Tomorrow, Wednesday 19 November, MP, Minister of State for
Europe, North America and Overseas Territories, will
give evidence to the the House of Lords International Relations
and Defence Committee as part of its ongoing inquiry examining
the UK's future relationship
with the US.
The session will examine key dimensions of the transatlantic
relationship, including foreign policy strategy, defence and
intelligence cooperation, and economic ties. It will also look
ahead to consider the long-term prospects for a stable and
effective partnership.
The session will start at 2.00pm and will be available to
watch live or on demand at Parliament
TV or attend in person in Committee Room 3, Palace
of Westminster.
Questions will include:
- How would you characterise the current state of the UK–US
relationship, and how does the Government define its success? To
what extent does the Government still consider the term “special
relationship” a useful framing for UK–US ties in today's
international environment?
- Would you agree that different threat perceptions in relation
to China and Russia are leading to a divergence in UK and US
strategic priorities, and that this could lead to a rift in the
relationship? What does this mean for the UK approach?
- How confident are you that the US will remain interested in
and committed to the defence of Europe? How should the UK
Government respond to US retrenchment? And what are the
implications for NATO's cohesion and credibility, particularly if
subsequent US administrations continue to take a more
transactional or isolationist approach?
- What are the key current and future UK economic interests
that depend on a strong relationship with the US, and how is the
Government positioning itself to safeguard those interests as US
economic policy becomes more protectionist?
- How do you evaluate the long-term prospects of the UK-US
relationship, and what in your view are the key measures
necessary now to ensure that the partnership continues to be as
effective and trusted in the future as it has been historically?