Written statement: Return to the Humble Address on Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor - May 21

Minister for Trade (Sir Chris Bryant): I have today laid before the House documents the Government has identified that the House required in the 24 February 2026 Humble Address seeking all papers relating to the creation of the role of Special Representative for Trade and Investment in 2001, the appointment of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, and the advice of officials and Ministers on his suitability and due diligence and vetting conducted.

This statement explains the Government's approach to finding these historic documents, provides an overview of what has been found, explains the approach taken in releasing information and answers the House's specific questions on due diligence and national security vetting.

It has not been a straightforward task to identify the historic documents requested by the House. Twenty-five years ago, Government Departments were largely operating paper-based record keeping systems. We have had to track down files that might potentially contain relevant information, recall these from storage and search files manually.

An added complication lies in changes to the machinery of government. In the period under consideration, the Government's work to support trade and investment was led by British Trade International (BTI), headed by Chief Executive Sir David Wright. BTI reported to a Board chaired by the Minister of State for International Trade and Investment, Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean, and was accountable both to the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry and to the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs.

A committee of senior officials, the Royal Visits Committee (RVC), provided advice to Ministers and the Sovereign on inward and outward official overseas visits by members of the Royal Family. At the time this was chaired by the Cabinet Secretary.

The search focused on files from 1999- 2001 held by the most relevant Departments (the Department for Business and Trade, the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, the Ministry of Defence, and Cabinet Office).

Today, The Government has published 11 documents that show how the role was created and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor was appointed. These include:

• the formal appointment proposal to Ministers;
• evidence that Ministers were content with the proposal;
• internal communications to all trade staff about the role;
• media and press briefing and Q&A materials.

From 1976 to 2001, the Duke of Kent served as Vice-Chairman of the British Overseas Trade Board and then British Trade International, undertaking more than 60 overseas visits in support of British exports. As he approached retirement from that role in 2001, consideration was given to how best to continue the engagement of the Royal Family in trade and investment promotion work.

In February 2000, Sir David Wright put a formal appointment proposal to Ministers, explaining that the Duke of Kent intended to withdraw from his role supporting trade promotion overseas and it was Her late Majesty's wish that the Duke of York should succeed him He set out a proposed role encompassing two or three trade promotion visits overseas per year, visits to UK regions and receiving prominent overseas trade visitors in the UK.

The documents show that officials and Ministers had been considering expanding the role of the Duke of York for some time prior to the formal proposal. In January 2000, the then Foreign Secretary, Robin Cook, agreed that greater use should be made of the then Duke of York.

Media reporting indicates that the Palace announced in December 2000 that the Duke of Kent was stepping down and that the Duke of York would assume his role.

Internal BTI papers illustrate how the proposed role was developed and communicated to staff and to the media, and record that an initial familiarisation programme ran from April 2001, with the role formally announced in October 2001. Documents confirm the role was unpaid, with costs associated with official duties met through standard departmental arrangements and that systems were put in place to oversee the role. Officials established formal processes to assess and approve engagements, taking account of strategic trade and investment priorities, cost, and other government priorities.

It is a longstanding practice across successive administrations that when the Government responds to a Humble Address motion it has a responsibility to consider whether it is in the public interest to place information into the public domain. This is done using the principles of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA), and in line with the Ministerial Code and the resolutions on ministerial accountability, passed by both Houses in 1997.

In line with this, we have redacted documents to remove the bare minimum of personal information and information whose release would prejudice international relations. We have consulted the police to ensure that the release of information does not prejudice their investigation. We have also considered carefully the redaction of information relating to royal communications, mindful of the longstanding convention of confidentiality, which is codified under the Freedom of Information Act, in relation to communications with and on behalf of the Sovereign. In this exceptional circumstance, the Government is releasing Royal communications about the former Duke of York's appointment as Special Representative. Communications with the Royal Household on unrelated topics have been redacted.

I can assure the House that we have proceeded on the basis of the maximum transparency, in accordance with the letter and spirit of the Humble Address.

We have found no evidence that a formal due diligence or vetting process was undertaken. There is also no evidence that this was considered. This is understandable since this new appointment was a continuation of the Royal Family's involvement in trade and investment promotion work following the Duke of Kent's decision to relinquish his duties as Vice-Chairman of the Overseas Trade Board.

The Government is cooperating fully with Thames Valley Police on their investigation into Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and possible misconduct in public office.