Extract on workplace parking levy from First Minister's
questions in the Scottish Parliament
: ...All that the First
Minister is doing is replacing ScotRail with SNP rail. There will
be a different owner but the same problems, and while public
transport services are being cut, her Government has turned
against drivers as well. She has abandoned plans to improve
roads, and now she is putting in the workplace parking tax,
without any cap on the amount that people will be forced to pay.
When it was first proposed, organisations such as the Educational
Institute of Scotland, the Scottish Police Federation and Unite
the union warned about the costs that would fall on teachers,
police officers, care staff and shift workers. All those warnings
were completely ignored by and her Government.
This week, the Scottish Retail Consortium said that the workplace
parking tax is
“a recipe for extra cost and complexity”,
and today the AA is warning that
“workers are going to be hit with . . . levies of as much as
£1,000”.
People are already on the brink, with bills increasing and the
cost of living rising. Why is the Government in favour of a
costly workplace parking tax at the same time?
The First Minister...Let me turn to the workplace parking levy. I
remind that it gives a discretionary
power to local authorities. They do not have to use it if they do
not want to or if they do not think that it reflects their local
circumstances. Of course, I would remind that, in the Tories’ last
local government manifesto—although I grant that this was before
he was leader of the Scottish Conservatives—they said:
“We need to empower councils and give them a renewed sense of
meaning and purpose.”
We are giving discretionary powers to local authorities and what
do we have? The Scottish Conservatives opposing it and moaning
about it.
The second point is that the workplace parking levy is simply
giving local authorities in Scotland a power that local
authorities in England have had for a decade and more, which is
allowed to them by the Conservative Government. Not for the first
time, there is a deep hypocrisy at the heart of Douglas Ross’s
question.
Source