities like mine
divert resources from other council services into adult
social care and charge the maximum social care precept
available, they will still face a shortfall in funding for
vital services for older people? What is he going to do
about that?
-
The measures we announced in December will help the hon.
Gentleman’s local authority; they will help every local
authority in the land to deliver more adult social care
services. Nevertheless, as I have said, as well as more
money, we need reform. Some councils need to learn from
others.
-
(Bristol South)
(Lab)
A 2015 Public Accounts Committee report outlined a 37%
reduction in central Government support for local
authorities between 2010 and 2016. What does the Secretary
of State have to say to my Bristol South constituents, who
are concerned about how the £64-million cuts announced by
Bristol City Council last week will affect them?
-
I say to the hon. Lady’s Bristol South constituents, “Don’t
forget where a Labour Government gets you.” The deepest
deficit of any developed country, the biggest recession in
almost 100 years and the largest banking bail-out—all that
has meant that this Government have had to make some
difficult decisions, and every part of local government has
had to contribute to that.
-
(Lichfield)
(Con)
Does my right hon. Friend agree that the long-term
financial stability of local government is a function of
not only funding from Government but good management in
local authorities? What does he think we can do to attract
people with business experience to running good local
government?
-
My hon. Friend makes a good point. This is also about
leadership, which means local authorities having many
businesses in their area and promoting them. They need
someone with a good track record and experience from which
local people would benefit. I can think of someone like
that in the west midlands: Andy Street.
-
(Sefton Central)
(Lab)
The Secretary of State knows full well that leaving
patients in hospital when they are medically fit to be
discharged, as has happened to 130 people currently at
Aintree hospital, is a very expensive way of looking after
people. Why is he not shouting from the rooftops for the
£4.6 billion that was cut from social care to be
reinvested, so that councils can address the problem now
and in the long term?
-
Helping with adult social care is about resources, which is
why I know the hon. Gentleman would have welcomed the
announcement a few weeks ago of an additional £900 million
over the next two years. I am sure he will agree that it is
also about reform, and that he will have noticed the big
difference in delayed transfers of care between one
authority and another.
Social Care: Funding
-
(Carshalton and Wallington)
(LD)
5. What plans he has to increase funding for social care.
[908144]
-
The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
(Sajid Javid)
The Government have listened to calls from local government
and to representations from right hon. and hon. Members
across the House. New changes outlined in the provisional
local government finance settlement in December provide
access to an additional £900 million over the next two
years.
-
The social care precept in Sutton would raise about £2.5
million, but Sutton is losing £8 million in revenue support
grant. A one-off social care grant will give Sutton about
£750,000, but Sutton is losing £1.5 million from the new
homes bonus changes, which are paying for the one-off
grant, resulting in a loss of £800,000. Does the Secretary
of State agree that, as long as the Government are robbing
Peter to pay Paul, we will see cancer operations cancelled
and patients left in distress because of bed-blocking?
-
As a result of the spending review announcement of £3.5
billion extra to be paid into adult social care by
2020—£3.5 billion a year—and the announcement that I made a
few weeks ago of £900 million over the next two years, all
councils, including Sutton, will have more resources to
deal with adult social care challenges.
-
(Torbay) (Con)
I know that the Secretary of State will agree that the
progress made with Torbay’s integrated care organisation
was very welcome, but does he also agree that it was
concerning to see that very strict financial rules from NHS
England are now prompting a renegotiation in terms of a
risk agreement even though no extra money will be spent?
Will he agree to work with the council, the trust and
colleagues in the Health Department to see whether we can
resolve this?
-
I am happy to work with my hon. Friend to see what can be
done and to listen to the concerns that he raises. Torbay
is a good example of how integration can work and how it
can really help local people.
Homelessness
-
Sir (Chelmsford)
(Con)
6. What recent steps his Department has taken to help rough
sleepers and homeless people. [908146]
-
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Communities
and Local Government (Mr Marcus Jones)
The Government are committed to tackling homelessness. We
have launched a £50 million homelessness prevention package
and are backing the most ambitious legislative reforms in
decades through the Homelessness Reduction Bill. I am
delighted that Chelmsford will be one of the country’s
first homelessness prevention trailblazer areas announced
by the Prime Minister last month.
-
Sir
I am very grateful to the Minister for his reply. Does he
agree that in the 21st century rough sleeping is totally
unacceptable? Will he tell me more about what is being done
not only in England as a whole but in Chelmsford to end
this stain on our society?
-
Mr Jones
The whole House will agree that rough sleeping is totally
unacceptable and that we should do all we can to end it.
Our £20 million rough sleeping grant will fund 54 projects
working to provide rapid response support for rough
sleepers across England. It will help to prevent people
from spending a night on the streets in the first place. I
am delighted to tell my right hon. Friend that Chelmsford
will receive almost £900,000 funding for preventing
homelessness in partnership with neighbouring local
authorities.
