Tuesday 28 April, 10.15, Boothroyd
Room, Portcullis House
The EFRA and Environmental Audit committees will jointly hold a
pre-appointment hearing with the Government's preferred candidate
to become Chair of the Office for Environmental
Protection(OEP), Dame .
The OEP's remit includes advising public bodies on environmental
law, scrutiny of government policy and receiving complaints from
whistleblowers about the activities of other public bodies. It
can take legal action against government departments and other
public bodies in severe cases.
Dame Helen will be questioned on her experience and suitability
for the role. MPs will quiz the candidate on what her top
priorities for the OEP will be, and about the organisation's
performance and capacity. Dame Helen will be asked how she will
provide leadership and strategic vision for the OEP's board,
ensure good governance, independence, and hold the OEP's
executive to account.
Environmental Audit Committee wrote to the
Government in November to express concern that the job advert
for this role placed too much emphasis on promoting
infrastructure development. This “runs the risk of impinging on
the independence” of the OEP Chair to “constructively criticise
Government policy if they feel it runs contrary to the protection
of the environment”. The Government's response is available here.
Dame Helen's previous roles include Director-General of the
National Trust (2012-2018) and Permanent Secretary of the Home
Office (2010-2012). She is currently Master of Balliol College at
the University of Oxford.
The remuneration for the role is £56,784 for a time commitment of
up to two days a week. The duration of the role is expected to be
four years.
The previous Chair of the OEP, Dame Glenys Stacey, finished her
term in January 2026. She was succeeded by an Interim Chair,
Jullie Hill MBE, who is an OEP board member.
Pre-appointment hearings are held by select committees for
certain public appointments before the appointment is formally
made. The hearings assess the candidate's suitability for the
post. They are usually followed by a report that either
endorses or raises concerns about the
appointment. Committees do not have the authority to stop a
candidate from being offered a post.