Mark Fletcher (Bolsover) (Con) I beg to move, That this House has
considered the potential merits of improvements to junction 28 of
the M1. It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Ms
McVey, and I hope that today’s discussion is suitably blue-collar
for you. I am absolutely delighted to be joined by my neighbours,
my hon. Friends the Members for Ashfield (Lee Anderson) and for
Amber Valley (Nigel Mills). I send the apologies of my hon. Friend
the...Request free trial
(Bolsover) (Con)
I beg to move,
That this House has considered the potential merits of
improvements to junction 28 of the M1.
It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Ms McVey, and
I hope that today’s discussion is suitably blue-collar for
you.
I am absolutely delighted to be joined by my neighbours, my hon.
Friends the Members for Ashfield () and for Amber Valley (). I send the apologies of my
hon. Friend the Member for Mansfield (), who is unfortunately unable
to be in Westminster Hall today. However, I know that he is
incredibly supportive of the discussions that we are about to
have and the case that we are about to make.
I am particularly delighted to see that the Under-Secretary of
State for Transport, my hon. Friend the Member for North West
Durham (Mr Holden), is responding to the debate and I will
pre-emptively butter him up. I know that he very much shares my
passion for investing in roads and infrastructure, and for
levelling up. He also understands the importance of the Bolsover
constituency to this country; I look forward to his just signing
off on this project on an ad hoc basis.
I was elected on a manifesto that was about levelling up places
such as Bolsover. The former mining communities that I represent
are a hidden gem in the heart of England. We are blessed with
great people and great potential, but there is a need to unlock
some of that great potential. We have low unemployment locally,
but average wages are low and many jobs are low-skilled. I want
to deliver high-skilled, high-wage jobs and allow every young
person in my constituency to fulfil their potential. The
essential ingredients for levelling up are good infrastructure
and transport links, which I will return to, good housing stock,
a skilled and educated population, and skilled jobs and
investment—all underpinned by a culture of aspiration. The
Bolsover constituency is fortunate to sit close to Sheffield,
Derby and Nottingham—all cities undergoing a renaissance, with
the East Midlands airport and a soon-to-arrive freeport attached,
and major companies such as Rolls-Royce powering the regional
economy—but that means nothing if residents and businesses cannot
get to and from those places due to inadequate transport
links.
I am here to make the case primarily on behalf of the residents
of South Normanton and Pinxton for the long-overdue upgrade of
junction 28 of the M1. I say “primarily”, because a wide-ranging
list of stakeholders supports the upgrade of the junction,
including, but not limited to, the Conservative county council
leader, the Co-operative Group, National Highways, the Labour
district council leader, local district councillors, local parish
councillors, Councillor Siddle, the county councillor for
South Normanton and Pinxton, Midlands Connect, a McDonald’s
franchise and dozens of other businesses, not to mention the
thousands of people inconvenienced by the junction every day, not
all of whom live in the Bolsover constituency.
Junction 28 of the M1 was built in 1967 as the key strategic node
linking the M1 and the A38, connecting north and south, the east
and west midlands, and facilitating the movement of goods and
services between local, regional and nationwide locations.
Locally, it links South Normanton and Pinxton to the motorway
network and the A38, which, heading eastwards, goes past various
major distribution and business parks as well as the McArthurGlen
shopping centre outlet, before leaving the safe confines of
Derbyshire, a mile or so down the road, and entering
Nottinghamshire, first into Ashfield and then into Mansfield.
Heading westwards along the A38, a person will soon reach Ripley,
then Derby and then the west midlands and Staffordshire,
beginning with Burton upon Trent.
This junction of major strategic importance acts as the gateway
to the south of my constituency, including communities such as
Tibshelf, Newton, Blackwell, Pilsley and Morton. It also acts as
a major logistics and employment hub for the whole region, yet it
is simply not fit for purpose and is over capacity. When it comes
to safety, delays, air pollution or reliability, junction 28’s
design is causing problems. It is an all-too-familiar sight,
particularly for those of us travelling south from places such as
Clowne, where I live, to see the signs approaching junction 2
state: “Queues on sliproad”. It is not infrequent that the queues
stretch back to Tibshelf services, three miles back from the
junction.
As one constituent wrote to me,
“I’ve had several incidents on my way to work, where I was forced
to join the back of queuing traffic that extended from the
junction slip road on to the slow lane of the M1 motorway. Many
cars were using the hard shoulder to queue, to avoid being
stationary on the M1 itself. It was evident to me that the
stationary vehicles were being passed by cars and lorries
travelling at high speed. The risk of injuries or death from a
multi-vehicle collision is very high.”
