“My Ministers will push
forward with significant
reforms to… the criminal
justice system”
- The justice system is in crisis. Despite the Government's
record investment into criminal court capacity there is a
record high and rising caseload. We cannot leave victims – and
those seeking to clear their name – waiting. Justice delayed is
justice denied. Without action, the situation will continue to
spiral far beyond the point of recovery.
- Sir Brian Leveson's report set out a blueprint for
much-needed reform of the criminal courts. This Bill (formally
titled the Courts and Tribunals Bill) is the first step to
putting that blueprint into law and will bring a neglected
service into the 21st century, ensuring timely and
fair justice for all.
What does the
Bill do?
- The Government is working hard to make the courts more
efficient, including investing record sums in the Crown Courts
to empower them to take on as much work and see as many cases
as possible. But these steps alone are not enough. Without
reform, the Crown Court backlogs will continue to rise.
-
Remove the right of defendants to elect for a Crown
Court trial in cases which
can be
heard in
either a
Magistrates' or
a Crown Court
(triable either-way cases). This will streamline the
criminal courts allocation process by ensuring that decisions
about jurisdiction are made solely by the courts, so cases
are heard in the most appropriate venue according
to their severity
and complexity.
-
Extend magistrates' court sentencing powers
up to 18 months for single and multiple triable-either-way
offences, with the potential to increase this to 24 months if
necessary. This will mean more cases are heard in the
magistrates' courts, freeing up Crown Court capacity.
-
Replace the automatic right to appeal against a
conviction or sentence in
magistrates' courts
with a
permission stage,
supporting victims in ensuring they do not have to experience
the trauma of a second trial at appeal. The Bill also
introduces audio recording in
magistrates' courts, saving time and reducing the impact of
appeals on victims and witnesses.
-
Introduce new modes of trial by judge alone in
defined circumstances. Introducing a new tier of the
Crown Court – the ‘Bench Division' – to hear triable
either-way cases likely to receive a custodial sentence of
three years or less, and suitably complex and lengthy fraud
and other financial cases by judge alone. This will enable
cases to be considered appropriately and ensure more serious
cases can be tried by jury.
-
Bring forward measures to prevent victims of sexual
offences being unfairly undermined in the court
room. This includes clearer statutory thresholds
governing the admissibility of sexual behaviour
evidence and previous
allegations of assault.
-
Introduce measures
to strengthen
and clarify
the special
measures available to vulnerable and intimidated
victims and witnesses, to help them
give their best evidence to
the court.
-
Repeal the presumption of parental
involvement to ensure courts prioritise the child's
best interests and adopt an open-minded approach, rather than
starting from a presumption that parental involvement
will further the
child's welfare.
-
Reform the office of the Senior President of
Tribunals, bringing structural alignment with the
courts under the unified leadership of the Lady Chief
Justice. This promotes flexibility, cross-deployment and
effective judicial leadership which can better support career
development, morale and recruitment.
Territorial extent
and application
- The Bill will extend to the whole of the UK, with the
majority of measures applying to England and Wales only.
Key facts
- The Government's modelling (as set out in the Bill's Impact
Assessment), which has been independently verified, shows that
the full
package of
measures in this Bill will deliver
time savings nearing 20 per cent - the equivalent of around
27,000 sitting days – in 2028-29.
Over 80,000
criminal cases
are currently
waiting to be
heard in the
Crown Court. That is more than double the volume
pre-Covid. Without action, the caseload could reach over 200,000
by 2035. Some victims are waiting years for justice –
over 21,000 open cases have already been waiting for more
than a year.
-
For the current financial year (2025-26), the
Government is funding unlimited
sitting days
so that
the Crown
Court can
hear as
many cases as
possible. In the last financial year (2024-25), the
Government funded a record 111,250 sitting days in the Crown
Court, 5,000 more days than funded in 2024 by the previous
government.
-
Current estimates are that there would need to be
around 139,000 sitting days to
keep up
with demand. That level of
system capacity simply does not exist.
-
Cases are open at the Crown Court for 82 per cent
longer than in 2019 -160 days between October and
December 2019 compared to 290 days over the same period in
2025.
-
In 2024, cases relating to ‘triable either way'
offences that were heard in in magistrates' courts were
completed more than four times
faster than those heard in the Crown Court.
-
Over 90 per cent of criminal cases are currently
heard by magistrates' courts, without a jury.
- Following these reforms, the Government expects
that around three-quarters of
trials that
proceed to
the Crown
Court will
continue to
be heard by a jury. This
means a change to less than 1.5 per cent of all criminal trial
cases.
-
Sir Brian Leveson's findings show that jury trials
take twice as long now as they did in 2000. He
estimates that trials without a jury will reduce hearing time
by at least 20 per cent, which he considers to be a
‘conservative' estimate. This
assumption is
consistent with
international evidence.
Data from New South Wales, Australia, shows an average 16 per
cent reduction in trial length for judge-only trials, rising
to around 29 per cent for complex cases. Taken together, the
20 per cent figure is cautious, evidence-based, and firmly
midrange.
-
The amount
of work
the criminal
courts have
to process
is increasing. The number
of arrests has risen by 10 per cent, and the number of cases
arriving
at the Crown Court is up 18 per cent since 2019. This is due to
increased police officer recruitment leading to a higher number
of charges for criminal offences.
-
Criminal cases are becoming increasingly
complex. For example, while relatively recent forms
of evidence (mobile phones, computers and DNA analysis) have
improved justice and fairness, they have also increased the
time that criminal trials take.
-
The former Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales,
The Rt Hon
of Maldon,
KG, PC, DL
said “Only radical change
stands any prospect of
bringing the backlog
within bounds. It is
not fair on defendants,
complainants or witnesses for
trials to come on
years after the case
entered the courts. Delay
of the
sort we
are now
seeing
undermines
the rule
of law.”
-
The Victims'
Commissioner for
England and
Wales, Claire
Waxman OBE, said “A
system that is crippled by endless delays and forces a rape
survivor to wait five or more years for their chance at
justice is indefensible. We are at a tipping point. If we do
nothing, or not enough, victims will give up.”