-
Employment Rights Bill will be heard in the Lords today
as the Bill moves one step closer to Royal Assent
-
Tory and Lib Dem amendments attempt to water down day
one protection from unfair dismissal and banning exploitative
zero hours contracts – both hugely popular
across the political spectrum, including with Tory and Lib Dem
voters
-
TUC accuses some in the business community and on
opposition benches of “wilfully misrepresenting” what unfair
dismissal protection means – adding that employers can still
have probation periods for staff
-
Union body says “out of touch” Lords should “step
aside” so government can deliver manifesto commitments on
flagship workers' rights bill
The TUC has today (Tuesday) published new analysis which reveals
more than 2 million workers (2,010,946) would be denied
protection from unfair dismissal if a six-month qualifying period
was implemented before those rights kick in.
The Employment Rights Bill will ensure workers are protected from
being sacked unfairly from day one in the job. It will also ban
exploitative zero-hours contracts by giving workers a right to a
contract which reflects their regular hours.
But it is being delayed by a series of amendments by Tory and Lib
Dem peers, including one that would provide a loophole for
workers to be denied a guaranteed hours contract and another that
would introduce a qualifying period of 6 months for protection
from unfair sackings.
TUC General Secretary Paul Nowak said Lords blocking the Bill
should “step aside” so government can deliver its flagship
workers' rights bill that will improve the lives of millions of
workers – a key manifesto commitment at the last election.
The TUC warns some in the business community – and on the
opposition benches - are “willfully misrepresenting” the policy,
and says employers can still have probation periods for staff,
but they just won't be able to sack staff unfairly.
International outlier
The TUC says the UK has some of the weakest unfair dismissal
protections in the developed world – “leaving workers to shoulder
all the risk while bad bosses get a free pass”.
At present, it is all too easy for employers to dismiss workers
who haven't yet met the two-year threshold to qualify for unfair
dismissal protection. In many cases, bosses can legally terminate
employment simply by issuing the required notice pay and
instructing the worker not to return, without needing to provide
a reason or follow any formal process.
Approximately 8.5m workers, who currently have less than two
years' service with their employer, don't have protection from
unfair dismissal – particularly younger and BME employees.
This is not only unfair but also deters employees from moving
jobs and losing their protections – a barrier to labour market
mobility. Currently, over half of employees aged under 30 (56 per
cent) have been with their current employer for less than two
years.
Hugely popular
Hope Not Hate's recent mega poll reveals huge support across the
public – including with Tory and Lib Dem voters.
The TUC says the Lib Dems and Tories are defying the will of the
public – and their own supporters – by attempting to water down
the Bill.
The polling reveals more than seven in 10 (71%) support workers
being protected from unfair dismissal from the first day in the
job, with less than two in 10 (17%) opposing. This includes over
6 in 10 (64%) Tory supporters and 3 in 4 (74%) Lib Dem
supporters, based on current voting intention.
Separate polling from late last year showed that managers also
backed workers from being protected from unfair sackings.
According to recent polling by the TUC and IPPR, a significant
majority of managers (66 per cent) think giving employees
protection from unfair dismissal on the first day of employment
would have a positive impact on their business.
By contrast only 10 per cent thought day one protection from
unfair dismissal protection would impact negatively.
TUC General Secretary Paul Nowak said:
“The UK has some of the weakest unfair dismissal protections in
the developed world – leaving workers to shoulder all the risk
while bad bosses get a free pass.
“The statutory protection period will do exactly what it says -
protect workers from being sacked unfairly. This is just old
fashioned common sense.
“Employers can still have probation periods for new staff - they
just won't be able fire them unfairly, at will, for no good
reason.
“No one will be surprised that Tory Peers are voting against the
best interests of working people. But Peers across the opposition
benches should be wary of looking out of touch.
“The Lords' amendment gives bad employers the licence to dismiss
people unfairly - that is simply wrong and unjust.
“It's time for Tory and Lib Dem Peers to step aside and stop
blocking stronger rights for millions of workers.”
ENDS
Notes to editors:
- Workers denied protection from unfair sacking:
2,010,946 workers is the number of workers been with their
employer less than six months, sourced from the Labour Force
Survey Q2 2025 figures
- Report on insecure work: https://www.tuc.org.uk/sites/default/files/insecureworkbriefing2025.pdf