That sense of danger when using the junction is almost
ever-present. Twenty-nine per cent. of local residents said their
experience of the junction was very unsafe, and 41% said it was
unsafe. Tellingly, only 1% said it was very safe.
The situation is no better from the northbound carriageway.
Queues often trail back on to main carriageway. One resident,
Emma, from South Normanton, who uses the junction every day,
wrote in her survey response:
“the daily situation of queuing on the M1 northbound to get on to
the slip road is very dangerous and has been shown as such with
the recent serious accidents.”
Residents often tell me that they avoid the roundabout as it is
unsafe, with one even describing it as “treacherous”. This sense
of fear plays out in the data. There have been 16 serious
accidents—the highest category—in the past 10 years. Many other
minor scrapes and near misses are not recorded, but anyone who
has used the junction, particularly heading into South Normanton
on Mansfield Road, will know how dangerous it can feel.
Councillor Siddle, who shares my passion for
upgrading the junction, sent me a note ahead of the debate,
highlighting how the problems have been aggravated in recent
years. A lot of new housing has been built locally and a number
of new businesses have understandably invested in the area, such
as the Panattoni park complex. It joins others like Alloga and
the McArthurGlen shopping outlet, which have expanded locally.
That is not to mention that attractions like the Peak District
have grown in popularity, all increasing usage of the junction
and the surrounding areas. Some parts of the network have been
improved to cope with these pressures, such as the A38 around
Derby and the move to make the M1 four lanes—albeit under a smart
motorway scheme that I think local residents would prefer to do
without—but this junction connecting those critical roads remains
outdated.
The stationary traffic has a huge impact on local air quality.
South Normanton has been an air quality management area since
2001. That was fortunately removed in March last year because of
improvements to vehicle emissions, but as a letter from South
Normanton parish council said last year,
“the queuing caused by this junction is nothing short of an
environmental disaster for the local people”
—a sentiment I hear regularly across South Normanton and Pinxton.
The same letter points out that the knock-on effects of the
queuing mean that drivers take alternative routes that can become
rat runs, which are often close to the local schools. I hasten to
add that Pinxton also suffers tremendously from the number of
heavy goods vehicles that travel through it, causing air and
noise pollution—though that is a slightly separate argument from
the one I am making today.
This issue becomes more acute for residents when there are
problems or works on the network. Any issue south of junction 28
sees a diversion towards Derby on the A38. Maintenance work or
accidents on the A38 see traffic diverted through South
Normanton. More than once I have seen the entire region become
one long traffic jam. Alongside these dangers and inconveniences
for local residents, an economic cost is involved. There are
delays to the traffic heading north and south on Britain’s main
motorway and east and west on the main arterial route that
connects the east and west midlands, not to mention the impact
that the congestion has on the wider region around Bolsover,
Chesterfield, Ashfield and Mansfield.
I am extremely grateful to the team at Midlands Connect, who work
across the midlands on behalf of the Government to recommend the
most important transport investments to the Secretary of State.
Midlands Connect has recognised that improving junction 28 is a
priority and has been working proactively with me on putting the
case forward for the necessary investment. It has produced the
following data, which helps underline the strong case for
investment. Analysis by Midlands Connect shows that delays at
junction 28 of the M1 lead to over 1,100 hours of delays every
day at peak times. Simply, in monetary terms, that costs the
local and national economy over £4.5 million a year. Thousands of
pounds every day are being lost from unnecessary delays, and many
stakeholders have identified issues with that junction as a
barrier to investing in our constituencies. In an independent
survey, over half of the residents of South Normanton and Pinxton
thought that improvements to the junction would be “very
important” to businesses.
The Co-operative Group has a major depot just off the junction.
In a letter to me in April last year, it said it makes around
135,000 vehicle movements through junction 28 in a year. It
estimates that the average four-minute waiting time per vehicle
amounts to 9,000 lost hours, or 900 driver shifts, that could be
saved by making improvements. Strata Products, which has a
factory in Pinxton and a warehouse just off junction 29 in
Holmewood, in my constituency, runs an average of 12 return trips
between the two every day. It believes that the delays at
junction 28 add five minutes per trip, costing the company two
hours of productivity every day. Those are just two examples, but
there are hundreds of businesses located in the area, and the
delays are costing our economy so much money.
