Conservatives to force votes on Labour plans to release thousands of rapists and paedophiles early
Tomorrow [Tuesday 20th October], the Conservatives will force votes
on sentencing reforms to keep rapists and paedophiles behind bars.
Labour's new sentencing plan will see over 2,100 rapists, stalkers,
child groomers, and paedophiles have their jail time cut. From 2022
to 2024, an average of 2,564 jailed offenders annually were
sentenced under Standard Determinate Sentences for serious sexual
crimes against children, including rape, grooming, and possession
of indecent...Request free trial
Tomorrow [Tuesday 20th October], the Conservatives will force votes on sentencing reforms to keep rapists and paedophiles behind bars. Labour's new sentencing plan will see over 2,100 rapists, stalkers, child groomers, and paedophiles have their jail time cut. From 2022 to 2024, an average of 2,564 jailed offenders annually were sentenced under Standard Determinate Sentences for serious sexual crimes against children, including rape, grooming, and possession of indecent images. Labour's proposals mean that over 83 per cent of these child sex offenders will serve less time behind bars. These are not minor offenders. They include some of the most harrowing crimes imaginable. The rape of children under 13, sexual assault, grooming, and the possession of indecent images of children. Yet under Labour's Sentencing Bill, thousands of these dangerous offenders could be freed halfway through their sentences and some offenders will serve only a third. Labour's changes will also benefit over 62 per cent of jailed rapists, as 624 of the 994 offenders jailed each year for rape will be eligible for reduced time in prison. In total, 85 per cent of the most serious jailed offenders are included in the reductions – more than 6,500 of the most jailed serious offenders, including rapists, paedophiles, stalkers, violent attackers, and even attempted murderers, will qualify for early release. Importantly these are permanent changes rather than emergency changes to short term prison population challenges. Labour have said “the most serious” offenders will be excluded despite this data highlighting thousands of serious offences being included, in most cases the majority. This follows a wider pattern under Labour's approach to criminal justice. Labour have already freed more than 26,000 criminals through early-release schemes and plans to extend it to tens of thousands more. The Government's own projections show that as many as 43,000 offenders could avoid prison altogether as Labour pushes ahead with plans to scrap all custodial sentences of under 12 months. The Conservative Party is taking action to stop it. We have tabled an amendment to the Sentencing Bill to ensure rapists, stalkers, groomers, and violent offenders stay behind bars. Our amendment would carve out the most serious crimes, including rape, assault by penetration, grievous bodily harm, stalking, and all sexual offences against children, so that they cannot benefit from Labour's early-release provisions. The Conservative Party have also introduced amendments to:
Having only agreed to a national inquiry when Conservative pressure forced their hand, while cutting frontline victim-support services, and freeing tens of thousands of criminals onto our streets, it is crystal clear that this is a government intent on serving criminals, not victims. But our plan goes further. The Conservatives have also announced plans to hire 10,000 new police officers and abolish the Sentencing Council as part of a major crackdown on crime and soft justice. The next Conservative Government will hire 10,000 extra officers, backed by £650 million a year, to rebuild frontline policing. This will enable intensive “hotspot policing” in 2,000 neighbourhoods with the highest levels of violent crime, robbery, and anti-social behaviour – covering around 25 per cent of all serious violent crime nationwide and preventing an estimated 35,000 offences a year. The Home Secretary will gain new powers to set operational priorities directly, removing bureaucratic barriers that prevent intervention. The Conservatives will also abolish the Sentencing Council to stop two-tier justice and end lenient sentences for serious criminals. Created by Labour in 2009, the Sentencing Council is an unelected body responsible for drafting sentencing guidelines used by judges across England and Wales. In recent years, it has produced guidance that undermines equality before the law by proposing that offenders should be treated differently based on personal background or immigration status. A new Conservative Government will transfer responsibility for sentencing guidance to the Lord Chancellor, ensuring sentencing reflects the will of Parliament and public expectations. Taken together, these measures form a comprehensive plan to strengthen the justice system, protect victims, and restore public confidence in law and order. By preventing the early release of serious offenders, improving transparency in sentencing, increasing police presence