Integrated Review fails to secure Britain’s national defence for the future, says Labour
|
Analysis by Labour confirms that the Conservatives have failed to
secure Britain’s national defence for the future as threats
increase. While this announcement focuses on the future of the UK’s
nuclear programme and replenishing stockpiles for Ukraine,
Ministers have failed to address growing questions about critical
capabilities which weaken our security and undermine the UK’s NATO
obligations. These include: Shrinking Army: The government
is...Request free trial
Analysis by Labour confirms that the Conservatives have failed to secure Britain’s national defence for the future as threats increase. While this announcement focuses on the future of the UK’s nuclear programme and replenishing stockpiles for Ukraine, Ministers have failed to address growing questions about critical capabilities which weaken our security and undermine the UK’s NATO obligations. These include:
The Defence Secretary himself said that the Conservatives have “hollowed out and underfunded” our Armed Forces and the NAO recently concluded that the Government “cannot afford” its current defence plans. When Labour left government in 2010 the UK was spending 2.5% of GDP on defence, a level that’s not been matched in any one of the 13 Tory years since. Since 2010, the Conservatives have wasted at least £15bn of taxpayers’ money through MoD mismanagement of defence procurement, with £5bn wasted since 2019 alone while the current Defence Secretary has been in post. Shadow Defence Secretary John Healey said: “The first duty of any government is to defend the country and keep its citizens safe. But the Conservatives have failed to secure Britain’s national defence for the future. “The Integrated Review and Budget will not address concerns over critical capabilities which weaken our national defence and undermine the UK’s NATO obligations. “Labour’s commitment to NATO is unshakeable. We will publish a defence and security review in our first year of government to make sure capabilities match the threats we face.” Ends Notes No new money for day-to-day spending on the Armed Forces
UK defence expenditure that meets the NATO definition
Source: NATO, Defence Expenditures of NATO Countries (2014-2022), June 2022 MOD, International defence expenditure: 2021 Shrinking the Army
Tanks
Ajax
https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5803/cmselect/cmpubacc/259/report.html https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2022-11-29/98703 Artillery
AS-90 donation: https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2023-01-16/debates/41FD78FF-E28C-4887-B1D0-0F53E5F705C1/UkraineUpdate Total number of AS-90s/MLRS: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1121675/UK_Armed_Forces_Equipment_and_Formations_2022_tables.xlsx (table 5) NAO Report: https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/NAO-Report-The-equipment-plan-2022-to-2032.pdf (p.20) Fantasy Frigates
Surveillance planes
“Hollowed out and underfunded”
The government cannot afford its current defence plans
https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/NAO-Report-The-equipment-plan-2022-to-2032.pdf ,p. 8 Labour’s dossier of waste in the Ministry of Defence: |