-
(Neath)
(Lab/Co-op)
17. The inspirational ladies football player, Fara
Williams, was homeless at 17, but went on to play 157 times
for England, including as captain, and is now at Arsenal.
Fara supports Centrepoint’s appeal for funds to set up the
first national freephone helpline for 16 to 25-year-olds
who are homeless and at risk of living a life on the
streets, as she was. Does the Minister agree that that is a
tremendous, long overdue initiative and that it should be
funded by the Government? [908159]
-
Mr Jones
The hon. Lady is right to bring that prime example to our
attention. The fact that somebody is rough sleeping does
not mean that they do not have the ability to reach their
full potential, but we need to encourage them to do that.
The Government currently pay for a service called
StreetLink, which people can ring, or use an app, to report
those who are sleeping rough. The details are then brought
to the attention of the local housing department.
-
Mr (Kettering)
(Con)
I declare my interest as a member of Kettering Borough
Council.
Will the Minister congratulate Kettering Borough Council
and its inspirational housing director, , on the measures they
have taken during the recent cold weather to get all rough
sleepers off the streets in Kettering and give them the
appropriate housing advice they need?
-
Mr Jones
I thank my hon. Friend for giving that very important and
heartening example. Some local authorities across the
country are doing excellent work to prevent homelessness
and rough sleeping, and the type of initiative he mentions
should be followed by other local authorities.
-
(Glasgow Central)
(SNP)
On Wednesday, Glasgow City Council will consider a report
that shows the devastating impact the universal credit
roll-out is having on homelessness services in the city. So
far, it has resulted in 73 homeless individuals racking up
debts to the council of £144,000, an average of £1,971 per
person. That is completely unsustainable both for the
individuals and the council. What impact is the UC roll-out
having on local authorities across the UK?
-
Mr Jones
The Government have increased discretionary housing
payments to £870 million across this Parliament to mitigate
some of the short-term challenges people face from the
welfare changes. As for the local housing allowance rate,
30% of the savings from that policy will be repurposed to
help people in the highest value areas with the challenges
in affordability.
-
I am afraid that is completely inadequate. Since 2011-12,
welfare reform has meant that homelessness services in
Glasgow, Scotland’s largest city, have seen cuts of more
than £6 million to their temporary accommodation budgets.
Does the Minister not accept that really to help rough
sleepers and people who are homeless there must be
co-ordinated work across all Government Departments? We
cannot have one Department undermining the services of
another.
-
Mr Jones
The hon. Lady makes a good point and I assure her that we
are working extremely hard across Government through a
cross-governmental working group, which I chair. She
mentions the fact that temporary accommodation and the
temporary accommodation management fee, which originates
from Department for Work and Pensions policy, is being
devolved to local authorities and to the Scottish
Government.
-
(Hammersmith)
(Lab)
Rather than patting themselves on the back, should not the
Government be apologising for allowing rough sleeping to
double since 2010? This is not an insoluble problem; it
merely requires action such as that taken by the previous
Labour Government, which cut street homelessness by three
quarters. Will the Minister adopt the initiative announced
last month by my right hon. Friend the Member for Wentworth
and Dearne (John Healey) and commit to an extra 4,000 homes
to end rough sleeping altogether?
-
Mr Jones
It will not be lost on the hon. Gentleman that under the
Labour Government, in 2003, homelessness was at its peak.
This Government are absolutely committed to making sure
that we eradicate rough sleeping and we are working
extremely hard, with a £20 million fund for local
authorities, as I mentioned earlier, and £10 million for
social impact bonds to get our most entrenched rough
sleepers off the street.
High Street Store Vacancies
-
(Ellesmere Port and
Neston) (Lab)
7. What estimate his Department has made of the number of
high street store vacancies. [908148]
-
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Communities
and Local Government (Andrew Percy)
We have taken significant action to help high streets adapt
to changing shopping habits and to thrive. Shop vacancy
rates are well down from their peak in 2012 and figures
from Savills estate agents show that investment in high
street retail property last year was up 17% from the year
before.
-
High streets in my constituency continue to struggle, as
they do up and down the country. My local authority does
what it can, but the support it can give is limited. It
needs Government intervention and support to make the
necessary transformation. Will the Minister agree to meet
me and other interested colleagues to see what can be done?
-
I would be delighted to meet the hon. Gentleman. The
business rate revaluation will have a positive impact for
his constituents, and I discussed the issue of high street
regeneration with the chair of his local enterprise
partnership, Christine Gaskell, just before Christmas, but
I am more than happy to meet him to discuss that. We are
also looking at proposals that we are working up with Revo
on how we can share best practice, because this is very
much a varied picture across the country.
-
(Gainsborough)
(Con)
14. Our small market towns are being stripped of their
banks: there is no bank now in Caistor, and Market Rasen is
down to one. What is the Minister’s policy to try to
encourage more competition in the retail banking sector so
that we can try to encourage banking in our rural towns?
