Today [Wednesday 6th of August], the Conservatives have exposed the
utter failure of Labour's latest Channel migration surrender deal
within hours of it being announced. Labour claimed the deal would
act as a deterrent, yet we already know this deal is unworkable and
wide open to abuse. And the truth was laid bare when the Shadow
Home Secretary, Chris Philp MP, travelled out to sea this morning
and saw with his own eyes what this deal really delivers. Within
just half an...Request free trial
Today [Wednesday 6th of August], the Conservatives
have exposed the utter failure of Labour's latest Channel
migration surrender deal within hours of it being announced.
Labour claimed the deal would act as a deterrent, yet we already
know this deal is unworkable and wide open to abuse. And the
truth was laid bare when the Shadow Home Secretary, MP, travelled out to sea this
morning and saw with his own eyes what this deal really delivers.
Within just half an hour aboard a fishing vessel off the coast,
witnessed two separate dinghies
carrying illegal migrants making their way into UK waters,
completely unimpeded.
But what he saw next was worse, as French authorities actively
escorted the small boats into the Channel. Rather than stopping
the crossings, they are supervising them.
And in one of the most shocking revelations yet, French officials
were observed collecting discarded life jackets from migrants,
seemingly for reuse. The people-smuggling conveyor belt is now a
round trip, paid for by British taxpayers.
This damning trip proved Labour's deal is a surrender document.
There are no numbers specified, presumably because they are so
small they would embarrass the Home Secretary. France won't even
tell us any information about who we have to accept back, so they
could be criminals or terrorists, and we wouldn't know.
Even a “clearly unfounded” human rights claim will stop a return
to France while it goes through a lengthy court process.
And if Labour is only returning just 6 per cent of illegal
immigrants, as reported, it will have no deterrent effect
whatsoever - because 94 per cent get to stay.
It is no wonder the Labour Government has presided over the worst
channel crossing figures in history. Today proves they have
learned nothing.
Only the Conservatives, under new leadership, have a credible
plan to stop the crossings, restore control, and end the chaos
with our Deportation Bill.
MP, Shadow Home Secretary,
said:
“On the very day Labour's flagship Channel deal was meant to kick
in, I watched French ships escort illegal immigrants straight
into British waters.
“Labour's migrant surrender deal with France is in shambles and
today has proven that it will have no deterrent effect
whatsoever.
“Only the Conservatives, under new leadership, have a serious
plan to stop the boats, restore control, end the chaos with our
Deportation Bill, and reform to close the loopholes fuelling this
crisis.”
ENDS
Notes to editors:
Measures in the agreement:
-
The UK-France agreement does not contain any numbers of
how many illegal migrants the UK can send back to
France (UK Government, Agreement, 29 July
2025, archived).
-
Article 4(1)(e) says anyone who has made a claim the
Home Office has certified as “clearly unfounded” does not get
sent back to France, creating a loophole for lawyers to delay
removal months or years while lengthy court
proceedings take place. ‘France shall
readmit, upon application by the United Kingdom and without
further formalities to be undertaken by the United Kingdom
other than those provided for in this Agreement, relevant
Third-Country Nationals, who upon arrival through a dangerous
journey, do not, or no longer, fulfil, the conditions for entry
to, presence in, or residence in the territory of the United
Kingdom, provided that the following criteria are met… the
United Kingdom confirms that at the time of their transfer that
person will not have an outstanding human rights claim (which
shall include a Third Country National with a human rights
claim that has been certified under United Kingdom law as
clearly unfounded).'
- Problems will arise spurious human rights claims which will
have to go through the whole lengthy court process before the
person is removed and modern slavery claims, which have a low
threshold for acceptance, a long lead time for decision and are
suspensive of removal.
-
Article 4(1)(b) says that only an adult or accompanied
minor to be eligible to be returned to France. France
shall readmit, upon application by the United Kingdom and
without further formalities to be undertaken by the United
Kingdom other than those provided for in this Agreement,
relevant Third-Country Nationals, who upon arrival through a
dangerous journey, do not, or no longer, fulfil, the conditions
for entry to, presence in, or residence in the territory of the
United Kingdom, provided that the following criteria are met…
the United Kingdom confirms that at the time of their removal
they will be determined by authorised officers to be an adult
or an accompanied minor.'
-
Labour's Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill
would repeal the Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Act
2024 and repealing most of the Illegal Migration Act
2023. The repeals to the Illegal Migration Act
include:
o Removing the duty on the Home Secretary to
make arrangements to remove persons to their home country or a
safe third country who entered or arrived in the UK illegally.
o Allowing illegal migrants to obtain British
citizenship.
o Asylum seekers will no longer be treated as
over 18 if they refuse to take a scientific age assessment (UK
Parliament, Border Security, Asylum and Immigration
Bill, 30 January 2025, link).
-
Article 9 says that the UK will have to accept migrants
back if a court of tribunal finds the original transfer (to
France) was unlawful or orders that the individual to be
transferred back. ‘If, after an individual to
whom this Chapter II applies has been transferred, and either
of the following circumstances arise, the Parties shall
cooperate and take all reasonable steps to arrange the transfer
of the individual back to the territory of the other Party: a.
a court or tribunal in a final determination (ie one where the
time to appeal a decision has expired without an appeal being
lodged or where no further appeal is possible) finds the
original transfer executed under this Agreement was unlawful in
that particular individual's circumstances; b. a court or
tribunal orders that the individual is transferred back.'
