Scattergun handouts or “quasi-nationalisation” will waste money and
not do enough for the most in need, finds new
report responding to soaring Ofgem price cap
Emergency ‘tax cuts’ for the poorest workers and a targeted welfare
boost are needed to help the most vulnerable households survive the
autumn surge in the cost of living, according to a new report from
top think tank the Centre for Social Justice (CSJ).
...Request free trial
- Scattergun handouts or “quasi-nationalisation” will waste
money and not do enough for the most in need, finds new
report responding to soaring Ofgem price cap
Emergency ‘tax cuts’ for the poorest workers and a targeted
welfare boost are needed to help the most vulnerable households
survive the autumn surge in the cost of living, according to a
new report from top think tank the Centre for Social Justice
(CSJ).
New CSJ analysis finds that the package of support announced by
the former Chancellor in May, which gave households on benefits
an additional £1,200 and all households £400 to help cope with
spiking energy bills, now falls “worryingly short” of
protecting the most vulnerable from worsening inflation over
the months leading into winter.
Ofgem announced today that October’s energy price cap will soar
to £3,549, compared to £2,800 as expected when the former
Chancellor’s package was put together, and is predicted to
exceed £5,300 by January.
This spells “financial ruin, family breakdown and severe
indebtedness” if urgent action is not taken, argues the CSJ in
a new report entitled On Target: Protecting vulnerable
households from the inflation crisis to be published this
weekend.
With privileged access to real-time data on 114,000 low-income
households, CSJ research found that even when taking into
account the former Chancellor’s May support package, the
worst-off families with children are likely to see their real
terms incomes fall by a staggering £490 between October
and January alone. This compares to £285 for lone
parents, £129 for single households and an average
loss this autumn of £209 across all the low-income households
included in the analysis.1
In response the CSJ is now calling for a combined package of a
targeted welfare boost and effective ‘tax cuts’. This includes
uprating Universal Credit by 13.3 per cent in October
2022, which would give more help to larger households facing
higher bills (such as families with children) than earlier
packages. This would see 8.5 million households receive an
additional £219 on average over a three-month period
(including those on legacy benefits and pension credit), rising
to £243 for lone parents and £413 for
families with children.
The CSJ’s proposals also include an effective ‘tax cut’ for the
poorest workers worth £842 million by restoring Work Allowances
in Universal Credit to their 2015 levels.2 This
would see around 1.87 million hard-up working
households keep more of their own money before seeing their
Universal Credit tapered off, boosting incomes annually by an
average of £449. This, the CSJ argue, would help struggling
workers take advantage of the booming jobs market to better
defend themselves against the harms of
inflation.
The combined package, which also incorporates a suspension of
controversial ‘Green Levies’ on energy bills, would see
low-income households receive an additional £257 in the
three months from October (rising to £281 for lone parents and
£451 for families with children) – enough to neutralise the
larger fall in incomes now expected due to worsening
inflation.3
The proposals come off the back of criticism that the
‘scattergun approach’ of handouts, which are administered as
flat-rate payments, does not sufficiently target help to
households with the highest energy bills, including
families with children. Moreover, around £2.3 billion of £400
energy bill rebates already announced will go to the richest
fifth of households as of October, the CSJ estimate, while the
Labour Party’s proposed energy bills freeze is criticised for
treating the wealthiest households who can afford higher prices
the same as poorer households who are set to face “extremely
tough choices this winter”.
Instead, the CSJ is calling for a renewed focus on those likely
to struggle the most – and for a ‘special fiscal
event’ addressing the cost of living to be held in September,
if necessary before wider economy and fiscal policy is prepared
for the Autumn Budget.
The highly targeted package, the CSJ argue, gives the next PM
the best chance of maximising the fiscal headroom to provide
more help for Middle Britain – either in the form of
additional direct payments or tax cuts. In total the autumn
intervention would cost £3.82 billion, paid for by the higher
than expected revenue taken in by HM Treasury through frozen
tax thresholds.
Under the plans, ministers would ditch ‘annual uprating’ in
favour of a more dynamic approach responding to the fast-moving
inflationary picture. A separate intervention would take place
in January, informed by the latest inflationary data including
the announcement of the next energy price cap. CSJ calculations
using existing forecasts suggest that a further uprating of 8.5
per cent could be needed to maintain real incomes among
low-income households between October 2022 and April 2023,
costing an additional £1.38 billion. This could bring the total
effective tax cut, welfare boost and Green Levies suspension to
£8.2 billion over the six-month period.
Joe Shalam, Policy Director at the CSJ said: “Poorer families,
especially those with children, spend a much higher proportion
of their income on energy bills than others. They are highly
exposed to the unprecedented spike in the cost of living made
worse by today’s price cap announcement. By targeting
additional support to those who need it, and letting the
poorest workers keep more of the money they earn, this package
is specifically designed to protect those at the very sharpest
edge of the cost of living crisis”.
Andy Cook, Chief Executive of the Centre for Social Justice
said: “We are all going to have to tighten our belts this
winter, but our highly focused approach on the most vulnerable
in society is the best way to protect those most at risk, and
leave headroom for the new PM to reduce the pressure on middle
Britain.”