[908155]
-
This is an important point—the issue has affected my
constituency—and one that I am happy to discuss further
with the Treasury. The business rate revaluation will have
a positive impact on retail property in my hon. Friend’s
constituency, as it will across many parts of the north and
midlands.
Social Care: Funding
-
(Bishop Auckland)
(Lab)
8. What steps he is taking to ensure that adult social care
is adequately funded. [908149]
-
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Communities
and Local Government (Mr Marcus Jones)
We recognise the pressures faced by the social care system.
On top of the funding that we announced in 2015, which will
deliver nearly £3.5 billion a year by 2019-20, we are
providing an additional £900 million over the next two
years for social care.
-
Unfortunately, Durham has already had to make £55
million-worth of cuts. The precept will bring in £4
million, but another £40 million of cuts are in the
pipeline. Some villages will face private contractors being
unable to afford to provide any social care whatsoever. May
I suggest that the Minister go back to the Treasury and ask
for another announcement on 8 March?
-
Mr Jones
The hon. Lady will know that Durham will benefit from the
additional £900 million to which the Government are giving
local authorities access over the next two years. It will
also significantly benefit from the improved better care
fund, which is £105 million this year, £825 million the
following year and £1.5 billion in the last year of this
Parliament.
-
(Bexhill and Battle)
(Con)
Given that so much of the funding for adult social care
goes towards care homes, and given that so many care homes
are failing their Care Quality Commission inspections, will
the ministerial team consider wrapping care home reform
into the adult social care reform that has been announced?
In particular, will they consider requiring local
authorities to build new care homes, just as they have to
build schools and GP surgeries?
-
Mr Jones
I thank my hon. Friend for his constructive suggestions—we
are always willing to listen to those. As he might be
aware, the Department of Health is looking carefully at how
care homes are provided, and particularly at regulation and
the role of the CQC.
-
(Enfield North) (Lab)
Funding per head of population in Westminster and in
Kensington and Chelsea is almost double that received by
Enfield, and Enfield is facing spending pressures of £5.9
million in adult social care in 2017-18 alone. Can the
Minister confirm not only that will he look at the
ring-fencing issue, but that he is serious about properly
reflecting the assessed needs of our communities in the
future local government funding formula?
-
Mr Jones
I met the chief finance officer of Enfield Council last
week, along with my hon. Friend the Member for Enfield,
Southgate (Mr Burrowes), as part of the local government
finance settlement consultation. The right hon. Lady will
be aware that local authorities across the country will
benefit from the £900 million that they will have access to
over the next two years, and from the improved better care
fund, which is ramping up quickly over the next three
years.
Neighbourhood Plans
-
(Loughborough)
(Con)
9. What plans he has to enhance and extend neighbourhood
plans. [908150]
-
The Minister for Housing and Planning (Gavin Barwell)
The Neighbourhood Planning Bill and my recent written
ministerial statement will further strengthen neighbourhood
planning, ensuring that communities have the ability to
shape the development of their area, not speculative
development.
-
I thank the Minister for that welcome answer. It has been
encouraging to watch local communities develop their
neighbourhood plans over the past few years. Will the
Minister clarify how much time councils and communities
will have to update their neighbourhood and local plans
once data on new housing numbers have been published, and
will he ensure that neighbourhood and local plans carry
full weight for that period?
-
I can reassure my right hon. Friend on that point. The
Government’s expectation is that plans should be reviewed
every five years, but when new data come to light it does
not mean that existing plans are automatically out of date.
-
Mr (Huddersfield)
(Lab/Co-op)
Will the Minister ensure that when we have neighbourhood
plans we involve local and national businesses more in the
planning procedure? So many of the global and national
chains suck the money out of our communities, and many of
them put little investment back. What incentives can he
introduce?
-
First, there is the possibility of having neighbourhood
plans purely for business district areas, which the hon.
Gentleman might want to look at in his constituency. There
is also the wider issue of ensuring that we capture the
uplift in value when businesses apply for planning
permission, and there is a review of the community
infrastructure levy and section 106 on my desk at the
moment.
-
Sir (Mid Sussex)
(Con)
Will my hon. Friend pay tribute to the hundreds of people
in Mid Sussex who have devoted a great deal of time to
putting together neighbourhood plans, and will he assure us
that in his White Paper steps will be taken to secure the
integrity of the plans?
-
I pay tribute not only to the people my right hon. Friend
mentions but to him, because he has been a huge champion of
neighbourhood planning in Mid Sussex and has spoken about
it repeatedly. I hope that my written ministerial statement
has helped addressed some of his concerns, but there will
certainly be further action in the housing White Paper.
-
(Stretford and Urmston)
(Lab)
Pressure on local authority budgets is leading local
authorities to encourage the building of high-cost homes to
boost the council tax take. That completely misses the
point regarding the local need for starter homes and
affordable family homes. What can be done to encourage and,
indeed, perhaps to incentivise local authorities to ensure
that housing need is matched by housing provision?