As an aside—I appreciate that this is slightly wide of the
debate’s scope—junction 29, in my constituency, is another
junction in desperate need of improvement; the residents of
Holmewood, Heath, Bramley Vale, Doe Lea and Glapwell, and
particularly Councillor Suzy Cornwell, would not forgive me if I
did not mention that. The case for improvements is not the issue
with the junction; rather, it suffers from two complications: the
walkways that run underneath the junction, which affect the
design, and the land that surrounds the junction, which is
currently tied up, somewhat ridiculously, by High Speed 2
safeguarding on a line that we all know is dead.
I hope that the Minister will be in post for a very long time so
that he will be present at a future debate on junction 29, in
which I can make similarly thrilling arguments to him. However,
both National Highways and Derbyshire County Council are aware of
the overwhelming case to improve the junction, and I will
continue to work with both of them in the meantime.
I return to the delays at junction 28, which are costing the
economy £4.5 million a year and deterring investment locally.
Vitally, that is happening in the context of economic research
showing that the gross value added per head and job density in
the districts nearest to junction 28, which are represented in
the Chamber today, are lower than the east midlands average and
significantly below the UK average. Indeed, Bolsover is the most
deprived district in Derbyshire. I know that the Minister shares
my passion for levelling up, and improvements to junction 28
clearly fall into that category. Indeed, in an independent
survey, 80% of local residents said that they saw improvements to
the junction as levelling up in action.
The Department for Transport will soon receive a whole range of
bids for projects to be part of RIS3, or tranche 3 of the road
improvement scheme. It will not surprise the Minister that I
think junction 28 should be top of the pile, and if he feels
inclined to skip the process and approve it today, I will be very
happy to accept that.
In 2021, initial projections by National Highways, which was then
known as Highways England, showed that £21 million of investment
in junction 28 could deliver benefits of around £150 million,
although those figures are now two years out of date and the
former probably needs updating to closer to £30 million due to
inflation. Based on the economic delay figures outlined today, we
would be looking at a return of investment in around five to six
years. The project has a very solid benefit-to-cost ratio, and it
clearly makes commercial sense to improve the junction.
As an aside, it is slightly ludicrous that we rely so heavily on
central Government for regional transport issues, and on funding
over such long timeframes. My constituents would like to see
junction 28 improved today, but unfortunately we will be involved
in a process that takes a number of years. I am just one of many
MPs in the east midlands who support a devolution settlement for
our region, which would unlock a lot of additional funding for
the region and help to provide a more convenient approach to
investment and infrastructure through a regional mayor.
Perhaps central Government should be involved in a project such
as junction 28, where we are talking about investment of £20
million to £30 million, although that seems too low a threshold.
However, on the other side of Whitwell, in my constituency, sits
Darfoulds bridge, where the road simply needs lowering to prevent
HGVs from taking detours through small villages. The project will
cost around £2 million—too much for our local authorities, but
too little for central Government—yet the benefits would be
extraordinary for businesses and residents. I hope the creation
of a regional mayor will help to unlock the stalemate.
Since being elected, I have worked solidly on improving junction
28. I have met National Highways several times, I meet our local
authorities regularly, I have bothered Ministers until I am blue
in the face, and I have spoken continuously to Midlands Connect.
I have surveyed local residents, held a business roundtable,
collated business testimony and brought together the case that I
have presented today.
There is a real case for the Minister to consider. This is an
affordable scheme, it is popular—84% of local residents support
it—it has a strong business case, it will help investment and
save us from losing £4.5 million per year, it is supported by
many local MPs, councillors and business groups, and it will help
the environment. Barry Lewis, the leader of Derbyshire County
Council, says:
“We wholeheartedly support the bid for Government funding to keep
this part of Derbyshire moving by easing congestion to improve
journey times for businesses, commuters, residents and visitors
alike and cut carbon emissions generated by vehicles caught up in
lengthy queues.”
This is the sort of levelling up the Minister could and should be
delivering. On behalf of the residents of Pinxton and South
Normanton, I say: let us get this done.
Several hon. Members rose—
(in the Chair)
Order. We look forward to future debates on other junctions on
the M1, but the question today is that this House has considered
the potential merits of improvements to junction 28 of the M1. We
will go to the Front-Bench speakers at 5.25 pm, with the
winding-up speech at 5.40 pm. For now, I call .
