Theresa Villiers (Chipping Barnet) (Con) I have secured this debate
today because I really hate litter. It disfigures our parks,
pavements and streets; it damages our beautiful countryside and
harms our environment; it is a disaster for our oceans and
waterways; and it costs hundreds of millions of pounds to clear up.
It seems to get everywhere—it has even, on occasion, been present
in this very Chamber. As I revealed to a shocked audience in a
Westminster Hall debate in...Request free trial
(Chipping Barnet)
(Con)
I have secured this debate today because I really hate litter. It
disfigures our parks, pavements and streets; it damages our
beautiful countryside and harms our environment; it is a disaster
for our oceans and waterways; and it costs hundreds of millions
of pounds to clear up. It seems to get everywhere—it has even, on
occasion, been present in this very Chamber. As I revealed to a
shocked audience in a Westminster Hall debate in 2018, I found a
discarded Crunchie wrapper just feet away from where I stand now,
so it a universal problem that needs tackling.
On a more serious note, one of the most disturbing impacts of
litter is on wildlife. The Royal Society for the Prevention of
Cruelty to Animals receives hundreds of calls every year
reporting the harm done to animals and birds by carelessly
discarded items—suffocated by plastic bags, entangled in plastic
can holders, trapped in cans or injured by sharp edges—and who
could fail to be distressed and moved by the pictures we have
seen on our TV screens of marine life choked on plastic or
drowned by discarded fishing gear?
Government figures from 2018 indicated that every year more than
150 million tonnes of plastic waste enter the world’s oceans and
1 million birds die from eating it or becoming tangled up in it.
There are other figures indicating that the problem may be even
worse. The situation is intolerable and we must take action.
Litter problems intensified during lockdown, when dumping food
and drink packaging in parks seemed to reach epidemic
proportions. I found it depressing to see Oak Hill Park in my
constituency strewn day after day with Costa Coffee cups. During
lockdown walks, I also noticed that the rubbish at the roadside
of the A1 where it passes close to my constituency was
appalling—feet deep in some places. I am sure all Members of this
House are aware of the grave harm caused by fly-tipping, the most
extreme form of littering. It has been a particular problem in St
Albans Road in High Barnet but, regrettably, it occurs on many
streets and in many open spaces in my constituency. This blight
on our communities must be tackled, and I know Ministers are
determined to do so.
Change is on the way. In 2017 the Government published England’s
first ever national litter strategy, setting out how they planned
to deliver the aim of substantially reducing littering within a
generation. The Environment Act 2021, which I was privileged to
present to this House, paves the way for important action on the
matters we are considering in this debate.
First, it will allow digital tracking of waste, providing
important new ways to hold to account those responsible for
disposing of our rubbish. Secondly, it contains new powers to
tackle fly-tipping. In my time as Secretary of State, I was
privileged to help set up in 2020 a joint unit bringing together
law enforcement agencies, environmental regulators, His Majesty’s
Revenue and Customs and the National Crime Agency in the war
against fly-tipping and waste crime. Thirdly, the Act will pave
the way for extended producer responsibility. EPR is a scheme to
ensure that the companies that produce plastic packaging meet the
full cost of disposing of it. The goal is to incentivise a
reduction in the volume of packaging used and ensure that more of
it is recycled. EPR will also create a new income stream to help
local councils deal with the cost of disposing of rubbish and
tackling litter.
