The House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee today invites
written submissions to its new inquiry on the effectiveness of
the UK's fiscal framework and its effect on the Government's
fiscal policy.
The inquiry will explore how any future changes – including to
the rules – should be made and what factors should be considered
in doing so. It will consider:
- How the Government should determine the fiscal rules it holds
itself to.
- The Office for Budget Responsibility's (OBR) remit, powers
and approach to producing forecasts, assessments and analyses.
- Working relationships between the bodies within the fiscal
framework.
- The use made of the OBR's outputs by the Government.
In 1997, the Labour Government introduced a set of fiscal rules
designed to promote sustainable public finances over the longer
term. Since 1997 there have been ten sets of fiscal rules, nine
of these since 2008. When the current Government introduced the
latest fiscal rules, it did so without consultation. Past
experience suggests that the rules will at some point be changed
again.
In 2010, the Coalition Government created the Office for Budget
Responsibility (OBR), an independent body tasked with the
publication of economic forecasts and analysis of the public
finances. In November 2023, the OBR began using dynamic scoring
in producing its forecasts, modelling the effects of changing
economic behaviour in response to announced government policy.
There has been much discussion of the rolling nature of the
targets built into the fiscal rules and whether they are
sufficiently binding. Attention has also focused on the so-called
fiscal headroom, the amount by which the Government can increase
spending or cut taxes and remain compliant with its own fiscal
rules.
The committee is seeking answers to the following questions:
- How should the Government determine the fiscal rules that it
holds itself to? If the rules are changed again, should the
Government consult on any proposals? Are there any negative
effects arising from the frequency with which the UK has changed
its fiscal rules?
- What form should any revised fiscal rules take (e.g. rolling
vs. fixed time horizons, point estimates vs. ranges)?
- Does the OBR have the correct remit? Is it being asked to
produce the right forecasts, assessments and analyses with the
right frequency?
- Given the discretion the OBR has with respect to the
methodology underpinning its forecasts, assessments and analyses,
is there sufficient transparency regarding its judgements?
- Is the OBR's use of dynamic scoring sufficiently robust?
- Do the relationships between the main bodies that exist
within the fiscal framework – primarily HMT, HMRC, DWP and the
OBR, but also the Bank of England and the Debt Management Office
– allow each to properly carry out its work?
- What use should the Government make of the OBR's output? Is
the focus on fiscal headroom appropriate or does it unduly
constrain the Government's approach to fiscal policy?
Commenting on the launch of the new inquiry, , Chair of the Economic
Affairs Committee, said:
“The system of managing and overseeing the nation's public
finances is fundamental to all aspects of what the Government
does. Our committee will explore the effectiveness of the UK's
fiscal framework - the role of the Treasury, the fiscal rules,
the OBR and other bodies - and how the Government could improve
it.
“To inform our work we want to hear from as broad a range of
people as possible. If you have a view on any aspect of our
inquiry, look at our call for evidence and let us know what you
think.”
The deadline for the submission of written evidence is
23:59 on Monday 1 December 2025.
Read the call for evidence and find
out how to submit evidence.