-
The national planning policy framework is very clear on
that point. When local authorities conduct their
assessments of housing need, they should not just look at
the total number of homes required, but the right mix of
housing to cater for the demographic profile including, for
example, the number of elderly people who might need
specialist housing. The hon. Lady is quite right to draw
attention to that issue.
-
(Thirsk and Malton)
(Con)
I very much welcome the increase in housing starts, the
number of which has doubled since the first quarter of
2009. To get to the level we need, we need a resurgence of
small and medium-sized house builders. Does the Minister
agree that we need local authorities and local communities
to allocate more small sites in their local plans and
neighbourhood plans?
-
My hon. Friend is absolutely right. We are far too
dependent, at this point in time, on a small number of
large developers. Therefore, we need to ensure that the
land that has attracted small developers is released and
that those developers have access to finance.
House Building
-
(Plymouth, Sutton and
Devonport) (Con)
10. What steps he is taking to promote the building of more
homes. [908151]
-
The Minister for Housing and Planning (Gavin Barwell)
Since July, we have announced: a £3 billion fund to support
small and medium-sized enterprises; an additional £1.4
billion for affordable housing; a £2 billion accelerated
construction programme; a £2.3 billion infrastructure fund;
funding for starter homes; and support for 17 garden towns
and villages. The White Paper will contain further
measures.
-
As my hon. Friend knows, the all-party parliamentary group
for excellence in the built environment, of which I am the
chairman, published its findings into the quality of new
build housing. Would he be willing to meet the all-party
group to discuss our findings and our suggestions of
inclusions in the forthcoming White Paper?
-
I would be delighted. I have attended a meeting of the
all-party parliamentary group for the private rented
sector, which my hon. Friend also chairs; he is a busy man.
He is quite right to say that, as we address the
fundamental challenge of getting the country to build the
homes we desperately need, we must not lose sight of
quality as well as quantity.
-
Mr Speaker
The hon. Member for Plymouth, Sutton and Devonport (Oliver
Colvile) is very busy. He has many commitments and an
extremely full diary. I do not think that anybody doubted
the point.
-
Ms (Westminster North)
(Lab)
Is Westminster City Council right to expect other local
authorities across the south-east and as far as the
midlands to take on the responsibility of housing as well
as providing education and social care for London’s people
in housing need?
-
I would think that London MPs, Westminster councillors and,
indeed, everybody would expect that, as much as possible,
local authorities should meet the need to house in their
area those who are homeless in their area. Our guidance is
clear about that. The fact that some local authorities have
to place people outside their areas is an indictment of the
failure of the country, over 30 or 40 years, to build
enough homes. We are going to put that right.
-
(North Swindon)
(Con)
Local authorities and communities are incentivised to
deliver vital new homes through the new homes bonus.
However, very few residents are aware of the new homes
bonus, so do not see the gain of development. Does the
Minister agree that local authorities should set out how
they spend their new homes bonus in the annual council tax
bill statement?
-
My hon. Friend makes an important point, which I am happy
to look into. There is a wider issue of ensuring that
communities see the benefit of new housing. With the
community infrastructure levy and section 106 payments, we
must ensure that communities know the benefits that they
are getting in return for accepting housing.
-
(Dudley North) (Lab)
Dudley would be able to do much more in the area if its
budgets were not being cut by 20% compared with just 1% in
Surrey and 2% in Buckinghamshire. That has put pressure on
a whole range of council services, not just housing. For
instance, libraries are closing and social services are
under pressure. Over Christmas, hard-working, low-paid
staff in Dudley had to take three days unpaid
leave—effectively a pay cut of 1%—because of this
Government’s cuts. How can Ministers sit there and tell me
that the cuts they have imposed on Dudley are in any way
fair?
-
The hon. Gentleman is certainly creative. The question was
actually about building more homes. I point out to him
that, over the course of this Parliament, the Government
are doubling the housing capital budget, which will enable
more homes to be built in his area.
Business Rates
-
(Southport) (LD)
11. What progress has been made in the review of business
rates. [908152]
-
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Communities
and Local Government (Mr Marcus Jones)
The Government concluded the business rates review in March
2016. Following the review, the Government announced a £6.7
billion cut in business rates over the next five years and
a permanent doubling of small business rate relief. As a
result, 600,000 small businesses will pay no business rates
at all.
-
I thank the Minister, but has he done any serious analysis
of the process in order to give any comfort to the
hard-pressed average high street currently competing
against the internet and trading in very, very difficult
circumstances?
-
Mr Jones
I hear what the hon. Gentleman says. There is no doubt that
many external factors do challenge our high streets, but
there is a significant package of £6.7 billion. He may want
to encourage some of the business owners on his high street
to check the revaluation of their business rate following
the 2017 business rate revaluation, which is now online.
Homelessness
-
(Halifax) (Lab)
12. What assessment he has made of trends in the number of
homeless people sleeping rough between 2010 and 2015.