The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs estimates
that packaging producers will need to pay around £1.2 billion a
year in EPR charges, which will go to councils. I want the
Minister to assure the House that that important scheme is on
schedule and that it will mean more council staff out clearing up
our streets, funded by the companies whose omnipresent packaging
makes up such a large proportion of irresponsibly discarded
rubbish—especially food outlets. The Government said that they
wanted the scheme to start in October. Will that happen? If not,
when will it be implemented? A commitment to EPR was made back in
2018. Let us get it done.
I make the same simple point about the deposit return scheme for
drinks containers. That is another crucial part of the
Environment Act, and it should significantly reduce the number of
bottles and cans that are thoughtlessly discarded. I acknowledge
that there are complexities here. The mess that the SNP has made
of its DRS in Scotland shows that we need to take care and get
the scheme right on a technical level. In particular, it is
important that we resolve the VAT issue that has arisen, and I
hope that the Minister will confirm how the Finance (No. 2) Bill
proposes to do that. A deposit return scheme would be popular. It
is a manifesto commitment, and many other countries have been
operating such schemes for years. DRS projects have been very
successful around the world in incentivising a responsible
approach to disposing of drinks containers. Let us get this done;
let us make DRS happen.
(Beckenham) (Con)
I thank my right hon. Friend—my very good friend—for allowing me
to intervene. I seem to recall that when I was a child, which was
quite a long time ago now—[Interruption.] You are nodding sagely,
Mr Deputy Speaker. One of the things that we used to get extra
pocket money for was picking up bottles and taking them back to
the store. I seemed to get quite a good income stream from that.
It would be very nice if that sort of scheme were reintroduced.
Does she agree?
I do indeed agree. For many years, that kind of scheme was a
feature of life in Britain, and I know that many would like to
see its return. That is one reason why I have raised it in the
debate.
There are other ways in which Government policy could step up the
campaign against litter. More could be done to enforce the law in
that area. Clearly, financial penalties should be issued only in
appropriate and proportionate circumstances, but they are an
important tool in the box for achieving the goal of litter
reduction. There have been welcome steps forward on enforcement.
Fines have been increased and rules clarified to make it more
straightforward for councils to issue them. The Government have
also changed the law so that if there is evidence of litter being
thrown from a car, the registered keeper of the vehicle can be
liable for a fine. It is no longer necessary to prove that they
were driving the car at the time.
However, there is a strong case for greater use of cameras in
enforcement. There are about 11,000 automatic number plate
recognition cameras around the country to monitor vehicles and
track stolen cars and movements by criminals. Why can we not use
them to catch a few litterbugs as well? Prompted by my
constituent Phil Little, I raised that in a parliamentary
question two years ago. The Minister at the time responded that
ANPR cameras are not suitable for use in that way. I find that
hard to understand. When the use of cameras can be the basis of
fines for so many traffic offences, why not for chucking rubbish
of a car window?
I welcome the news that the Department for Transport will soon
trial the use of CCTV to capture evidence of people littering or
fly-tipping in lay-bys. It is good to know that National Highways
is at last looking at whether automatic number plate recognition
can be used to catch litter offenders. I also welcome last year’s
announcement by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural
Affairs of £450,000 for CCTV, ANPR and rapid deployment cameras
at hotspots to reduce unlawful dumping of rubbish and to provide
evidence to identify the offenders responsible for it. I
genuinely welcome the fact that my plea for the use of
litter-cams two years ago seems to have been heard, but I
emphasise that we need to see tangible progress on the trials and
pilot schemes, especially on our road network.
Roadside litter can cause serious accidents, and collecting it
can be hazardous. As dedicated campaigners such as John Read of
Clean Up Britain point out, there are some truly appalling litter
hotspots on our strategic road network. Cameras are part of Mr
Read’s 10-point plan to tackle the problem, including greater use
of dashcam footage. I too believe that cameras could be a
powerful new weapon in the war against litter. Let us start using
them.
I come now to action against commonly littered items. I am proud
to have been the Secretary of State who extended the plastic bag
charging scheme, which has seen their use drop by over 97% in
major supermarkets and so must have reduced the number of bags
littered, but let us go a step further and ban disposable
barbecues as well. They are a fire hazard and can cause injury.
It is truly appalling that people simply leave them behind after
a day out, and tragic that they are left on some of our most
beautiful beaches and our greatest beauty spots. Even a farm in
my constituency has had to contend with this problem.
