Education must be at heart of prison system, say MPs, as new
report highlights freefall in quality of and engagement with
existing provision.
Almost two thirds of prison
inspections show poor quality management of the quality of
education, skills and work, and the number ranked 'good' or
'outstanding' has fallen dramatically in the past year. At the
same time, the number of prisoners participating in education
qualifications has plummeted. In the year 2017/18, the number of
prisoners participating in a course equivalent to AS-levels or
above showed a 90% decreasecompared
to the 2010/11 academic year.
In a new report, the House of Commons Education Select Committee
highlights the cracks in a clunky, chaotic, disjointed system
which does not value education as the key to rehabilitation. This
is, say MPs, despite clear data showing
that prisoners who participate in education whilst incarcerated
are 7.5 percentage points less likely to reoffend than those who
don't.
Recognising employment as one of the core pathways to
rehabilitation, the Committee campaigned for prisoners to be
allowed to study for apprenticeships, a recommendation which the
Education and Justice Secretaries accepted in February 2022. This
is, says the report, a welcome ‘renewed focus on prison
education’.
However, without significant reform throughout prison education,
many prisoners lack the support and tools still needed. The
report underlines the failure of prisons to assess the individual
educational capabilities and needs of every prisoner, and to
identify prisoners with special educational needs and
disabilities (SEND). Without rigorous educational screening,
access to the support and services needed is severely restricted,
hampering the ability of prisoners to engage with educational
courses.
Key findings include
-
Failure to assess educational needs
- Over 30% of prisoners face
learning challenges, although this is likely to be a gross
underestimate, given that until 2019, self-assessment was the
primary tool used to determine educational needs.
- The Government's "two-part screening tool", introduced to
identify learning difficulties, is not adequate to identify
prisoners with additional learning needs and is not consistent
across every prison.
- There are only 25 qualified Special
Educational Needs Co-ordinators (SENCo) across all public
prisons, equating to around one SENCo for every four prisons.
-
Education undervalued and under
resourced
- The 2016 Coates Review of
prison education recommended that prisons place education at
the heart of the system. Six years later, this ambition has not
been pursued or met, and the quality of prison education has
declined.
-
Learning is disincentivised
- Prison education is often paid at a lower rate than unskilled
work, acting as a disincentive to engage with education- with
which many prisoners have had previously negative experiences.
- Prisoners' education is severely hampered by transfer between
different institutions, as the transfer of educational records is
often delayed, or does not happen at all, leaving
transferred prisoners disheartened and often leading to the
abandonment of studies.
-
Incentives must be provided- to prisoners and
businesses
- The proportion of former prisoners in P45 employment on year
after release is just 17%, but data
shows that employment is one of the most important factors in
reducing reoffending.
- The Government's commitment to improving the links between
prisons and businesses is welcome.
-
A digital divide
- The majority of prisons in England and Wales do not have the
cabling or hardware to support broadband, stifling opportunities
to learn remotely though courses such as the Open
University.
- Lack of digital access is widening the digital divide between
prisoners and the wider population, restricting the ability to
acquire employment and life skills. A change in attitude to
technology in prisons is long overdue.
Recommendations
-
Rigorous assessments: The Government must
introduce a rigorous screening and assessment process
to evaluate the educational needs of each prisoner.
Consistent across prisons, the process would determine levels
of ability and identify prisoners with SEND and additional
learning needs. The outdated education data and case management
platform currently used is not fit for purpose, and must be
re-designed to allow multiple learning difficulties to be
identified and recorded. Funding must be properly allocated to
allow for one Special Educational Needs Co-ordinators (SENCo)
per prison.
-
Culture shift within prisons: There must be a
'culture shift' within prisons, embedding education within
institutions. The Government must demonstrate its commitment to
this aim by appointing a Deputy Governor of Learning for each
prison. Prisons should also have clear and meaningful KPIs
related to education, employment and training, which would be
monitored by Ofsted.
-
Individual digital education passports:
Digital education passports should be introduced, containing a
record of each prisoner's learning and educational needs, which
would facilitate better transfer of studies across the prison
estate. Prisoners' ongoing education- and whether their studies
can be sustained- should also be taken into account when
considering moving prisoners. The Government must also consider
incentivising learning for prisoners who can demonstrate
progress with their studies, including pay equal to prison
work.
-
Financial incentives for businesses:
Businesses must be encouraged- through financial incentives- to
overcome reservations about employing former prisoners. In any
future review of the Apprenticeship Levy, the Government must
allow businesses to direct the Levy towards prisoner
rehabilitation schemes. The Government must also commit to
publishing a clear timetable, setting out the roll-out of
employment hubs across the prison estate and the establishment
of Employment Advisers within the prison system.
-
Transformation of digital infrastructure: The
Government must carry out an audit of physical infrastructure
necessary to provide high level of education across the prison
estate. Prisoners must be equipped with the digital skills
necessary for good employment opportunities upon leaving
prisons. Using technology for educational purpose only,
which allows access to be restricted to approved content
which can be monitored, prisoners should be permitted digital
resources to study.
Chair's comment
Chair of the Education Select Committee, the Rt Hon MP said:
“For the majority of offenders, prison must be a place where an
old life ends, and a new one begins. The key to starting again is
education. Education- from a practical apprenticeship to a
masters' degree- increases employability, one of the most
important factors in reducing reoffending. The argument for
placing education at the heart of the prison system is a
no-brainer: prisoners who engage with education and those who
find employment on release are statistically less likely to
reoffend.
"Yet, six years after these points were set out to the Government
in a landmark review, prison education is in a chaotic place.
Shambolic transfer of records, no assessment for educational
needs and the lack of access to modern learning tools add up to
paint a dismal picture. The Government has shown its commitment
to enabling ex-prisoners to climb the ladder of opportunity by
extending the apprenticeship scheme to prisoners, and I thank
and for recognising how important
this is. However, there must be a root-and-branch overhaul that
extends throughout prison culture.
"The prison system must be held accountable for preventing
re-offending, and therefore for making education accessible and
high quality. I urge the Government to carefully consider the
steps set out in the Committee's report, which would reframe
learning within the prison system."