-
The REA responds to today’s Spring Statement saying
that despite a few welcome measures, the “clean energy reset”
offered little for renewable energy and clean
technology;
-
Extended support for consumers welcome, but further
measures are required to address the underlying energy crisis
in the long-term;
-
Overall, it marks a missed opportunity for the UK, as
the US and EU push forward in attracting low carbon
investment.
The REA (Association for Renewable Energy and Clean Technology)
has responded to Chancellor Jeremy Hunt’s Spring “budget for
growth”, saying that the statement marks a missed opportunity to
unlock green growth in the UK, as we see an increasingly
competitive international investment environment.
We welcome government’s commitment to advancing carbon capture
and storage - this is a long awaited and welcome step forward.
The REA notes that it is now particularly essential that today’s
announcements deliver a route to market for bioenergy with carbon
capture and storage (BECCS) at a range of scales.
The REA also welcome moves to change pension investment rules to
allow and enable pension fund investment in renewables and clean
technology, something the REA has advocated for.
However, we had called for reforms to the Electricity Generator
Levy (EGL) which would incentivise vital investment in renewable
and clean technologies and will importantly mirror the investment
incentive provided to the oil and gas sector within the Energy
Profits Levy. Furthermore, the REA questions why the measure to
extend existing fuel duty freeze is not matched with reducing the
cost of running Electric Vehicles (EVs) through reducing the rate
of VAT at public chargepoints in line with domestic charging
rates.
Without these actions, government risks losing out on the
opportunity to address barriers blocking deployment of renewable
and low carbon infrastructure, to deliver a secure, affordable
and decarbonised power system.
Further welcome measures include the extension of the Climate
Change Agreement scheme for a further two years to encourage
energy efficiency, along with the extension to the Energy Price
Guarantee that is much needed to protect households from the
devastating impacts of the ongoing energy crisis.
The REA highlights that this urgent intervention must be
accompanied by robust support for renewables to tackle the
fundamental problem of the volatile price of fossil fuels in the
long term, so that consumers will continue to be protected going
forward. A renewable energy and clean technology transition, not
more of the same, is the route out of this crisis.
Frank Gordon, Director of Policy at the
REA (Association for Renewable Energy and Clean Technology)
said:
“Government’s commitment to advancing carbon capture and
storage is a long awaited and welcome step forward, helping to
reaffirm the UK’s global position as leaders in this innovative
technology, and see it built at commercial scale. However,
government must now set out how further bioenergy with carbon
capture and storage (BECCS) projects will be taken forward across
all scales. There are over 60 Biomass power sites in the UK,
representing over 4500 MW of capacity, all of whom could be
looking to CCS to deliver carbon removals.
“The industry and investors are ready; they now need Government
to confirm details on a reasonable route to market in order to
push ahead.
“While we welcome this support and acknowledge the tough economic
backdrop, it was disappointing that the Budget offered no new
support for moving to long-term solutions to tackle the energy
crisis such as decarbonising heat, energy efficiency, securing
investment in Net Zero supply chains in response to US and EU
support, no compensatory measures for EV drivers from the fuel
duty freeze and nothing on moving to a more Circular
Economy.
“Much attention will turn to the Autumn Statement where there was
a commitment to respond to the supply chain investment
requirements in response to the likes of the US Inflation
Reduction Act.
“Overall, today’s statement marks a missed opportunity as the US
and EU push forward in attracting low carbon investment, while
the UK risks falling behind.”