The CSJ spotlight stories told across the think tank’s UK
network of community-based charities, which relay the
devastating impact of the cost of living crisis on the most
vulnerable:
“We are finding that many more people are now coming to us in
crisis and finding that crisis point is coming much quicker
than it previously did. We have come straight out of a pandemic
and hit people with a cost of living crisis. When the headlines
in the papers say 'heat or eat' this is not an exaggeration,
this is happening.”
CSJ Alliance charity, Bridlington,
Yorkshire
“The current cost of living has had a significant impact on the
families we support. It has had both a negative impact on
pupil's education but also their mental health as they see
parents struggling with costs. One pupil was missing a Thursday
and Friday of school; we found out later it was because their
mum had only enough money for fuel to fill the car up
Monday-Wednesday.”
CSJ Alliance charity, Craigavon, Northern
Ireland
“An elderly lady recently came to us asking if she could come
here every day to get warm as she simply couldn't afford to
keep the heating on during the day.”
CSJ Alliance charity, Gorton, East
Manchester
“The more families are under pressure, the more children will
suffer and not only in terms of their emotional and cognitive
development but also nutrition and health. The rising
stresses in life will take over”
CSJ Alliance charity, Wallasey,
Merseyside
Joe Shalam, Policy Director at the CSJ, is available for
interview and comment.
ENDS
NOTES TO EDITORS
1. The CSJ commissioned Policy in
Practice to produce an illustrative analysis of the expected
fall in real incomes affecting low-income households with a
sample of 114,000 low-income households on HB and/or Council
Tax Support in six local authorities across different regions
of the UK in July 2022. The ‘administrative data’ used in the
analysis provides detailed information on low-income household
demographics covering a large population size. In order to
calculate the average fall in real incomes across different
household types, analysts used data from the ONS Family
Spending Workbook to uprate low-income household expenditure
(equivalised based on household size and characteristics) in
line with October and January inflationary forecasts from the
Bank of England, Ofgem’s October price cap (as announced on 26
August) and upcoming energy price cap rises projected by
Cornwall Insights – factoring in the £400 energy rebate.
2. Work Allowances are the amount
of money Universal Credit claimants keep before their benefits
are tapered away. Work Allowances were cut as part of former
Chancellor George Osborne’s cuts to welfare in the 2015 Budget.
Restoring Work Allowances represents an effective ‘tax cut’ as
it helps to reduce the large effective marginal tax rates
(EMTRs) experienced by benefit claimants, which reduce the
incentives to increase working hours and earnings.
3. The impact of the combined
welfare and effective ‘tax cut’ package for low-income
households proposed by the CSJ is set out the chart below.

4. The full list of
recommendations proposed in Alleviating the Crisis are as
follows:
-
Recommendation: The Government should
take the earliest opportunity to hold another special fiscal
event, laying the appropriate legislation required to direct
additional financial assistance to individuals and families who
are facing higher inflationary pressures than previously
forecast.
-
Recommendation: The Government should
introduce a ‘proactive uprating’ of benefits in October 2022 to
reflect inflation of 13.3 per cent for a three-month period.
This would see the average household on Universal Credit
receive an additional £219 over the emergency period rising to
£413 for families with children.
-
Recommendation: The Government should
commit now to holding another special fiscal event in January,
in order to provide additional support to maintain real income
levels among the most vulnerable households, informed by
up-to-date analysis of the changing inflationary picture.
-
Recommendation: Work allowances should be
restored to their pre-2016 level. This would represent an
effective ‘tax cut’ for 1.87 million of the poorest working
households worth £842 million and additional £449 on
average.
-
Recommendation: The Government should
mirror the ‘proactive uprating’ with a payment for people on
mean-tested benefits including legacy benefits and pension
credit. This would total £219 and could be distributed via
local authorities using local administrative data in order to
target support proportionally by household type.
-
Recommendation: environmental and
renewables levies should, where legally possible, be paused for
the duration of the current energy crisis, boosting household
incomes by £153 annually and bringing the package of autumn
support for households on low incomes up to around £257
(excluding the additional income working households would
receive from the restoration of Work Allowances).
-
Recommendation: Debt repayment to
government bodies within UC should be suspended for 6 months,
as it was at the beginning of the Covid pandemic, to allow
households to adjust to turbulent energy prices.
-
Recommendation: Tax credit debt resulting
from HMRC overpayments that is older than three years should be
remitted.
-
Recommendation: The maximum level at
which debts and benefit overpayments can be recovered through
UC should be reduced to 10 per cent of the standard
allowance.
-
Recommendation: The Illegal Money Lending
Team should be allocated additional funding to scale up its
operation in light of the cost-of-living crisis.
-
Recommendation: The Government should
overhaul the Credit Union Act 1979 to address the key
challenges preventing credit union growth.
-
Recommendation: The Government should
initiate the rollout of Universal Support, jointly administered
by the Department for Work & Pensions and Department for
Levelling Up, Housing & Communities, to help those furthest
from the labour market take advantage of rising job
vacancies.
|