in high-crime areas, and ensuring accountability in how sentences are set, the Conservative Party aim to create a system that is fair, consistent, and focused on public safety. Dr Kieran Mullan MP, Shadow Justice Minister, said: “Labour's early release plan is a betrayal of victims and a gift to rapists and paedophiles. Keir Starmer is putting criminals before communities and letting predators out early. “Under Labour's plans, thousands of the most serious would no longer be treated as such, an insult to thousands of victims across the country. Anyone who votes for these plans will have to explain exactly why these crimes do not count among the most serious offences. “The Conservatives will fight this moral rot every step of the way, and our fully-funded plan to put an extra ten thousand police officers on the streets will help to restore public order” ENDS Notes to Editors: Labour's Sentencing Bill changes the rules on early release for serious criminals:
Labour is set to release thousands of rapists, stalkers, child groomers, and paedophiles under early release:
17B.2 Sexual assault of a male child under 13; 19D Rape of a female aged under 16; 19E Rape of a female child under 13 by a male; 19G Rape of a male aged under 16; 19H Rape of a male child under 13 by a male; 20B.1 Sexual assault of a female child under 13 – penetration; 20B.2 Sexual assault of a female child under 13; 21.1 Sexual activity with a child under 13 - indictable only; 21.3 Sexual activity with a child under 13 - offender aged 18 or over or age of offender unspecified - triable either way; 22.1 Sexual activity involving a child under 16 - indictable only; 22.3 Sexual activity involving a child under 16 - offender aged 18 or over - triable either way; 23.1 Familial sexual offences (incest) with a child family member aged under 13 - indictable only; 23.3 Familial sexual offences (incest) with a child family member aged under 13 - offender aged 18 or over - triable either way; 23.4 Familial sexual offences (incest) with a child family member aged 13 to 17 - indictable only; 23.6 Familial sexual offences (incest) with a child family member aged 13 to 17 - offender aged 18 or over - triable either way; 71.3 Possess a paedophile manual - triable either way; 86.1 Taking, permitting to be taken or making, distributing or publishing indecent photographs or pseudo photographs of children; 86.2 Possession of indecent photograph of a child; 86.3 Possessing prohibited images of children; 88A Sexual grooming. (Ministry of Justice, Criminal Justice System statistics quarterly: December 2024, 15 May 2025, link; CRD Analysis, 18 October 2025, available on request).
The Conservatives have a credible alternative to protect victims:
Dr Kieran Mullan – Amendment 24 Clause 20, page 37, line 14, at end insert— “(ab) but sections 244ZA(8)(a) and (aa) do not apply to any person convicted of— (a) rape; (b) assault by penetration; (c) rape of a child under 13; (d) assault of a child under 13 by penetration; (e) inciting a child under 13 to engage in sexual activity; (f) paying for the sexual services of a child aged under 13; (g) kidnapping or false imprisonment with the intention of committing a sexual offence; (h) creating or possessing indecent photographs of children; (i) grievous bodily harm; (j) grooming; (k) stalking; (l) causing or allowing the death of a vulnerable child or adult; or (m) death by dangerous driving, and (ac) but sections 244ZA(8)(a) and (aa) cannot come into force until the Secretary of State has consulted on and ensured exclusions for all offences considered to be serious violence, offences against children, sexual offences and domestic abuse offences, and” Member's explanatory statement This amendment would disapply the clause 20 early release provisions of the Bill in relation to those convicted of the offences listed in the amendment, and would require the Secretary of State to consult on and ensure exclusions for those convicted of other serious violent and sexual offence categories. (House of Commons, Sentencing Bill (Amendment Paper), 17 October 2025, link). Other amendments the Conservative Party are putting to the Sentencing Bill:
Dr Kieran Mullan NC8 To move the following Clause— “Victim personal statements (1) The Secretary of State shall, within six months of the passing of this Act, issue revised guidance on the content of victim personal statements. (2) The revised guidance issued under subsection (1) must stipulate that when making a victim personal statement, a victim shall be able to say anything they wish about the defendant, provided it is not contrary to any statutory limitations on free speech, makes allegations of untried criminal conduct or is disorderly language. (3) The court must disregard any prejudicial comments made during a victim personal statement.” Member's explanatory statement This new clause would require the Secretary of State to review how to make victim personal statements less restrictive and clarify what can be included. (House of Commons, Sentencing Bill (Amendment Paper), 17 October 2025, link).