Can we have more concerted action on chewing gum? I welcome the
establishment of a chewing gum taskforce, bringing together
producers to invest £10 million over five years in cleaning up
gum staining and encouraging responsible disposal. The reality is
that chucking this stuff away is a truly vile and antisocial
thing to do. It does significant damage, including getting matted
in the fur or feathers of animals and birds. Can we learn from
other countries in taking a really tough approach to the scourge
of littered chewing gum?
What will Ministers do to ensure that tobacco companies take
responsibility for the fact that cigarettes are by far the most
frequently littered item in the country? Even as the number of
smokers continues to fall, any litter-picker will tell us that if
we look at the ground in more or less any public place on this
island, we are likely to spot a cigarette butt somewhere close
by.
Another key means of cleaning up Britain and keeping it free of
rubbish is behaviour change. Over the years, many of my
constituents have told me how important it is to push out
effective communications to convince people of the simple message
that they must take their little home with them and put it in a
bin. I know that Keep Britain Tidy runs some very effective
DEFRA-funded campaigns, such as its “Keep it, Bin it” campaign,
but can we do more? What about a new litter awareness course, as
advocated by Policy Exchange in its “Litterbugs 2.0” paper? The
national speed awareness course is widely recognised to play an
effective role in changing people’s attitude to speeding by
educating them about its consequences. We should consider
adopting the model in this context, too.
Will the Minister tell us what progress has been made on plans to
use so-called geofencing at roadside litter hotspots, to drive
anti-litter messages to the devices of people physically in those
locations? Behaviour change messages aimed at commercial drivers,
including overseas lorry drivers, are also important. The rubbish
that collects around some truck stops shows that driver education
is needed. It is also vital to ensure that loads are secured
properly, so that rubbish does not blow off and become litter. A
constituent of mine, Dench, who came to see me recently
to discuss these issues asked that more research be done into who
is responsible for littering and why they do it. I ask Ministers
what research is being carried out, particularly on how to
persuade children and young people not to drop litter.
One only has to walk past some of the schools in my constituency
to know that the problem of litter is, I am afraid, sometimes
linked to children and young people, although I am sure that the
majority would not indulge in this conduct. I therefore welcome
the eco-schools programme funded by the Government, which
includes litter as well as wider issues around sustainability,
waste and recycling. We all know that in recent years, there has
been a huge wave of concern about the environment among the
younger generation. We must find a way to capitalise on that and
explain that one of the most tangible and instant ways in which
children and young people can safeguard our environment is to
take their litter home and put it in the recycling bin. That is a
message that I try to take to all the schools I visit, especially
when I receive questions and points from students about plastics
pollution in our oceans, as I almost invariably do.
That brings me to the topic of marine litter. As was shown so
clearly by the BBC’s “Blue Planet” and, more recently, “Wild
Isles” series, we have a plastics crisis in our oceans. We must
stop the appalling outflow of plastic and other rubbish into the
sea—we cannot let it continue. I know that the Government are
putting a huge amount of effort into that goal, and the EPR and
DRS schemes I mentioned earlier in my speech should provide
further help once they are operational, but much of this problem
comes from other countries, so only truly global action will fix
it.
I pay tribute to the work that Ministers have done on the
international stage on this issue. The UK can truly be said to be
a global leader in ocean protection, with 38% of UK waters in
marine protected areas. The Government also played a crucial role
in establishing the Commonwealth Clean Ocean Alliance to lead
international efforts to tackle plastics pollution, and helped
secure commitments on protection of the marine environment at
last year’s COP15 conference on biodiversity in Montreal.
Together with our overseas territories and dependencies, we in
this country are responsible for one of the largest marine
estates on the planet, and working with those territories we have
introduced protection zones covering over 4 million sq km. That
is quite an old figure; the current one may be greater. I believe
it is reasonable to say that no other country in the world is
doing more to stop litter polluting the marine environment.