[908153]
-
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Communities
and Local Government (Mr Marcus Jones)
No one should ever have to sleep rough. Our £20 million
grant fund will help those new to the streets. The £10
million for eight social impact bonds covering 48 areas
will build on the success of the world’s first social
impact bond, which we funded in London. This has helped
over 400 entrenched rough sleepers to get back on to their
feet and into accommodation.
-
I appreciate that response, yet Calderdale Council tells me
that the number of non-statutory rough sleepers in our
district has never been higher. While local charities are
doing everything they can to tackle homelessness, the
council’s supporting people budget has been slashed by 50%.
Does the Minister agree that unless we support and empower
our local authorities to do this work properly, we stand no
chance of reducing the numbers sleeping rough on our
streets?
-
Mr Jones
As the hon. Lady will know, this Government are backing the
Homelessness Reduction Bill, currently going through the
House, which will put a number of obligations on local
authorities to help people earlier so that they do not
become homeless. The announcement on funding for that Bill
will be made very shortly. We are also, as she has heard,
providing £50 million to start that work at this point so
that we do not waste time waiting for the legislation to
come into effect.
-
(Derby North)
(Con)
In Derby city we are currently looking at alternative ways
of giving to homeless people, such as vouchers, an app, or
through a website. Will the Minister consider looking at
these alternative giving methods to see whether it is
possible to take them forward?
-
Mr Jones
My hon. Friend makes a very good point. It is generally for
members of the public to consider the way in which they
might want to give to homeless people. As I have said a
number of times today, the Government are absolutely
focused on helping rough sleepers. The £10 million being
put into the social impact bond will help some of the most
entrenched rough sleepers off the street, and I am sure
that is what we all want to see.
Pub Closures: Permitted Development Rights
-
Mr (Luton South)
(Lab/Co-op)
13. What assessment he has made of the effect of permitted
development rights on pub closures. [908154]
-
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Communities
and Local Government (Andrew Percy)
Pubs are at the heart of community life. That is why we
have made provision for assets of community value to be
placed on the register by communities that value their pub.
That takes away the permitted development rights
automatically.
-
Mr Shuker
The co-operative pub model is saving valuable locals right
across the country, but the asset of community value
designation process that the Minister mentions, which
enables this in the first place, can often be far too
clunky and lengthy. Would not a better approach be to
remove permitted development rights and protect all pubs by
default?
-
There are now already in excess of 1,750 pubs listed as
assets of community value. The moment a nomination goes in,
the permitted development rights are removed. Moreover,
local authorities are free, if they wish, to apply for an
article 4 direction to remove those rights across a whole
area.
-
(Leeds North West)
(LD)
As the hon. Gentleman now knows, the Minister for Housing
and Planning was misled by the British Beer and Pub
Association about the fact that removing permitted
development rights would not have any effect on
improvements to pubs, so will the Department now confirm
that it would simply change the use class order?
-
As I have made clear, this is an area where we have to
balance competing interests. I am keen to continue looking
at it as I continue in this role. We want to support
community pubs. That is why today I can announce to the
House that we are providing £50,000 of funding to Pub is
The Hub, which will help more pubs to be transformed and to
be valued by their communities. I pay particular tribute to
my hon. Friend the Member for Weaver Vale (Graham Evans),
who has lobbied me quite hard on this.
Private Rented Housing
-
(Wythenshawe and Sale East)
(Lab)
16. What steps he is taking to raise standards in the
private rented sector. [908158]
-
The Minister for Housing and Planning (Gavin Barwell)
We are in the process of introducing banning orders for
serious offenders, civil penalties of up to £30,000, a
database of rogue landlords, and mandatory licensing for
smaller HMOs; and we are banning letting agency fees.
-
Manchester is doing some very innovative work on cracking
down on rogue landlords, but there are issues with the
geographical scope of the licensing scheme. Will the
Minister meet me, the Greater Manchester Combined Authority
and the Residential Landlords Association to see how we can
raise standards together?
-
We have in the past provided £100,000 of funding to
Manchester for this work. I would be delighted to meet the
hon. Gentleman. This is a critical area, and we need to
drive out the rogue landlords so that decent landlords do
not face unfair competition.
-
Mr (Peterborough)
(Con)
Peterborough City Council is just about to commence a
selective licensing scheme to crack down on rapacious slum
landlords and protect vulnerable tenants under the Housing
Act 2004. Will the Minister keep under review the
bureaucratic burden that falls on local authorities? The
whole process, from start to finish, is not timely and
takes far too long.
-
I am very happy to give that undertaking, and to meet my
hon. Friend if he wishes to discuss these matters in more
detail.
Midlands Engine for Growth
-
(Stafford) (Con)
18. What steps he is taking to support the midlands engine
for growth. [908160]
-
The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
(Sajid Javid)
As announced by my right hon. Friend the Chancellor at the
autumn statement, we will shortly publish a midlands engine
strategy. This will include £392 million for our local
growth fund for the midlands engine local enterprise
partnerships.