5.01pm
(Amber Valley) (Con)
Thank you, Ms McVey, for calling me. We have plenty of time to
make our case. I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for
Bolsover () on securing the debate and
making so comprehensive a case that there is not much left for
the rest of us to say, so we could get an early finish. But hey,
we are parliamentarians—we should use the time we are given.
The junction is not in my constituency—it is 2 to 3 miles from
the border—but, conveniently, I can look at the live traffic on
Google Maps, and at 5 o’clock on a Wednesday afternoon the delays
have made it back to my constituency. That highlights the
seriousness of my hon. Friend’s case. This is not an occasional
problem; it is a daily problem. At peak times, the congestion
backs up several miles in every direction from the junction.
Something really does need to be done.
Every day, the congestion gets back to part of the A38 at
Alfreton and Swanwick where there are houses literally as far
from the M1 as I am standing from the Minister. Those people are
blighted during the day and night by noise, and at busy times by
fumes. At the very least, we could find a way of taking the
congestion away so that they are not in that horrible
situation.
The Minister probably does not know the junction—although perhaps
he has driven along the M1—but it is actually a very large area,
so there is plenty of scope for improvements. The reason such
significant improvements are needed is that every time there is a
new housing development anywhere remotely near the A38, the
developer’s prospectus says, “Easy access to the A38. Great
connectivity to Nottingham, Derby, Sheffield, the M1.” What it
does not say, of course, is that at peak times that connectivity
is not quite so great, because vehicles will get stuck in a queue
for quite a while.
Access to the road infrastructure—the A38 south, the M1 north,
and the A38 going across the M1—is key to the attractiveness of
investment in new housing and industrial development. If we
cannot improve the situation so that people do not suffer all
these delays, that will hold back the local economy. I agree with
my hon. Friend the Member for Bolsover that there is a compelling
economic case for improvements to the junction. If we want to
drive the growth of the region, we need to sort out the
congestion on the junction. It is not just about convenience and
quality of life; it is about economic growth too.
My hon. Friend tried your patience, Ms McVey, by talking about
other M1 junctions. The only other M1 junction I get near is
junction 26, when I have to go the other way, past the
constituency of my hon. Friend the Member for Ashfield (). We have long campaigned for
a link road to connect the A38 to that junction, which we have
never had. In the absence of such a road, all the traffic that
wants to get on to the M1 has to go up the A38 north. If they are
not doing that, they are going down the A38 south to get to Derby
and Birmingham.
If we do not get connectivity right, we push people into
bottlenecks. If there are ever any problems on the M1 south of
junction 28, or even on the M42, a lot of traffic will try to nip
down the A38 to get on the road to Birmingham, which makes the
daily problem even worse. People try to find alternative routes
around a horribly congested road network as they go through the
east midlands.
I agree that the case for improvements is compelling and really
important to provide connectivity to residents of not just
Bolsover but Amber Valley and other areas around it. We are not
that greedy about the scheme that we would like. I would love to
stand here and ask for a flyover on the A38 so that people can
just keep driving and not stop at the M1 junction unless they
actually want to go on to the M1, but I suspect that would be
quite expensive—perhaps there is a business case for it.
We have rightly found a business case in Derby for an underpass
and an overpass at the island to the south of my constituency.
The problem with those schemes is that they will speed up traffic
through Derby on the A38 north that will then just hit this
queue. All that traffic will do, if we do not fix junction 28, is
get to the end of the queue a bit faster and make it a bit
longer. Sorting the junction out will improve the case for the
schemes that the Government already have in progress.
As I said earlier, junction 28 is a very large junction, and the
traffic island in the middle of it is huge; I think it is the
place where loads that need an assistance vehicle to take them
further north must wait. They park in the middle of this huge
traffic island because there is nowhere in South Yorkshire for
them to wait for the police escort handover—they are all done
there. There is plenty of space to put more lanes on the island,
or to reconfigure the lanes to try to avoid queues conflicting
with each other and causing unnecessary tailbacks.
I have not seen any designs, and I do not know whether there are
any in place, but there is scope to make some pretty significant
improvements without spending a fortune on major re-engineering.
We could just add a couple of extra lanes in the right place on
the island and on the access roads to get traffic moving more
freely and not conflicting. That would not cost tens of millions
of pounds, but it would give much of the benefit that we need,
and I suspect it could be done relatively quickly. We would not
be waiting years, as we have in Derby, for complicated schemes to
get planning permission and funding and have their logistics
sorted out.
