Key findings:
-
Almost 9 in 10 companies believe the original HS2 plan
to Leeds and Manchester should be resurrected, according to a
new survey from Make UK and Barclays UK Corporate
Bank
-
A similar number back high speed rail between the major
Northern cities
-
Almost two thirds of companies say increased rail
investment would improve access to labour
-
Lack of access to local terminals cited as a barrier by
almost 4 in 10 companies
-
More than 6 in 10 companies say Government should
prioritise multi modal systems to increase rail use
Britain's manufacturers believe the original plan for a high
speed rail line reaching Leeds and Manchester should be
resurrected as part of a major strategic investment in the rail
network to significantly increase passenger capacity and thereby
free up capacity for rail freight on existing lines.
The call comes on the back of a major survey on rail investment
and logistics published today by Make UK and Barclays UK
Corporate Bank. It shows that almost 9 in 10 companies (89%)
believe the original high speed rail line should still go ahead,
while a similar number believe there should be greater investment
in faster connections between the big Northern cities of
Liverpool, Manchester, Sheffield, Hull and Newcastle.
According to Make UK, this investment is essential if the
Government is to meet its target of increasing rail freight by
three quarters by 2050 while, at the same time, reducing carbon
emissions from the estimated 12 million journeys which will be
carried out by lorries in 2050.
In addition, Make UK believes targeted investment in the UK's
freight infrastructure could unlock major economic benefits by
expanding rail capacity and improving connectivity. Linking the
UK's largest port at Felixstowe through the Oxford-Cambridge Arc
— which, together with London, forms the “Golden Triangle” of
universities and centres of research and innovation — and onward
via HS2 to Birmingham, Liverpool, and Manchester, could recoup
much of the value spent on HS2 already, while also driving
economic growth across the regions and contributing towards Net
Zero decarbonisation. Inspired by successful models in France,
the creation of logistics hubs at strategic locations across this
industrial spine — such as such as Ely Junction and
Trafford Park — could unleash economies of scale by improving
access to skills and innovation across the country.
Commenting, Verity Davidge, Director of Policy at Make UK, said:
“It's clear that the current levels of rail capacity aren't
suitable for the levels of freight traffic the Government is
predicting in the future. As a result, if industry is to make
greater use of rail then we need the extra capacity which a high
speed link for passenger traffic would free up. This would
provide a valuable opportunity to invest in multi mode hubs which
would improve connectivity between our major ports and better
integrate road and rail routes through the spine of the country.”
Lee Collinson, Head of Manufacturing, Transport and Logistics at
Barclays UK Corporate Bank, said:
“It's important that UK transport infrastructure is at the
forefront of discussions among policymakers. Upgrading and
integrating our road, rail, and port systems is crucial for
boosting productivity, decarbonising transport, and supporting
long-term competitiveness. By addressing key barriers and
enhancing rail freight, we can achieve significant environmental
benefits, reduce lorry journeys, and improve road safety. We're
excited to work with industry bodies like Make UK as we deliver
for the sector, going beyond numbers and supporting its plans for
growth.”
The survey provides a wide-ranging view of how manufactures
currently manage their logistics operations and how, with the
right investment, the use of rail could be improved with the
benefits of greater access to labour and reductions in emissions.
Currently, road is overwhelmingly the main mode of transport for
nine in ten (89%) of manufacturers, with six in ten (59%)
regarding road investment as critical for their just in time
operations. This compares to just under half (46%) for port
investment and just under four in ten (38%) rail.
The survey shows that the biggest deterrence to making greater
use of rail for freight is cost for just under half (45%) while
low volumes (42%) and lack of access to local terminals (39%) are
also cited. As current policies stand, the use of rail is being
actively discouraged given the cost per tonne in miles for rail
has increased by 10% in the last decade compared to just 3% for
road.
However, conversely a third of companies (31%) say rail should be
the priority for transport investment, while almost two thirds
(61%) say Government should prioritise investment in multi modal
transport hubs (ie ensuring ports, road and rail have greater
connectivity) to increase the use of rail for freight.
According to Make UK, making greater use of rail for freight
would not just reduce emissions and help manufacturers meet their
ESG targets, it would bring greater access to a wider pool of
labour (62%) while a similar number said it would encourage them
to invest more in skills and capital expenditure.