- The richest 4 per cent are on track to emit 22 times more
carbon from their travel than the poorest in coming decade
- Current policy risks missing climate targets, increasing
traffic and worsening emissions inequality
- IPPR proposes a fairer pathway: reforming transport taxes,
investing in public transport, and cutting excess flying
New analysis from the Institute for
Public Policy Research (IPPR) warns that domestic travel
emissions inequality is set to worsen dramatically over the next
decade, despite overall emissions
falling.
Growing emissions inequality is driven
by the largely unrestricted mobility of affluent groups, who
travel six times further a year on average than those on the
lowest incomes.
The richest 4 per cent of UK
households are on course to emit 13 times more carbon than the
poorest 14 per cent from their domestic travel by 2035 – up from
a tenfold gap today.
If you include international travel,
the richest are expected to emit 22 times more than the poorest –
up from 20 times today.
The think tank finds that the poorest
in society are on track to cut their emissions the quickest, and
the wealthiest will remain the highest emitters in absolute
terms, despite their ability to afford new electric vehicles
(EVs).
Additionally, while the wealthiest
will benefit from lower transport costs due to cheaper EV running
costs, the lowest income groups face rising costs as public
transport fares continue to
increase.
The government's current approach
places minimal demands on high emitters and fails to address the
widening gap in domestic transport
emissions.
Under existing policy, traffic is
projected to rise by 12 per cent by 2035. In contrast, IPPR's
proposed ‘fairer pathway' would reduce traffic by 25 per cent,
cut emissions faster, and improve access to transport for
low-income households.
The pathway targets excess car use and
domestic flying among the wealthiest, while expanding public
transport and active travel options for all. Crucially, it also
calls for reducing the need to travel by improving access to
jobs, services, and amenities locally, especially for those
currently locked into car dependency.
It places greater responsibility on
those who contribute most to emissions and have the greatest
resources to change their travel habits, ensuring that climate
action benefits everyone.
Key recommendations
include:
-
Invest in public
transport: increase
funding for buses to at least £3.1 billion and capital spending
on active travel to at least £2 billion a year by
2030
-
Reform fuel taxation to
support the transition from fossil fuels:
Gradually increase fuel duty and
Vehicle Excise Duty to reflect the environmental costs of
petrol and diesel use
-
Pause expansion of airports
and major roads: Introduce a moratorium on new airport capacity and
large-scale road building
Stephen Frost, head of
transport policy at IPPR,
said:
“The richest households are
driving the bulk of emissions, and they have the greatest
capacity to change. Fairness isn't a barrier to climate action –
it's the key to unlocking it. A fairer approach doesn't just cut
carbon faster, it builds a healthier, more inclusive transport
system for everyone.”
ENDS
NOTES TO
EDITORS
-
This analysis is based on travel
behaviour data from the England National Travel Survey and the
Scottish Household Survey, covering the years 2013 to 2021. The
data has been weighted to ensure it is representative of the
Welsh and Northern Irish populations, providing full UK
coverage. The modelling reflects known limitations in survey
methods, meaning the actual divide between the most and least
mobile groups is likely even greater. The analysis also
includes a qualitative assessment of how different income
groups are likely to respond to current policy and the Climate
Change Committee's Seventh Carbon Budget
advice.
-
Our transport profiles show how
the average
domestic transport emissions of
people matching each profile change over time, under different
scenarios. People matching our profiles will be reducing their
emissions at different rates. For example, some members of our
most affluent group will be cutting their emissions from domestic transport faster
than others, for example by buying an EV, but the average for
the group remains high because many of its members are not
reducing their emissions at all (or may actually be increasing
them).