In conclusion, I pay tribute to the street cleansing staff in
Barnet and other areas who are working for councils across the
country on the frontline of the battle against litter. So, too,
is the army of volunteers who turn out to pick litter in their
community. I have had the privilege of joining many such groups
over the years, including—to mention just a few—Green Beings High
Barnet, the Barnet Society, the Dollis Brookers, the Pymmes
BrookERS, and most recently the Barnet residents association. The
Great British spring clean and the Great British beach clean see
those kinds of groups head out all over the country to tidy up
their communities, many of them supported by the high streets
community clean-up fund. I thank all those volunteer groups, and
I thank Keep Britain Tidy, which does so much to make those
litter picks happen.
As I have said many times in this Chamber, all of us who are
privileged to serve here should strive to protect the natural
environment—few tasks should be more important to any Member of
this House—and combating the scourge of litter is an important
part of doing that. It can also play a crucial role in levelling
up our country and restoring pride in our towns and cities.
Litter is an eyesore that blights our communities and damages our
global reputation, so let us do everything we can to prevent it,
so that we can safeguard this beautiful country that all of us
are lucky enough to call home.
Mr Deputy Speaker ( )
I myself have gone out and picked up litter throughout the Ribble
Valley, and I thank the volunteers who I saw a couple of weeks
ago who went out picking litter throughout my constituency. I
want to say that there is a simple solution: do not drop litter.
It is not rocket science.
4.24pm
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Environment, Food
and Rural Affairs ()
I could not agree more with your wise words, Mr Deputy Speaker,
and I join you in thanking the volunteers in your constituency,
as well as those in Chipping Barnet and right across the country.
It feels appropriate to mark that sense of volunteerism that we
excel at in this country. I know that the Big Help Out is a
fundamental part of this coronation weekend, and I will certainly
be involved in judging the best dressed house in my village of
Bootle, perhaps making a number of enemies and fewer friends. The
planting, painting and renovating and the picking up of litter
that we do right across this country are testament to our
fantastic community spirit, and it was a joy to hear about that
today. It is perhaps inspired by the well-spent youth of my right
hon. Friend the Member for Beckenham () and his part in street cleansing, which was lovely
to hear about.
I pay tribute to my right hon. Friend the Member for Chipping
Barnet () not just for securing the
debate, but for the work she has done as a Back Bencher and
perhaps even more importantly when she led the great Department
for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, where she served as
Secretary of State. It was a pleasure to chat to officials today
to learn of their experience of working with her. They reminded
me that she brought the Environment Bill, now the Environment Act
2021, to this House. I had the great pleasure of being able to
publish the environmental improvement plan on 31 January. It is a
spin-off—a kind of five-year review of the Environment Act 2021.
I thank her for all her hard work.
The Minister responsible for this area, the Under-Secretary of
State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, my hon. Friend the
Member for Taunton Deane (), is unfortunately unable to
attend the debate, so I have the pleasure of responding. If I am
unable to answer any of the more technical points in her
portfolio, I will endeavour to ensure that I or she writes with
further details.
Let me state unequivocally that this Government are absolutely
committed to tackling the scourge of litter. My right hon. Friend
the Member for Chipping Barnet referenced the importance that
schools place on that, and the eco-schools programme is a fine
example. Certainly when I visit primary schools and ask them what
they think is the most important thing to help nature’s recovery,
they say, “Stop litter.” They have seen the David Attenborough
documentaries. “Wild Isles” is a fantastic example, and they
absolutely appreciate what plastic pollution does to nature, both
on land and in the sea.
Let me go through some of the actions we are taking on multiple
fronts, as we said we would in our litter strategy. They include
supporting local councils, which are often best placed to tackle
local issues such as littering. For example, we have developed
and shared best practice on the provision of litter bins and
supported that with £1 million in grant funding, which has helped
more than 40 councils purchase new litter bins. Councils are
responsible for taking enforcement action, and in recent years we
have bolstered their powers by introducing penalties for the
keeper of the vehicle, as my right hon. Friend said. It is now
possible that the keeper of the vehicle from which litter is
thrown will suffer a penalty. In doing so, we have made it clear
that councils are free to take action based on camera footage,
including that supplied by members of the public, as long as
councils are satisfied that the evidence meets the relevant
standards, so I think that we have been listening.