My case in support of my hon. Friend the Member for Bolsover is
that there is a very real need here. This problem is happening on
a very regular basis and causing significant tailbacks that
impact the lives of people who live near the A38 and those who
try to use it. It is constraining development of both housing and
industrial economic growth in the area. There are solutions that
are pretty easy to conceive and not that expensive, so I say
wholeheartedly that the scheme should be brought forward as soon
as possible. It will clearly meet all the various cost-benefit
tests that are normally set for this sort of infrastructure
improvement.
5.07pm
(Ashfield) (Con)
It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Ms McVey. I
thank my hon. Friend the Member for Bolsover () for securing this important
debate, and I also thank my hon. Friend the Member for Amber
Valley () for speaking passionately for
the past 10 minutes or so.
I have lived near the junction for all my life. It is about 200
metres from the village of Huthwaite, where I have spent most of
my life. I have been impressed with the Minister so far during
his brief tenure, and I think he is the man to move this forward.
He is the sort of man who has the chequebook ready to sign this
off—there is no pressure there. If we as a Government are serious
about levelling up in places such as Ashfield, Bolsover and Amber
Valley, we must start getting our infrastructure and transport
systems right.
My hon. Friend the Member for Bolsover is quite right that this
was built in 1967. I think my dad worked on the M1 in the ’60s;
that is how old it is. It was fit for purpose then, because there
was hardly any traffic. The M1 is the second-longest motorway in
the country and the A38 is one of the longest roads in the
country, and they meet at junction 28. The amount of traffic that
comes through there is quite incredible. We live within 20
minutes of Derby, Sheffield and Nottingham—and Leicester is
probably 35 minutes away—so it really is a gateway to the whole
of the east midlands, South Yorkshire and Derbyshire. The amount
of traffic that comes through that junction is absolutely
phenomenal. I travel through there in the morning, and every time
I get there I think, “My goodness, why did I come this way,”
because the traffic goes straight back.
Our area is quite successful at the moment, with the levelling up
that we have secured with the towns fund and the future high
streets fund. Ashfield is a bit of a go-to place. Businesses are
looking to set up. There are all the old colliery sites. We have
got businesses like Amazon, which have set up and provided nearly
2,000 jobs. We have got the Co-op in Bolsover, on junction 28,
which is a massive transport depot. Logistics is massive in our
area; we are like a warehouse for the country—particularly places
such as Nottinghamshire, Derbyshire and South Yorkshire. All
those companies are setting up, but we have substandard roads and
a substandard motorway junction.
If we look at all the old colliery sites—the pit sites—in
Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire, I guarantee that 90% of them are
now industrial parks. Many years ago when the pits were open they
had the railway line. They were quite smart then; they had a
railway line that would bring materials in, and then they had a
railway line that would take the coal out to the power stations.
But what did successive Governments do? We shut the pits, we
ripped out all the railway lines and then—hey presto!—30 or 40
years later we start putting factories in these places but there
are no railway lines, so we have to use the roads. It is absolute
madness. We should all hold our hands up and say that is wrong
and we should have learned our lesson.
We are living in 2023, and we have colliery sites that employ
thousands of people across Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire, but
the only way we can get materials in and out is through the
roads. The majority of that in my area comes through junction 28,
and the road is not fit for purpose.
I will make another plea to the Minister—I am going to hijack the
debate a little. With villages such as Huthwaite, Pinxton,
Tibshelf and South Normanton, as well as the little villages
around Ashfield, Amber Valley and Bolsover, I strongly believe
that the amount of traffic that goes through them is damaging our
roads. It is playing havoc. It is noticeable that the closer we
get to the motorway on any junction, the roads get worse. Next to
a motorway the roads are shocking, because there are thousands of
lorries and buses coming off every day, bringing minerals and
materials to those industrial places. When we move out to the
shires, the roads get better and better.
I suggest that the Minister takes that thought away when he is
working out his funding formulas for road repairs. He should bear
in mind that when we live next to places like junction 28 our
roads are absolutely shocking, as are the roads leading into the
motorway, such as the A38, which runs past the top of
Huthwaite—the top of Common Road. There are craters in that road.
Someone only has to sit there for a couple of hours to see how
many lorries come by on that road every single day. It is
absolutely phenomenal, yet the north of the county is not getting
that sort of traffic. I put that plea to the Minister.
