-
Bank of England quantitative easing
losses are costing taxpayers £22 billion every
year
-
Commercial banks' share prices have
doubled since the inflation crisis – fuelled by taxpayer-funded
windfalls
-
IPPR proposes a Thatcher-style tax
on bank profits to raise up to £8 billion a
year
The Treasury should bring in a new tax
on commercial banks to address the unintended consequences of
quantitative easing (QE), says the Institute for Public Policy
Research (IPPR).
The UK taxpayer is spending £22
billion a year compensating the Bank of England for losses on its
QE programme, public money which is partly being funneled to
commercial bank shareholders.
The think tank says that this subsidy
of commercial banks, at the expense of public services, is
boosting bank profits while millions face the cost-of-living
crisis. Since interest rates began rising in December
2021, the four largest UK banks
have seen their annual profits more than double,
up by £22 billion compared to
pre-pandemic. IPPR says that some of this is a direct transfer of
funds from the taxpayer to
shareholders.
Under the current set-up, the Treasury
pays the Bank of England for both interest rate losses and the
drop in value of gilts bought during QE. These payments
ultimately benefit commercial banks, and other financial
institutions, which hold hundreds of billions of pounds of
QE-related reserves at the Bank of
England.
The UK is an international outlier in
having its Treasury pay for its central banks losses. To rectify
this, IPPR recommends that:
-
The Treasury introduces a QE
reserves income levy on commercial
banks, in a similar vein to
Thatcher's 1981 deposit tax on banks, to save £7-8 billion a
year over this parliament
-
The Bank of England slows down
quantitative tightening (QT), by ending the Bank of England's fire sale of government
bonds to save more than £12bn a
year
IPPR says these two policies could
save the taxpayer over £100 billion over the course of this
parliament giving the government much needed fiscal headroom and
allowing them to support households.
Carsten Jung, associate director for
economic policy at IPPR, said:
“The Bank of England and Treasury
bungled the implementation of quantitative easing. What started
as a programme to boost the economy is now a massive drain on
taxpayer money. Public money is flowing straight into commercial
banks' coffers because of a flawed policy design. While families
struggle with rising costs, the government is effectively writing
multi-billion-pound cheques to bank
shareholders.
“This is not how QE was meant to work
– and no other major economy does it this way. A targeted levy,
inspired by Margaret Thatcher's own approach in the 1980s, would
recoup some these windfalls and put the money to far better use –
helping people and the economy, not just bank balance
sheets.”