I know that the Government take this issue seriously. Can the
Minister confirm that ANPR cameras can be used to capture an
image that can be the basis of a fine for littering?
I would like to write to my right hon. Friend with the absolutely
correct information, but perhaps I can reassure her by the
commitment of £1.2 million that we have provided to more than 30
councils to help them purchase equipment to tackle fly-tipping.
Nearly all the projects are utilising CCTV in some way, including
one focused on identifying offenders using AI technology in
combination with ANPR cameras, which I know— because my right
hon. Friend is absolutely insistent—is a very sensible idea. We
are also starting to see some positive results from these grants.
In Durham, for example, the county council has seen a reduction
in fly-tipping of over 60% in the areas where CCTV was installed
on existing lighting columns. Case studies will be made available
in due course so that others can learn about the interventions
that were most successful.
The Government’s new antisocial behaviour action plan sets out
how we will go further by supporting councils to take even
tougher action against those who seek to degrade our public
spaces. This includes significantly raising the upper limit on
fixed penalty notices to £1,000 for fly-tipping and £500 for
littering and graffiti. Alongside these increases, there are new
measures to help councils and others to carry out more
enforcement activity. This includes funding to support police and
crime commissioners, working with councils and others, to target
enforcement in the areas where antisocial behaviour is most
prevalent. Initially, the Government will support 10 trailblazer
areas, scaling up to hotspot enforcement action across all police
forces in England and Wales in 2024. Under the action plan, a new
approach called immediate justice will be introduced to make
perpetrators repair the damage they have done. They will be
forced to pick up the litter, clear wastelands or clean up
graffiti within as little as 48 hours of being caught. This will
start in 10 places before being expanded across England and Wales
in 2024.
Furthermore, DEFRA is working in partnership with Keep Britain
Tidy. I pay tribute to it, because the Keep Britain Tidy campaign
is incredibly well known and very successful across the country.
I also pay tribute to the chewing gum producers for establishing
the chewing gum taskforce. In 2022, the taskforce provided
funding of £1.2 million to help more than 40 councils clean gum
off pavements and invest in long-term behavioural change to
prevent gum from being dropped in the first place. The first year
of grants saw some fantastic results, with behavioural change
projects reducing gum litter by over 35% on average. The
taskforce is running a similar scheme in 2023 and, in total, gum
producers will be investing up to £10 million over five years in
the taskforce.
I know my right hon. Friend wants to see roadside litter tackled
robustly. It is absolutely infuriating to see bags of fast food
packaging, sometimes bagged up into a carrier bag, tossed out of
a vehicle, and I find them on country walks. I just wonder what
goes through people’s minds when they behave like that in our
countryside. I absolutely share my right hon. Friend’s despair at
those kinds of acts, which are blighting our countryside. So I am
very pleased to be working with National Highways, which is
working with Keep Britain Tidy, to fully understand who litters
and why littering occurs from vehicles. Using the insight from
the research, National Highways will be carrying out targeted
behavioural change interventions. It is also collecting evidence
of littering across the network and working with litter
authorities to encourage prosecution.
While local councils have the responsibility for keeping our
public spaces clear of litter, the role of volunteer litter
picking groups should not be underestimated. As I have said, and
I think Members across this House will have great examples in
their constituencies, they are certainly held in very high esteem
by this Government. We have also supported volunteers in other
ways. In 2019, the Government provided £9.75 million for our high
streets community clean-up fund. Councils were able to use that
one-off funding to support volunteers, for example by supplying
litter pickers. I am pleased that Barnet Council, which sits in
my right hon. Friend’s Chipping Barnet constituency, was one
recipient of that fund.
I have used the bags myself.