The Minister knows that I am going to talk about cycle lanes and
hijack the debate a little more. I drive up to the motorway—up to
junction 28—and I see cycle lanes being installed when we should
be spending that money on the junction and proper road repairs
and resurfacing. I hope that gives the Minister food for
thought.
In Ashfield, which I represent, we have had over £100 million of
investment from this Government, which I am incredibly proud of.
That is through the towns fund and the future high streets fund.
We have two new schools being built. We have had money spent on
the hospital. We are doing really well under a Conservative
Government; we are getting lots of money.
I share that junction with my hon. Friend the Member for
Bolsover, and as many of my constituents use that junction as do
people from Bolsover or Amber Valley—if not more. I pay special
attention to it. I have lived there all my life; I have seen the
changes, the extra traffic and the extra investment that has come
into the area. People want to come to our area, because, as my
hon. Friend the Member for Bolsover said, we are close to three
cities, there is an airport and there are good rail links close
by. If we want to attract more investment and get more businesses
coming in and spending more money—and if we are serious about
levelling up in places like Ashfield, Amber Valley and
Bolsover—we need to sort out our transport. Transport is the most
important thing—it is key to everything.
5.14pm
(Sheffield, Brightside and
Hillsborough) (Lab)
It is a pleasure to serve under your chairpersonship again, Ms
McVey. I congratulate the hon. Member for Bolsover () on securing this important
debate, and on his tireless campaigning on this important issue
for his constituents. I have much sympathy with him and with the
comments he made, particularly about the 1,100 hours of delays,
which are obviously going to impact the productivity of that area
and the economic levelling up promised in the manifesto on which
he was elected. I also thank the two other hon. Members who have
made contributions today—it has been a very lively debate.
Motorways are vital to the British economy. Despite accounting
for only 2% of our road network in England, they carry
approximately one third of all traffic each year: they are
essential in connecting people to jobs, and businesses to goods.
The hon. Member for Bolsover eloquently told us about the
barriers to growing productivity, the issues with air quality,
and particularly the high cost of providing those improvements—I
think he estimated it would cost £30 million in today’s figures,
which is not small change by any means.
Years of short-sighted cuts to our transport budget by successive
Conservative Governments have left many of our roads unfit and
underfunded. Expenditure on local roads by council authorities
has fallen in real terms by approximately 30% since 2010, yet
those authorities are responsible for managing 98% of all roads
in the country. That fall in expenditure has led to a huge
backlog of repairs, estimated to have cost over £12 billion to
clear. The number of bridges on our roads classified as
substandard has risen by 5% since 2020 alone. There is an
estimated cost of £1.6 billion to repair all those substandard
bridges, but due to cut after cut to our local authorities, only
a fraction of those bridges will get the necessary work carried
out within the next five years. As the Government continue to
slash budgets as we enter the coldest and wettest months of the
year, conditions on our roads will only get worse.
The Department for Transport’s own figures show that a third of
all local B and C roads in England need repair. Research by the
Asphalt Industry Alliance found that preventive maintenance is at
least 20 times less expensive than reactive maintenance. It is
both economically and socially responsible to ensure that our
transport network is in the best condition possible, yet
motorists up and down the country are faced with poorly managed
and decaying roads every day. Nine in 10 road users have
experienced issues with at least one pothole in the past year,
and one in three reported that they had changed their daily
routine to avoid them. While the pothole problem gets worse and
worse, the Government have been asleep at the wheel, with 75% of
motorists surveyed now believing potholes to be a bigger issue
than they were three years ago. Why will the Government not take
action and reverse their highway maintenance funding cuts?
Labour has long demanded action on the issue of smart motorways,
and it is a tragedy that lives have been lost waiting for the
Minister to act. The Office for Rail and Road has found that
stopped vehicle detection technology is failing to meet National
Highways’ minimum requirements.
(in the Chair)
Order. I remind the hon. Lady that the debate is about junction
28 of the M1. We are going slightly out of scope.
I would like to carry on talking about smart motorways, Ms
McVey.
(in the Chair)
Order. They are not the topic of the debate; today’s debate is
about improvements on junction 28 of the M1.
It is absolutely vital that the Government do something about
this issue. I think they will have listened to the hon. Member
for Bolsover, but in the end, as I have highlighted, commitment
has not been shown when it comes to funding ways of maintaining
roads, growing productivity and delivering the levelling-up
agenda promised in the manifesto on which many Members were
elected. I urge the Minister to explain to us whether he is going
to support this project, following the eloquent speeches that
Government Members have made.
