-
Government departments have
significant targets to reduce running costs
- At least 8,500 civil servants are expected to leave under
exit schemes planned up to 2027
- The National Audit Office (NAO) sets out expectations for
good practice and value for money in exit
processes
-
Download the Good
Practice Guide: Government exits and redundancies
Many government departments and organisations are implementing
employee exit schemes to reduce staff numbers and cut running
costs. This is aimed at improving efficiency and delivering
better value for taxpayers.
To aid government departments and organisations, the NAO has
created guidance to assess how exits and redundancies in
government are being conducted, which includes expectations for
how exit processes should be carried out.
The 2025 Spending Review set target reductions for all
departments' administration budgets of at least 11% in real terms
by 2028-29, and 16% by 2029-30.
Government employers are making large-scale or ‘bulk' staff
reductions using established schemes for voluntary exits,
voluntary redundancies, and compulsory redundancies.
Over 8,500 civil servants are expected to leave under current
exit schemes up to the end of March 2027, at a cost of £536
million. More exits and redundancies are expected to be
announced, both in the civil service and wider public
sector.
Mutually agreed exits
The government announced in March 2025 the introduction of a
mutually agreed exits procedure for civil service staff,
described by the responsible Cabinet Office minister as “giving
managers more tools to address substandard performance”.
This type of scheme is used in the private sector and the NHS,
and allows employees to leave in specific situations, such
as:
Skills mismatch: When someone's job isn't at risk, but they don't
have the skills needed for the role going forward.
Poor performance: When someone's performance regularly dips and
isn't likely to improve soon.
Broken working relationships: When things like repeated
grievances have damaged the working relationship beyond
repair.
The Cabinet Office is currently conducting a pilot of mutually
agreed exits with nine departments and arm's-length bodies. It
approves all applications for mutually agreed exits and will
monitor the use of the process when it is introduced more widely
to the civil service.
Challenges for government
Government departments and organisations face significant
challenges in designing and implementing exit schemes. The NAO
has identified the following six challenges which relate to the
impact on organisational and workforce capability, and the value
for money of the schemes. These include:
-
1. Delivering with fewer
people
How can organisations keep running
smoothly even with smaller teams?
-
2. Retaining top talent
while enabling poorer performers to
leave
How can organisations ensure
decisions on who to keep and who can leave are based on
effective performance management
arrangements?
-
3. Supporting everyone
through change
How can organisations meet the needs
of both those leaving and those
staying?
-
4. Minimising exit and
redundancy costs
How can organisations reduce the
financial impact of staff exits and
redundancies?
-
5. Thinking beyond
individual organisations
How can organisations take a
joined-up, government-wide approach to exits and
redundancies?
-
6. Ensuring longer-term
value for money
How can organisations make sure
today's decisions offer long-term value for
money?