-
I thank my right hon. Friend, and I was delighted to see
that he led the first ever midlands engine trade mission
last year. Will he update the House on progress on that?
-
My hon. Friend has also done a lot to champion business and
economic growth in the midlands. That first mission—the
trade mission to north America—went well. It went so well
that we went ahead with a second mission—to China—for the
midlands region. My hon. Friend will be pleased to know
that we are working with the Department for International
Trade and other Departments across Government, and we will
shortly publish a midlands engine strategy, reaffirming our
commitment to the area.
Topical Questions
-
Mr (Sheffield South East)
(Lab)
T1. If he will make a statement on his departmental
responsibilities. [908180]
-
The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
(Sajid Javid)
At DCLG, we are starting 2017 as we mean to go on. The
housing White Paper is nearing completion. The Local
Government Finance Bill was published last week and, as we
have heard, it creates the framework for business rate
retention. It also features what my briefing refers to as
discretionary relief on public toilets, which is, I am
sorry to say, not quite what the name suggests.
-
Mr Betts
I will try not to follow the Secretary of State’s joke.
I thank the Minister responsible for the northern
powerhouse for his helpful comments in support of the
Sheffield city region in the last few days. Will the
Secretary of State confirm whether the Government want the
city region deal to go ahead as agreed and that they do not
support this vague concept of a mayor for Yorkshire, which
will not deliver better local services or improve economic
growth and which is, arguably, outwith the legal framework
for mayoral combined authorities contained in the Cities
and Local Government Devolution Act 2016?
-
It is very good of the hon. Gentleman, the Chair of the
Select Committee on Communities and Local Government, to
thank the Minister responsible for the northern powerhouse.
We remain strongly committed to the devolution deal for the
Sheffield city region. We will continue to work with local
leaders, who have proposed a mayoral election for May 2018.
We will also continue to discuss with local partners
proposals for a devolution deal elsewhere in Yorkshire,
including Leeds.
-
(North West
Leicestershire) (Con)
T4. I welcome the Secretary of State’s commitment to
creating a housing market that works for everyone. In my
own local authority area of North West Leicestershire, new
housing starts are now 273% higher than they were in the
year ending September 2010. May I give the Secretary of
State a challenge as he sets out his new housing White
Paper: can we do even better? [908183]
-
The Minister for Housing and Planning (Gavin Barwell)
I hope we can rise to the challenge. If every local
authority was building at the rate that my hon. Friend’s
local authority is building, we would be building 370,000
homes a year. That is a sign that it is possible to build
the homes that this country needs; it just requires the
political will to do it.
-
(Wentworth and Dearne)
(Lab)
My question is for the Secretary of State: where is his
housing White Paper? We were promised it in the autumn. We
were then promised it alongside the autumn statement, then
before the end of the year, and then first thing in the new
year. We were told that it was in the Government’s grid for
publication today. It has been delayed more times than a
trip on Southern rail. I say to the Secretary of State:
what is the problem?
-
The right hon. Gentleman will not have to wait long for the
housing White Paper. When he sees it, he will see that it
does a lot more than happened under the previous Labour
Government. When he was the Housing Minister, I understand
house building fell to its lowest level since the 1920s.
-
The right hon. Gentleman has shown us exactly what the
problem is: the huge gap between the Government’s rhetoric
on housing and their record. Under Labour, we saw 2 million
new homes, 1 million more homeowners and the largest
investment programme in social housing for a generation.
For seven years under Tory Ministers, we have seen failure
on all fronts—higher homelessness, fewer homeowners and
less affordable housing. Even the Housing Minister has said
that affordable housing is “unacceptably low” and “feeble”.
Does the Secretary of State agree, and what is he going to
do in his White Paper to deal with this crisis?
-
Under Labour, we saw housing affordability, measured by
median income compared with the average house price,
double—going up from three and a half times to seven times.
We saw the number of first-time buyers fall by 55%, and the
number of units available for social rent decline by
421,000. That is Labour’s record on housing.
-
Mr Speaker
Order. Short questions and answers, please, because there
is a lot of interest. A single sentence will do.
-
Mrs (Chesham and Amersham)
(Con)
T5. Chiltern and South Bucks District Councils are
preparing a new local plan, and have consulted on the
options for meeting development need using the green belt.
Does the Secretary of State agree with me that green-belt
land is vital to preserving the character of places such as
Chesham and Amersham and the Chilterns area of outstanding
natural beauty, and should not be developed other than in
truly exceptional circumstances? [908184]
-
I agree with my right hon. Friend. The purposes of the
green belt are very clear. It should preserve the setting
and the special character of historic towns—for example,
those in her constituency. Where councils look at the green
belt, they should always make sure that the national
planning policy framework rules are met: the circumstances
must be exceptional, and brownfield land should always be
prioritised.