5.19pm
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport ( )
It is an absolute pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Ms
McVey, and to respond to the speech made by my hon. Friend the
Member for Bolsover ()—the best of Bolsover. He
has raised some very important points, as have my hon. Friends
the Members for Ashfield () and for Amber Valley (), who have helped the hon.
Member for Bolsover champion improvements to junction 28 of the
M1. It is a tribute to my hon. Friend and his ability to pull in
colleagues that they are here to support him.
Junction 28 is an important intersection with the A38, connecting
the communities of Alfreton in the west and Sutton-in-Ashfield
and Mansfield in the east to the vital strategic road network. My
hon. Friend the Member for Bolsover is a passionate advocate for
his constituency, and indeed for the wider region and all those
areas that the last Labour Government—in fact, several Labour
Governments—left behind for so long. I congratulate him on
securing this debate. More broadly, he is clearly not only a
fantastic political champion but a real local champion, getting
Midlands Connect onside and achieving local cross-party support.
That shows exactly the sort of MP he is, standing up for his
constituents in Bolsover.
The M1 is Britain’s oldest and longest motorway. I think my hon.
Friend will agree that it is possibly one of the most significant
pieces of national infrastructure in our country. It is the spine
of our country’s road network. It has connected north and south
for more than half a century—long enough to have had the father
of my hon. Friend the Member for Ashfield work on it. It will
continue to play that vital role for decades to come. Therefore,
the importance that the Government place on this junction cannot
be understated, nor can its role in supporting national, regional
and local development, particularly across both the Derbyshire
and the Nottinghamshire areas.
I am sure we can all agree that reliable, resilient transport
links can be a catalyst for enterprise and growth. That is why
this Government have invested record amounts in our country’s
strategic road network since the first road investment strategy
was announced. RIS1 took place between 2015 and 2020 and invested
£15.2 billion. RIS2, which we are currently in, has almost double
that investment, at £27.4 billion I am very hopeful that, with
the entreaties of Members such as my hon. Friend the Member for
Bolsover, the Treasury will listen and ensure that we get extra
funding in RIS3 from 2025 onwards.
Of the £24 billion currently being invested in this period, £12.5
billion is being spent on operation and maintenance—to answer to
the questions posed by the Opposition spokesperson, the hon.
Member for Sheffield, Brightside and Hillsborough ()—and the renewal of the
existing network, including beginning the structural renewals and
concrete road surface replacements where the network is reaching
the end of its design life following its creation decades ago.
Over £10 billion is being spent on improving the performance of
the network, supporting the Government’s broader levelling-up
agenda and underpinning national and regional growth.
It was an absolute pleasure to hear from my hon. Friends the
Members for Ashfield and for Bolsover about their positivity for
their areas and about what they want to see for their
communities. They want to see jobs and investment. They are not
asking for handouts for the day to day. What they want to see is
investment to deliver jobs and opportunities for the long term
for their constituents.
Work is well under way to prepare for the third road investment
strategy beyond 2025. Negotiations are literally happening over
the coming weeks between the Secretary of State for Transport,
Treasury officials and Ministers. As part of these preparations
for the future network, we are seeking to identify ways to
improve it and important schemes.
The case for improving junction 28 of the M1 is well understood,
and the work of my hon. Friend the Member for Bolsover and
regional partners has been exemplary, with extensive
parliamentary engagement to work with key stakeholders, such as
the roundtable he hosted last year, which brought together
businesses and local authorities to consider and strengthen the
case for improvements. This work has been supported, as he
mentioned in his speech, by the regional, sub-national transport
body, Midlands Connect, which highlighted the scheme as an
investment priority for the midlands within its strategic
transport plan, and the strong local support for improvements to
the junction.
As we plan for the future of the strategic road network, National
Highways, as the network operator, is required to produce a
series of strategies covering the country, which will inform its
assessment of the current performance of the network and its
future needs. Strategies review the performance, pressures and
opportunities on each part of the network, and the issues
associated with junction 28 and the potential interventions to
alleviate congestion and improve safety will be considered
principally in the London to Scotland east route strategy. As
part of the process, National Highways has spent much of 2021 and
2022 engaging with vital local stakeholders in the region.
