Inquiry launched on pre-pension income gap support
|
A cross-party committee of MPs has launched an inquiry into the
pre-pension income gap ahead of the impending State Pension age
increase to 67. 60-64 year-olds are the joint poorest age group
among working-age adults aged 25 and over, as some people leave
work early to care for partners or on health grounds despite long
careers but are not old enough to take their State Pension. In
2023/24, 22% of them (876,000 people), were living in poverty.
From April, the...Request free trial
A cross-party committee of MPs has launched an inquiry into the pre-pension income gap ahead of the impending State Pension age increase to 67. 60-64 year-olds are the joint poorest age group among working-age adults aged 25 and over, as some people leave work early to care for partners or on health grounds despite long careers but are not old enough to take their State Pension. In 2023/24, 22% of them (876,000 people), were living in poverty. From April, the Government will phase in a State Pension age increase from 66 to 67 to be complete within two years. The last time the pension age went up from 65 to 66 it led to 100,000 more 65-year-olds in absolute income poverty compared to before. The new Work and Pensions Committee inquiry will examine the reasons for premature retirement, inequality, the impact on pre-pensioner and pensioner poverty of upping the State Pension age and what support to smooth the transition could look like. It comes alongside publication of the Government's response to the Committee's report on Pensioner Poverty. In it, the Government did not commit to an ageing society strategy as recommended by the Committee. Asked to produce an impact assessment for the incoming State Pension age increase, it pointed to the most recent being published in 2013. Committee Chair Debbie Abrahams said, “In our Pensioner Poverty report we called on the Government to create a coherent cross-governmental strategy that would get ahead of the consequences of an ageing society. Its response pointed to a lot of – not unwelcome – standalone policies, but nothing that amounted to a guiding star for all departments for the health of the country as it edges towards retirement. It potentially leaves people exposed to falling between the cracks. “Pre-pensioners are particularly exposed. You could've worked a grueling 45 years as a skilled tradesperson paying taxes only to find yourself short of cash as you limp from day-to-day for more years until the pension payoff. It's only natural that this situation would make you feel a sense of injustice facing hardship having been independent and contributing for decades. “We do not yet know the impact of the State Pension age increase on these people. The Government's last impact assessment on pushing the retirement age to 67 was in 2013, before the damage caused by Covid to the economy and to people's health. “We will be investigating the scale of the need to smooth over this transition period and how it can be done.” In July, the Government has launched a State Pension age Review with the aim of examining the framework for future State Pension age increases. It has not been asked to review the impending pension age change. Inquiry Terms of Reference To give evidence to the Committee's inquiry, please answer any or all of the following questions on the inquiry webpage by 16:00 on 19 December 2025. Characteristics of the cohort
Policy context
Awareness of State Pension age increase
Impact assessment
Mitigations
ENDS Notes to editors
|