-
(Cambridge)
(Lab)
T2. The recent publication of the voluntary right-to-buy
pilot schemes for housing association tenants shows that
very few completions were achieved in return for the
enormous time and effort expended. New affordable housing
is a key element in Cambridgeshire’s devolution deal. Will
the Minister promise no distraction from the opportunity
this gives us to build the supply of homes needed in our
area? [908181]
-
Voluntary right to buy provides replacement affordable
housing. The hon. Gentleman should be supporting it,
because it helps people who could not otherwise own their
home to do so and provides new affordable housing.
-
(Aldridge-Brownhills)
(Con)
T8. Earlier this year, the Secretary of State announced an
extra £7 billion fund to expand the Government’s affordable
housing programme. I welcome this, and it will help my
constituents. However, there is also a concern that the
need for new homes will outweigh the need to protect our
greenfield land, so will the Minister assure my
constituents that he remains committed to it? [908187]
-
I absolutely give my hon. Friend that assurance. I
congratulate her on championing brownfield land. The new
brownfield registers that we are introducing will help to
ensure that development is, rightly, focused on brownfield
first.
-
(Neath)
(Lab/Co-op)
T3. Does the Minister agree that available housing
provision is the key to reducing homelessness and that his
Government should look to the Welsh Labour Government’s
legislative pledges of £5.6 million in 2015 and £3 million
in following years to fund affordable homes to rent as well
as to buy? [908182]
-
The hon. Lady will have heard, in the autumn statement, the
Chancellor of the Exchequer adding £1.4 billion to the
affordable housing budget. We are doubling the housing
capital budget over this Parliament. That is not rhetoric,
but proof of our commitment to delivering the housing that
is needed.
-
(Fareham)
(Con)
T9. Together with the starter home land fund, the new
locally led Welborne garden village in Fareham will deliver
new homes and support first-time buyers. Will my hon.
Friend explain how the Government are working with local
authorities to deliver the new garden villages, and will he
agree to visit Fareham to see how the local community will
benefit from this new scheme? [908188]
-
It was a pleasure to announce support for 14 new garden
villages, which will between them provide 48,000 new homes,
and it would be a pleasure to visit my hon. Friend’s
constituency and see the progress being made.
-
(Stoke-on-Trent South)
(Lab)
T6. Stoke-on-Trent City Council is proposing to cut
children’s centres. Does the Secretary of State think that
is acceptable? [908185]
-
Every council needs to provide certain statutory services,
including children’s services. We want to make sure that
every council is properly funded. Stoke-on-Trent council,
like many others, has accepted the four-year settlement,
and that is good news.
-
Karl M?Cartney (Lincoln) (Con)
T10. Labour city councillors in Lincoln are determined to
build homes on the Swanpool floodplain in the heart of our
city, even though a private developer decided that the site
was unsuitable. What message will my right hon. Friend want
to give Labour councillors such as ours who act in such a
reckless manner? [908189]
-
I hope my hon. Friend will understand that I cannot comment
on a specific planning case, but we have strict, clear
rules that say that councils must consider strict tests
under the national planning policy framework that protect
people and property from flooding. Where those tests are
not met, that development should not go ahead.
-
(Feltham and Heston)
(Lab/Co-op)
T7. A year ago, local authorities were hit with a £200
million in-year cut in public health support. The Select
Committee on Health described it as a “false economy” that
will add to future health costs. What impact does the
Minister believe those cuts will have on health
inequalities, and will he meet me and representatives from
Hounslow so that they can raise their concerns about the
impact on children and others in the community? [908186]
-
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Communities
and Local Government (Mr Marcus Jones)
As 25% of Government expenditure takes place through local
government, there will always be situations where funding
has to be reduced. As the hon. Lady knows, the health
budget is being increased by £10 billion across this
Parliament. In terms of public health, I think the cuts she
mentioned equate to about 1% to 2%, which was not ideal. I
am sure that local government is more than able to meet the
challenge.
-
(South Basildon and
East Thurrock) (Con)
While it may be true that Ministers have been in touch with
councils directly hosting proposed new garden villages,
they have not necessarily been in touch with neighbouring
councils, which may be more affected by the proposals than
those hosting the development. May I suggest that Ministers
spread their nets a little wider when deciding which
schemes to promote and, in my case, contact Basildon and
Thurrock Councils as a matter of urgency?
-
My hon. Friend has raised this issue with me outside the
Chamber, and I will make sure that both he and the council
have the information. The scheme has not yet gone through
the planning systems; there will be every opportunity to
address concerns.
-
(Eltham) (Lab)
In 2009-10, there were 40,000 building starts for social
rented homes. Last year that was down to 1,000. Why is
that?
-
The number of socially rented homes declined by 421,000
during Labour’s time in office. Since the change of
Government in 2010, we have invested billions in socially
rented homes, including the additional £1.4 billion that
was announced in the autumn statement.