Using the evidence gathered as part of the development of the
route strategies, National Highways has been conducting extensive
analysis and preliminary study work on junction 28 already. This
will assist its understanding of what options are feasible and
also can address key safety concerns in the short term, which
were mentioned by my hon. Friend the Member for Amber Valley,
among others. My hon. Friend the Member for Bolsover has been
party to this work as it has developed and has provided helpful
insights to National Highways. I can confirm that a significant
proportion of the preliminary study work will conclude in
February. I encourage my hon. Friend and other hon. Members, as
well as local stakeholders, to engage with National Highways to
discuss its findings.
As I am sure my hon. Friend understands, considerable effort and
work is required to develop solutions from the ground up, and
when dealing with the significant sums involved for even a
comparatively modest investment in the network, investment
decisions cannot be taken in isolation. Rather, they need to be
considered as part of the wider development of the road
investment strategy.
The core principle of our strategy is to create a road network
that is safe, accessible and reliable for all road users and that
meets the needs of those who use it. Ultimately, final decisions
on the balance of RIS3, the third road investment strategy, and
possible enhancement schemes to be included in it will not be
finalised until the road investment strategy is published in
2024, accompanied by the significant analytical work that has got
us to that point. My hon. Friend has made a very important
contribution to that today.
Perhaps junction 29 is for another Westminster Hall debate, as my
hon. Friend suggested. I know that he enjoys seeing me almost as
much as I enjoy seeing him, so I hope he will be successful in
that venture. I urge him to write to me about his local road
lowering project, because even if it is not something that the
Department would involve itself in directly, I would be very
happy to engage with local stakeholders to see if we can do more
in that sphere.
I would like to close by thanking my hon. Friend the Member for
Bolsover and my hon. Friends the Members for Ashfield and for
Amber Valley for supporting him in this debate. I also thank him
for his commendable efforts on behalf of his constituents, the
region and the whole country. As someone who regularly drives
from Westminster to County Durham, I can tell him that I have
seen those queues on the M1 before weaving off further north and
merging into the A1 as I head to my constituency. It is vital for
the whole country and its connectivity, not just the region.
I want to make clear that the Government recognise the concerns
regarding junction 28 and the many positive benefits of seeing it
improved, as my hon. Friend highlighted, including its
benefits-cost ratio and other factors. My hon. Friends the
Members for Bolsover, for Ashfield and for Amber Valley have
really shown their commitment to the long-term project that is
levelling up the UK outside London via jobs, accessibility to
education, training and skills. Transport, as my hon. Friend the
Member for Ashfield said, is a vital part of that. My hon.
Friends epitomise the positive 2019 generation of Conservative
MPs who want to make a real difference to their communities.
I will ensure that my officials work closely with National
Highways as its study work concludes to understand the
feasibility of options for the junction, and that all Members are
fully engaged and kept up to speed with its progress. I encourage
my hon. Friends and local stakeholders to continue to advocate
for improvements as the investment plan for RIS3 develops over
the coming year or so—not just for his constituents in South
Normanton and Pinxton, but for the wider region and, in fact, the
whole country.
5.28pm
We have had a fantastic debate in which we have all agreed about
everything, and the Minister is going to go forward and sort this
project out. I thank my hon. Friend the Member for Amber Valley
for first of all giving us live traffic updates—that is a first
for me in Westminster—but for also touching on some of the
east-west connectivity issues. He mentioned the regional economic
argument and the housing issues, and in particular issues about
the design of the roundabout, which National Highways has been
looking at in some detail.
I feel like my hon. Friend the Member for Ashfield had his
Weetabix this morning. We heard of his family connections and he
gave us a tour de force on levelling up and what is happening in
our region. We are, of course, the warehouse of the country,
although we have great aspirations for other industries,
including many green industries, to come to our region as
well.
I thank the shadow Minister, the hon. Member for Sheffield,
Brightside and Hillsborough, whom I am incredibly fond of.
Indeed, she is a Sheffield MP, although she did not out herself
as such, and so is part of this regional debate. I am slightly
bereft that she got cut off in her flow on smart motorways,
because I felt like she was just getting to the good bit.
I would also, of course, like to thank the Minister. He has done
a number of Westminster Hall debates this week and is a superb
operator and a fantastic Minister. I feel safer with him in
position when it comes to investing in our road network. I thank
him for his many kind comments.
Most of all, I would like to thank you, Ms McVey, because this
was by far the best chaired Westminster Hall debate I have ever
been to.
(in the Chair)
The question is, is there no end to Mark Fletcher’s buttering
up?
Question put and agreed to.
Resolved,
That this House has considered the potential merits of
improvements to junction 28 of the M1.
|
