Statement from Jamie Arrowsmith, Director of Universities UK
International, in response to the written ministerial statement
issued a short time ago by the Home Office.
“International students make an invaluable contribution to our
universities and to the UK’s economy. Building on the
government’s explicit commitments and ambitions, which were
clearly set out in the International Education Strategy, we have
seen significant growth since 2019. Our research shows that
international students make a huge economic contribution to the
UK, with a single cohort delivering a total benefit of £41.9
billion. We also know that the public are overwhelmingly
supportive of the international students we attract – just
9% of people think we should
be discouraging international students from choosing the
UK.
“Today’s announcement provides some clarity for students and
universities after many months of rumour and speculation; but
leaves some questions unanswered. The government has reaffirmed
its commitment to sustainable growth and to the ambitions set out
in the International Education Strategy. Confirmation that the
Graduate route will remain open and competitive is critically
important, as it means international students can remain in the
UK and work for up to two or three years after completing their
studies, gaining experience and helping to address critical
skills shortages.
“The rise in the number of dependent visas has been substantial
and has likely exceeded planning assumptions in government. We
recognise that, in some places, this has led to local challenges
around access to suitable family accommodation and schooling,
with implications for the student experience. Given this, some
targeted measures to mitigate this rise may be reasonable, for
example looking at eligibility for particular types of course
(such as one-year taught postgraduate programmes) or enhancing
the financial assurances that prospective students are required
to provide.
“While the vast majority of students will be unaffected by
proposals that limit the ability to be accompanied by dependents,
more information is needed on the programmes that are in scope
before a proper assessment of the impact can be made. Yet we do
know that any changes are likely to have a disproportionate
impact on women and students from certain countries. We therefore
urge the government to work with the sector to limit and monitor
the impact on particular groups of students – and on
universities, which are already under serious financial
pressures. The review process that has been announced must
consider these issues.
“Ultimately, our collective aim must be to ensure that
international students who choose the UK can be confident that
they are welcome here, that their contribution is valued, and
that the terms on which they have made decisions remain stable.
Anything that threatens to affect the UK’s global success as a
top destination for international talent needs to be considered
very carefully.”