Tabled by
  
  
  
  To ask His Majesty’s Government what steps they are taking in
  response to reports of long ambulance waits for serious
  conditions, including heart attacks and strokes.
  
   (Lab)
  
  On behalf of my noble friend , and with his
  permission, I beg leave to ask the Question standing in his name
  on the Order Paper.
  
  The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Health
  and Social Care () (Con)
  
  I hope I will get better at this with practice.
  
  We are increasing NHS capacity to reduce delays and support
  ambulance services in getting to patients as quickly as possible.
  This includes action to deliver the equivalent of 7,000 extra NHS
  beds and £500 million in funding to help speed up patient
  discharge. NHS England is providing direct support to our most
  challenged hospitals on ambulance handover delays, as well as
  £150 million of additional funding for ambulance trusts and a
  further £20 million to upgrade the ambulance fleet.
  
   (Lab)
  
  My Lords, has the Minister been able to watch the ITV
  investigation broadcast in which we saw case after case of
  paramedics graphically describing the desperate situations they
  are trying to deal with? I note that, in response, his
  departmental spokesperson said that they recognised the problem.
  Will the Minister agree to report back to your Lordships’ House
  on what the Government are doing, when and how, to ensure that
  people are not left waiting for ambulances, particularly with the
  anticipated winter crisis on the horizon?
  
   (Con)
  
  I thank the noble Baroness. I have been made aware of the TV
  series and it is on my watch list. I am looking forward to going
  out overnight on an ambulance control shortly to learn at first
  hand. Tomorrow, I am visiting ambulance response teams and
  leaders in the field in the Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells area.
  Ambulances are of key importance; they are the “A” in the ABCD
  plan, and that plan very much features in everything we are
  doing. We are active on that and will rightly report, as we are
  here, on a continuing basis, and, as the noble Baroness knows,
  regularly report the statistics to ensure that we are on top of
  the problem.
  
   (Con)
  
  My Lords, the delayed response to category 1 incidents by
  ambulances is really due to a systems failure, whereby those who
  should be treated in the community are unable to be, and those
  who are in hospital blocking beds are unable to go back into the
  community, where they should be treated. I ask my noble friend
  the Minister what plans there are to improve social care. I also
  congratulate him on answering four Questions today. As a nurse, I
  prescribe a strong drink at the end of the afternoon.
  
   (Con)
  
  I thank my noble friend for probably the best advice and question
  I have received in my marathon series. I could answer her
  question at great length, because I agree that this is a
  whole-system issue and we need a whole-system response. I would
  happily talk about every aspect of that but I will pick up just a
  couple of the specific points that she made. Social care is
  clearly vital to this. That is what the £500 million discharge
  fund is for. We are all aware—noble Lords have probably heard me
  say it enough times—that 13% of our beds are occupied in this
  way. As my noble friend states, an ambulance will visit a home
  and 50% of the time will not end up conveying someone into
  hospital. Is having an ambulance there, with three people in it,
  the best use of our resources when perhaps a paramedic on a bike
  could solve it just as well? In a similar vein, my understanding
  is that roughly 50% of all A&E attendances are people who do
  not really need emergency treatment. Again, that goes to the
  point about making sure that they have opportunities to receive
  primary care appointments, which is what the pledge to increase
  appointments by 50 million is all about. This is a whole-system
  problem and something that we are working on with a whole-system
  approach.
  
   (Lab)
  
  The Minister referred to the ABCD. I remember from when I read
  about it—it treats us rather like kindergarten children, does it
  not? —that “A” is for “ambulances”. But the big idea for
  ambulances in that document from the former Deputy Prime Minister
  was to create an auxiliary ambulance service. As the problem with
  the ambulance service at the moment is getting patients out of
  ambulances and into hospitals, what good will an auxiliary
  ambulance service do if it merely gets more people into hospital
  car parks, where more of them are waiting in more ambulances?
  
   (Con)
  
  The noble Lord is referring to the whole-system issue here, which
  I mentioned before. There is a £450 million investment to
  increase capacity in A&E facilities; that has already worked
  to upgrade 120 trusts to enable them to offload quickly. There
  are also 7,000 extra beds, and the £500 million social care
  discharge fund is all about freeing up more beds so that
  ambulances can discharge quicker.
  
   (CB)
  
  My Lords, I must declare that I am a former deputy chair of an
  ambulance trust that was an exceptional performer but is no
  longer, associated with the fact that, in some circumstances, it
  cannot get patients admitted to two of its largest local
  hospitals in under four hours. The problem is social care, not
  increasing the number of ambulances on the roads. Will the
  Government consider much more innovative approaches to respite
  care support for people who are ready to leave hospital and whose
  families cannot afford to leave work to look after them but, with
  incentives, probably could do so? That would be a practical way
  of moving the system forward at the moment.
  
   (Con)
  
  I agree with the noble Baroness that social care is a key
  solution to all this. As I said, that is what is behind the 13%
  of beds that are currently blocked and the £500 million spend in
  this area. However, we can be more innovative. That is what the
  virtual ward initiative, which I saw working so well in Watford,
  is about; it has reduced reattendance rates after 90 days from
  46% to around 8% for COPD patients. This is an area where we need
  focus and innovation, and which is very much top of my
  agenda.
  
   (LD)
  
  My Lords, as the Minister has already suggested, part of the
  problem is unnecessary call-outs to ambulance services for people
  who do not need admission to hospital. Care homes regularly call
  on ambulance services to lift their fallen residents, even though
  more than 45% are uninjured and do not require transportation to
  hospital. If care homes had the right equipment to lift people
  safely, an ambulance may not be needed after a fall. Some
  ambulance services are providing this kind of equipment to care
  homes, from their own resources, to reduce the number of
  unnecessary call-outs. Should we not ensure that all such homes
  and blocks of sheltered accommodation have access to this kind of
  equipment, which would get people up more quickly, reduce the
  number of call- outs and save money?
  
   (Con)
  
  Many noble Lords have talked today about what is a whole-system
  problem, which the noble Lord has mentioned in terms of care
  homes. It is all about treating people in the right place, with
  the right equipment, so I absolutely agree with this approach. It
  is the approach that we are taking to make sure that people are
  treated in the right place, so I will take the noble Lord’s
  suggestion back to the department.
  
   (Con)
  
  My Lords, I remind the House of my interest in the Dispensing
  Doctors’ Association. My noble friend has rightly identified the
  problem of underfunding in primary care. What is he going to do
  at this time to address the chronic underfunding in the delivery
  of primary care in rural areas?
  
   (Con)
  
  The government pledge of 50 million additional appointments is
  across the country. It is the job of the ICBs to make sure that
  each area is well catered for; the idea is that this is felt in
  every area, including rural areas. I am glad to say that we are
  making good progress on our target to increase appointments by 50
  million and, rest assured, I am working with the integrated care
  boards and their systems to ensure that they touch every part of
  England, including rural areas.
  
   (CB)
  
  My Lords, the Minister said that this is a systems failure. Who
  in the Government is responsible and when will the system be
  fixed?
  
   (Con)
  
  I think I said this is a systems issue. It is something on which
  we—including me and the Secretary of State—are very focused,
  because we need to address it across the piece. That is what the
  ABCD plan is all about. I am very confident that, over the coming
  weeks and months, we will start to see improvements from the
  investment we are making in 7,000 more beds and £500 million more
  into adult social care discharge.