Following the UK’s accession to the
Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific
Partnership (CPTPP) on 16 July 2023, the House of Lords
InternatioInal Agreements Committee has today launched an inquiry
into the accession.
The committee’s previous
report on
negotiating objectives outlined the case for accession, citing
the economic benefits, but also raised concerns over certain
agricultural, environmental and geopolitical issues. The
committee’s new inquiry will focus on if and how these issues
were resolved, and the outlook for the UK’s future participation
in CPTPP.
Questions the committee is seeking
evidence on include:
-
What is your view of the overall
likely economic benefit of CPTPP for the UK?
- What is your view of the agricultural market access it gives?
- How might UK manufacturers and consumers gain or lose from
the CPTPP provisions on cumulation of origin?
- How far does it provide UK services firms with new market
access
- Has the NHS been protected?
- What are the implications of CPTPP for the UK’s domestic
environmental policies and regulations
- What is the potential impact of the agreement on the devolved
administrations?
- What are your views on the likely future development of the
CPTPP and how this could affect the UK?
The committee invites interested
individuals to submit written evidence by
4pm on Friday 22 September
2023. The full call
for evidence and further information is available on the
committee’s website.
, Chair of the International
Agreements Committee said:
“In 2021, the committee published a
report scrutinising the Government’s negotiating objectives for
this agreement, in which we discussed the case for accession and
highlighted some concerns. We are pleased that an agreement has
been concluded and are hopeful that joining the partnership will
be beneficial for the UK. However, we are keen to find out if our
concerns have been resolved in the UK’s terms of
accession.
“We would like to know more about the
economic benefits and disadvantages of the agreement, its
agricultural and services provisions, its effect on
manufacturers, and the impact on environmental protection, among
other issues. We hope the evidence we receive will allow us to
draw conclusions on the real benefits and pitfalls of the
treaty.
“We encourage a wide range of
individuals and organisations to come forward and submit evidence
to help inform our inquiry, so we can hold the Government
accountable in ensuring that the best possible deal has been
secured for the UK and that any concerns have been addressed
sufficiently.”