-
(Bath) (Con)
Last week, Bath received £259,000 of funding as part of the
rough sleeping grant. Will the Minister join me in
endorsing the great work of the council and charities such
as Julian House, the Genesis Trust and Developing Health
and Independence, as they put together those plans to
ensure that no one else ends up with a winter on the
streets?
-
Mr
I certainly endorse my hon. Friend’s comments. That was
exactly what we wanted to achieve with the funding that we
provided: local authorities working with charitable and
third sector organisations to deliver the support that we
need and all want for people who are rough sleeping and
homeless.
-
(Newcastle upon Tyne
Central) (Lab)
Today is Martin Luther King Day, which we have just
celebrated in your state rooms, Mr Speaker, by launching
Freedom City 2017, the year-long festival that commemorates
the 50th anniversary of Dr King’s visit to Newcastle to
receive an honorary doctorate from the university. The
Under-Secretary of State for Communities and Local
Government, the hon. Member for Nuneaton (Mr Jones), the
shadow Minister for diversity, my hon. Friend the Member
for Brent Central (Dawn Butler), the sadly outgoing US
ambassador Matthew Barzun and you, Mr Speaker, all spoke to
King’s great work and the challenges he highlighted of
race, poverty and war. Mr Speaker, you emphasised the need
to champion those values exemplified by King in our House
and also our communities. Does the Minister agree that
Freedom City 2017 provides an excellent opportunity to do
just that?
-
I agree wholeheartedly with the hon. Lady. She is quite
right to point out the importance of Martin Luther King on
this day, which is a celebration of his life and work. We
would all do well to remember what he taught us, and one
thing that he said is that we must live together as
brothers or we all perish as fools. We can all learn from
that, no matter who we are, whether in the US or the UK.
-
Sir (New Forest West)
(Con)
Will the housing White Paper envisage a greater role for
the public sector?
-
I can reassure my right hon. Friend that this Government
want to see everybody get involved in building more homes,
so if he is referring to local councils and their role,
then absolutely: the more people who can get involved in
building the homes we need, the better.
-
(Dulwich and West
Norwood) (Lab)
Councils across the country are highlighting the enormous
gap between what the social care precept raises and the
increased costs of social care as a consequence of the
increase in the minimum wage and increasing needs among the
population, as well as the cuts that they—the councils—are
already having to make. Does the Secretary of State accept
that his approach to social care funding is simply not
credible, and will he commit to taking a different approach
to ensure that people across the country get the care that
they need?
-
We have taken the pressures on our social care very
seriously. The hon. Lady will know from the announcement of
just a few weeks ago about an additional £900 million for
the next two years, which will make a difference. We also
accept that there is more to do.
-
Several hon. Members rose—
-
Mr Speaker
I want to hear the conscience of Christchurch. I call Mr
.
-
Mr (Christchurch)
(Con)
Last summer, the nine Dorset councils submitted a proposal to
my right hon. Friend to establish a combined authority. Will
he ensure that the order establishing that authority is
brought forward in sufficient time to enable the authorities
to be set up on 1 April this year?
-
We have only just received the proposal to which my hon.
Friend refers. We want to make sure that we take the right
amount of time to consider it carefully. Whatever the result,
we will make sure that enough time is allowed for this House
to do its business.
-
(Bristol East)
(Lab)
I welcome the fact that Bristol has been named as one of the
trailblazers for homelessness prevention and is getting
additional money for it. Does the Minister share my concern,
however, that in some cases it is far more attractive for
landlords and developers to move into providing houses in
multiple occupation or emergency accommodation rather than
providing decent, proper family homes?
-
Mr
Yes, I certainly understand the hon. Lady’s point when it
comes to the practice of flipping temporary accommodation for
the uses that she mentions. We hope that the devolution of
the temporary accommodation management fee will make it far
more attractive for people to be able to maintain temporary
accommodation in the way we want it to be provided.
-
(Corby) (Con)
The new garden village at Deenethorpe will bring thousands
more new homes to East Northamptonshire. Will the Minister
reassure my constituents that new infrastructure to support
those new homes will be at the forefront of his mind as this
project progresses?
-
I can absolutely give my hon. Friend that assurance, given
that it is part of the concept of garden villages. More
generally, if we want communities to accept more housing, we
have to make sure that we get the infrastructure in place at
the same time. That is why the Chancellor’s announcement of a
£2.3 billion housing infrastructure fund was so welcome.
-
Several hon. Members rose—
-
Mr Speaker
I am sorry that we have run out of time. I shall, however,
take one more question. I call .
-
(Bradford East)
(Lab)
Last month, I asked the Health Secretary how many local
authority leaders he had met to discuss social care. The
answer was not very positive, so I ask this Secretary of
State how many cash-strapped local authority leaders he is
willing to meet to discuss the real crisis in social care?
-
Mr
I have met a number of local authority leaders in the last
few weeks, as a result of local government finance settlement
consultations. My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State
has done the same, and we will continue to meet local
authority leaders and chief executives to understand the
challenges that they face.
|