The government’s failure to
meaningfully address the climate and nature crises and support
farmers risks the UK being unable to produce enough of its own
food, according to a new report from the Institute for Public
Policy Research (IPPR).
The climate and nature crises are
having a direct impact on farmers and food production in the UK.
Livestock are increasingly exposed to heat stress, growing
seasons are changing, pests and diseases are living longer in
warmer winters, droughts are impacting crop growth and flooding
is affecting soil runoff, erosion, and harvesting.
This comes as record temperatures in
the UK last year caused widespread damage to crops, causing
significant economic loss to the farming industry, and posing
risk to food security.
The think tank’s analysis also shows
that:
-
The UK’s food system is
too wasteful, is
skewed towards highly processed food and is environmentally
damaging
-
Food poverty is an
increasing problem with lower-income households disproportionately
affected by food price rises and less able to afford a good
diet
The use of land in the UK needs to
change, says the report, but responsibility for the transition to
climate and nature-friendly farming cannot be left to farmers
alone. They are already grappling with a system that does not
fairly reward them for their produce.
The report calls for a long-term
vision for the future of land and agriculture, which must reflect
the views of those who work in farming as well as consumers. In
this vein, its findings are informed by several community panels
- convened by IPPR in Somerset, Cumbria and Kent - on how to
tackle the climate and nature crises in way that is fair to
farmers, farm workers and the public.
The panels called for the government
to take a greater leadership role within the food system,
including by providing a long-term funding settlement to support
the changes needed. They also urged greater promotion of local
food, and steps to cut out unnecessary transport, processing and
packaging.
The report says a “significant shift”
is needed to ensure the UK’s food security, with “robust
intervention” by the government, including to support farmers in
the transition.
It urges a comprehensive industrial
strategy for food and farming to ensure the UK’s food security and also meet net zero
targets. This must involve:
-
Strengthening trade deals
so that food imports are produced
to the same standards as domestic produce – including
environmental safeguards, animal welfare and food safety
standards, and workeres’ rights.
-
Creating food partnerships
in local areas to increase the
market for nutritious, nature and climate-friendly
food.
Measures such as these can ensure the
UK meets its legally binding climate targets, while ensuring food
security for generations to come.
Lesley Rankin, co-author of
the report and researcher at IPPR,
said:
“The climate and nature crisis poses
one of the greatest risks to the UK’s domestic food production,
and the UK government has consistently failed to treat this
threat with the urgency it deserves.
“If we are serious about ensuring food
security and leaving our environment in a better state than we
found it for generations to come, it is crucial we act
immediately and involve farmers and communities every step of the
way.
“The evidence is crystal clear:
protecting our planet, boosting farmers’ livelihoods and food
security go hand-in-hand. Now it’s on the government to act to
put us on a path that provides a better life for us
all.”
Luke Murphy, co-author of the
report and head of the fair transition unit at IPPR,
said:
“The lack of a government strategy for
our food and farming sector has serious
consequences.
“It’s undermining our ability to
produce food domestically, making farmer’s lives harder, and
entrenching a food system that is wasteful, bad for our health,
and damaging to the environment.
“The government must provide long-term
financial support for the transition, and strengthen trade policy
to guarantee environmental and worker standards. It must protect
British farmers from being undercut by food produced to lower
standards abroad.”
ENDS