The CMA is consulting on proposals from ESS to allow schools to
  escape longer-term software contracts due to concerns that the
  lack of notice given to them limited their choice and
  competition.
  Education Software Solutions Limited (ESS) is the largest
  provider of school management information system (MIS) software
  in England and Wales. In the UK, most state schools are required
  to have an MIS in place to handle information on staff and
  students including for handling attendance and safeguarding.
  In April 2022, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) opened
  an investigation into whether ESS’ conduct was anti-competitive
  by effectively limiting schools’ ability to choose an MIS
  software provider and excluding its competitors. The CMA was
  concerned about ESS providing that its customers – schools in
  England and Wales – must move to three-year contracts, from their
  previous one-year contracts, without giving them sufficient time
  to make alternative arrangements with other software providers.
  The CMA was concerned that these changes reduced schools’ choice
  of MIS software provider and made it difficult for other
  providers to compete with ESS to win business.
  ESS has offered to give legally binding assurances, known as
  commitments, which would enable certain schools – broadly those
  schools which had been given insufficient time to switch
  providers – to apply to an independent adjudicator for a new
  break clause to allow them to escape their current three-year
  contract with ESS and choose alternative providers.
  If the CMA accepts commitments, that does not itself entail a
  finding that the business giving the commitments has breached
  competition law, and in this case the CMA notes that ESS
  maintains that its behaviour was not anti-competitive.
  The CMA considers that the proposed commitments address its
  competition concerns by giving affected schools the choice to
  exit their current three-year contract and switch to another MIS
  supplier, facilitating competition.
  It is now inviting comments from schools, and others likely to be
  affected by the commitments, including on the eligibility
  criteria to apply for the new break clause and on any matters
  that may affect the effective implementation of the proposed
  commitments – for example, on the application form to be used. If
  accepted by the CMA, the commitments would bring the
  investigation to an end.
  Further details about how to respond to this consultation are set
  out in the notice of the proposed commitments issued by the CMA
  today. Comments on the proposed commitments should be received by
  no later than 5.00pm on 8 December 2022.
  Further details about the CMA’s investigation can be found on the
  case page.
  Notes for editors
  - The competition legislation relevant to the CMA’s
  investigation is the Competition Act 1998 (the Act). The Chapter
  II prohibition in the Act prohibits any conduct on the part of
  one or more undertakings which amounts to the abuse of a dominant
  position in a market, and which may affect trade within the UK.
  
 
  - On 26 April 2022, the CMA launched an investigation into a
  suspected breach of competition law – a suspected abuse of
  dominance – in the supply of MIS software in the UK by ESS.
  
 
  - Where the CMA has begun an investigation under the Act, it
  may accept commitments for the purposes of addressing the
  competition concerns it has identified. If the CMA proposes to
  accept the commitments, the CMA will consult third parties who
  might be affected by these commitments and allow them an
  opportunity to give their views to the CMA. The CMA will consider
  any such views before deciding finally whether or not to accept
  the commitments.
  
 
  - Formal acceptance of commitments would result in the CMA
  ending its investigation and not proceeding to any decision on
  whether ESS has infringed the Act.
  
 
  - The CMA has also considered whether or not to grant interim
  measures, under section 35 of the Act, in relation to this case.
  Formally accepting commitments, bringing the concern to an end,
  would make it unnecessary to make any interim measures directions
  in this case.