-
Article 11 says that the UK will pay to send everyone
back to France. ‘All transport costs incurred in
connection with readmission pursuant to this Agreement shall be
borne by the United Kingdom up until handover points.'
-
Article 16 says France will not give us any data on the
people they are sending to the UK. ‘For the avoidance
of any doubt, under no circumstances shall personal data be
transferred from France to the United Kingdom.'
-
2025 has been the worst year ever for small boat
crossings with over 25,000 people crossing the Channel this
year alone. Since Labour entered government, over
48,000 people have crossed the Channel, leaving Labour's ‘smash
the gang' policy in tatters. (Home Office, Small
Boat Arrivals, 04 August 2025, link).
-
Under this Labour Government, we are on track for
50,000 illegal immigrants to cross the Channel in 2025
alone.Analysis from The Times, using similar
modelling as previous Border Force methods to estimate future
arrivals, has forecast that a total 50,000 crossings will be
made in 2025 (The Times, 2 June 2025, link).
-
Keir Starmer's only idea to stop the small boats crisis
will see just 50 migrants returned to France each week,
equating to a '17 in, 1 out' deal. has agreed to return one
illegal immigrant for every 17 that enter the country, equating
to France taking back just 800 illegal immigrants against
44,000 who have entered the country since Labour won the
General Election last year (The Telegraph, 10 July
2025, link).
- The ex-head of border force says the
one-in-one-out deal with France won't make a dent.
TONY SMITH: We've got this fantastic
new breakthrough with France. [….] You know, they're going to
start taking boat people back and I'm really, really worried
actually that that is going to be the same thing. They're going
get a load of spinner ash, it's not going to make a dent in the
problem that we're all facing. (TalkTV, Morning Glory with
Mike Graham, 27 June 2025, archived)
-
Removals of small boats arrivals are down since the
last quarter under the Conservatives – Labour are only removing
5 per cent of arrivals. 2024 Q3 – 572 small boat
removals compared to 11,755 small boat arrivals. 2024 Q4 - 588
compared to 11,572 arrivals. 2025 Q1 - 482 compared to 6,642
arrivals (Home Office, Accredited Official Statistics,
22 May 2025, link).
-
The number of asylum seekers being housed in hotels is
still higher than when the Conservative Government
left office. The number of asylum seekers being housed
in hotels by 31 March 2025 was 32,345. The number of asylum
seekers being housed in hotels by June 2024 was 29,585 (Home
Office, Accredited Official Statistics, 22 May 2025,
link).
-
The National Crime Agency said stopping Channel
migrants is ‘not possible without Rwanda-style
scheme'. The National Crime Agency said: ‘They just
keep popping up – all you need is a phone and a dinghy which
aren't illegal items. The NCA position is that you need an
effective removals and deterrence agreement,' the law
enforcement source added. ‘No country has ever stopped people
trafficking upstream in foreign countries – the Australians
have done it but that was with a deportation scheme' (The
Daily Telegraph, 12 September 2023, link).
-
Former Chief Immigration Officer, who retired in 2016,
Kevin Saunders, said a big deterrent is needed to stop migrant
crossings. Speaking to Sky News, Saunders
said: ‘What the United Kingdom actually needs is a big
deterrent and everybody has told the Prime Minister this. You
need a big deterrent to stop the migrants. Forget about the
gangs, if you stop the migrants wanting to come to the UK, the
gangs won't exist' (Sky News, 4 November 2024,
link).
-
The Conservatives would pass the Deportation Bill – a
bold, no-nonsense plan to take back control of our borders and
fix the broken immigration system. The measures
include automatically deporting anyone who arrives in the
country illegally, disapplying the Human Rights Act from all
immigration-related matters, doubling the residency requirement
for Indefinite Leave to Remain from five to ten years, and
introducing a legally binding Parliament-voted annual cap on
migration (Independent, 6 May 2025, link).
-
Labour are effectively cutting the Home Office budget,
with average annual real-terms growth slashed by 2.2 per
cent. The Total Departmental Expenditure Limits
of the Home Office between 2023-24 to 2028-29 mean that average
annual real-terms growth slashed by 2.2 per cent (HMT,
Spending Review, 11 June 2025, link).
-
pledged to end the use of
asylum hotels by 2029, saving the taxpayer £1 billion per
year. REEVES: ‘Funding that I have provided
today, including from the Transformation Fund, will cut the
asylum backlog, hear more appeal cases, and return people who
have no right to be here, saving the taxpayer £1 billion per
year' (Spending Review, 11 June 2025, archived).
-
This raises questions of where these illegal migrants
will be moved to instead, most likely to social housing
instead. Whilst the Chancellor promised to end the use
of asylum hotels, they will most likely be moved into social
housing – which received an uplift of £39 billion over the next
decade (HMT, Spending Review 2025, 11 June 2025,
link).
|