My right hon. Friend uses the bags herself, and I am delighted
that she is a cheery recipient of that fund. More recently, the
Environment Agency published a regulatory position statement,
which allows local tips to accept litter from voluntary litter
pickers, and enables volunteers to collect litter without needing
a waste carriers licence. We will continue to use our influence
to support and endorse national clean-up initiatives such as Keep
Britain Tidy’s Great British Spring Clean, and encourage as many
as are willing to participate in such events in the future. Our
commitments extend to reforming how packaging waste is managed,
which should help to prevent litter at source.
My right hon. Friend asked for an update on our extended producer
responsibility for packaging scheme. That will move the cost of
managing packaging disposed of in street bins away from local
taxpayers and councils, and on to the producers of that
packaging, hopefully reducing it. In January, we set out policy
decisions and next steps for introducing a deposit return scheme
for drink containers. The implementation of that scheme is
expected substantially to reduce the littering of in-scope drink
containers by up to 90% in year three of the scheme. We remain
committed to our delivery timetable, and will continue to manage
any associated risks in a way that supports the goals of the
extended producer responsibility for packaging and deposit return
schemes.
This is about encouraging people to do the right thing. In 2018,
the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs launched
the “Keep it, Bin it” anti-litter campaign with Keep Britain
Tidy. The campaign encourages people, including young people, to
dispose of their litter responsibly. We use social media to raise
awareness of the impact of litter, and to encourage individuals
to put their rubbish in the bin or take it home. Projects funded
as part of our fly-tipping grant scheme for councils include the
integration of CCTV and a digital fly-tipping awareness course
for those caught fly-tipping in Durham. Once again, we have been
listening to my right hon. Friend, and many of her suggestions,
and the actions she undertook while in the Department, have
proven positive and effective.
Since the introduction of our carrier bag charge, the number of
single-use plastic bags sold by the main retailers reduced by
over 97% between 2014 and 2022. That has translated to less
litter. According to the Marine Conservation Society, there has
been a 55% drop in plastic bags found on UK beaches since the
charge was introduced, so it has been highly effective.
I thank my good friend the Minister for allowing me to intervene.
One thing we have not mentioned is invisible litter such as
microplastics in the ocean. Marine life consume microplastics,
which, through consumption, we then consume. Microplastics kill
marine life, and they may well also kill human beings. The issue
is growing and growing.
We have also taken action on microbeads, plastic straws, ear buds
and plastic stirrers. We will soon ban the supply of single-use
plastic plates, bowls, trays, cutlery, balloon sticks, and
certain polystyrene food and beverage containers from October
2023. We will also ban nitrous oxide, known as laughing gas, to
put an end to intimidating groups littering local parks with
empty cannisters.
My right hon. Friend the Member for Chipping Barnet raised the
issue of disposable barbeques, which when used appropriately
present little or no risk of harm to people, nature and the
environment. They are enjoyed responsibly by many people across
the nation, both at home and outdoors, and it is right that we do
not unduly prevent that responsible enjoyment. However, when
disposable barbeques are used irresponsibly, they can present a
danger. That is why we commissioned research to understand the
impact of their misuse to inform future policy in the area. Local
authorities can already restrict and prevent misuse where
appropriate using their existing powers. We have also explored
options for tackling the littering of cigarette butts, including
making the industry financially responsible for the costs of
dealing with littered butts, and we are currently considering the
next steps.
We are also aware of the growing use of disposable vaping
products. Producers of electricals, including vapes, are
currently obligated to finance the collection and treatment of
those products when they become waste. We will continue to
strengthen the existing obligations and consult on policies aimed
at driving up levels of separate collection of electrical and
electronic waste, including vaping devices, later this year.
I hope that I have demonstrated how deeply determined the
Government and my Department are to tackle litter and our
commitment to creating a clean and tidy public place for all to
enjoy. Let me end by joining you, Mr Deputy Speaker, in your
words wishing everybody here, near and far a fabulous coronation
weekend. I thank my right hon. Friend for an excellent and timely
debate about how we really do keep Britain tidy.
Question put and agreed to.
|