Dr Kieran Mullan NC9 To move the following Clause— “Duty to collect and publish data on sentencing (1) Within 24 hours of the conclusion of the passing of a sentence, the relevant court must provide HM Courts and Tribunals Service (“HMCTS”) with information regarding— (a) the offence category; (b) the sentence length; and (c) such information about the sentenced individual as the Secretary of State may specify in regulations, but which must include— (i) nationality, (ii) sex at birth, (iii) country of birth, (iv) method of entry to the United Kingdom, (v) visa route, (vi) visa status, and (vii) asylum status. (2) HMCTS must collect and record the information set out in subsection (1) in a safe and secure manner. (3) The Secretary of State must publish statistics on the information set out in subsection (1) no less than once every three months.” Member's explanatory statement This new clause would require HMCTS to collect data and other information on sentencing and sentenced offenders, and would require the Government to publish statistics on that data every three months. (House of Commons, Sentencing Bill (Amendment Paper), 17 October 2025, link).
Dr Kieran Mullan NC10 To move the following Clause— “Court transcripts of sentencing remarks (1) All transcripts of sentencing remarks made in the Crown Court must be published within two sitting days of being delivered. (2) All published sentencing remarks must be made freely available, including online.” Member's explanatory statement This new clause would require all sentencing remarks made in the Crown Court to be published and made available to all. (House of Commons, Sentencing Bill (Amendment Paper), 17 October 2025, link).
Dr Kieran Mullan NC11 To move the following Clause— “Prohibited steps orders (1) The Children Act 1989 is amended as follows. (2) In section 8 (Child arrangements orders and other orders with respect to children), in the closing words of subsection (3), after “include” insert “proceedings in the Crown Court or Magistrate's Court under section 10A or”. (3) After section 10 insert— “10A Duty of a sentencing court to make a prohibited steps order in respect of sexual offences (1) This section applies where an offender has parental responsibility for a child and the offender is convicted of a sexual offence involving any child victim. (2) Where this section applies, a court must make a prohibited steps order when sentencing the offender. (3) A prohibited steps order made under this section must— (a) cease to have effect if an offender is acquitted on appeal for the offence in relation to which the prohibited steps order was imposed; and (b) continue to have effect during an offender's licence period after release for the relevant offence. (4) A prohibited steps order made under this section is to be treated for the purposes of section 31F(6) of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 (Proceedings and decisions) as if it were made by the family court.”” Member's explanatory statement This new clause would require the courts to make a “prohibited steps order” (PSO) – preventing a parent from taking a specific action or set of actions regarding their child – after the conviction of a person with parental responsibilities for a sexual offence involving a child victim. (House of Commons, Sentencing Bill (Amendment Paper), 17 October 2025, link).
Dr Kieran Mullan NC12 To move the following Clause— “Unduly lenient sentences scheme: victims (1) The Criminal Justice Act 1988 is amended as follows. (2) In section 36 (Reviews of sentencing), after subsection (2) insert— “(2A) An application may be made to the Attorney General to review any sentence passed by a Crown Court under the terms set out in this section. (2B) An application under subsection (2A) must be made within— (a) one year of the sentence being passed, if the application is made by— (i) the victim of the offence for which the sentence was passed; or (ii) the next of kin of a deceased victim or a victim who lacks capacity; or (b) 56 days of the sentence being passed, if made by any other person. (2C) The Crown Prosecution Service must write to— (a) any victim of any offence for which a sentence has been passed in the Crown Court; or (b) the next of kin of any deceased victim; within 10 working days of a sentence being passed, to provide details of the Unduly Lenient Sentence scheme, the application process for the scheme, and the deadlines set out in subsection (2B) of this section.”” Member's explanatory statement This new clause would extend the deadline for applications to the Unduly Lenient Sentences Scheme from 28 days to 56 days, or for a year for victims of crime (or the next of kin of deceased victims). It would also require the CPS to notify victims about the scheme. (House of Commons, Sentencing Bill (Amendment Paper), 17 October 2025, link).
Dr Kieran Mullan NC16 To move the following Clause— “Whole life order: murder of a police or prison officer (1) The Sentencing Code is amended as follows. (2) In paragraph 2 of Schedule 21 (Determination of minimum term in relation to mandatory life sentence for murder etc), in sub-paragraph (2)(c), after “duty,”, insert “or if the motivation for the murder was connected to the police officer or prison officer's current or former duties,”” Member's explanatory statement This new clause would expand the circumstances in which it is appropriate to apply a whole life order for murdering a prison or police officer, to include murder motivated by the victim's current or former duties. (House of Commons, Sentencing Bill (Amendment Paper), 17 October 2025, link). Labour's Record on Criminal Justice:
The Conservative Party plan to restore law and order in our country and keep the British public safe:
The Sentencing Council attempted to introduce two-tier sentencing guidelines that undermine the principle of equality before the law:
The Conservative Party plan for sentencing guidance
|