CQC takes urgent action at Birmingham care home for people with a learning disability and autistic people
|
The Care Quality Commission (CQC) has taken action against a
Birmingham service for people living with a learning disability and
autistic people - following an inspection which led to it being
rated inadequate. CQC inspected Summerfield House, ran by N H Care
Limited, in August. The residential care home provides personal
care for up to five people. At the time of inspection, four people
were living at the home. Due to the serious level of concerns
found,...Request free trial
The Care Quality Commission (CQC) has taken action against a Birmingham service for people living with a learning disability and autistic people - following an inspection which led to it being rated inadequate.
CQC inspected Summerfield House, ran by N H Care Limited, in
August. The residential care home provides personal care for up
to five people. At the time of inspection, four people were
living at the home.
Due to the serious level of concerns found, CQC took urgent
action to keep people safe by placing conditions on the
service’s registration, including restricting any new
admissions to the home and requesting a report of the actions
taken and to be taken as a result of the urgent condition.
At the same time, the local authority organised an external
agency to provide managerial support in the home. Inspectors
returned to find there had been four further allegations of
physical abuse and there was no evidence these had been
investigated to consider if staff had responded appropriately
or lessons could be learnt to prevent further occurrences.
People living in the home have all been supported to move out
to alternative accommodation to ensure their safety and
wellbeing.
Summerfield House was rated inadequate overall and for being
safe, effective, responsive, caring and well-led.
Debbie Ivanova, CQC deputy chief inspector for people
with a learning disability and autistic people, said:
“Our latest inspection of Summerfield House found a truly
unacceptable service with a poor culture where abuse and people
being placed at harm had become normal, with no action taken to
prevent incidents from happening or reoccurring.
“Records showed incidents of physical, verbal and emotional
abuse incidents which had not been dealt with appropriately or
followed up. Physical assault between people had become
commonplace, made worse by a widespread lack of recognition
from staff about the inappropriate and abusive practices going
on.
“Care records and the language used by staff to speak to people
were derogatory with no thought given to people’s dignity and
wellbeing.
“We expect health and social care providers to guarantee
autistic people and people with a learning disability the
choices, dignity, independence and good access to local
communities that most people take for granted and this was not
happening.
“Services must inform CQC and other statutory bodies when they
identify safeguarding concerns such as these to ensure people’s
safety. This service’s continued failure to refer all instances
of abuse and thoroughly investigate concerns has put people at
prolonged risk of harm and created a closed culture at the
home.
“We continue to monitor the service closely and will take
further action if we are not assured the necessary and urgent
improvements are made.”
The vulnerable people at Summerfield House should have been
supported to lead confident, inclusive and empowered lives but
instead were subject to poor care, harm and abuse. Staff didn’t
support people, meet their needs or ask what their personal
needs and desires were.
People's care was based on ill-informed information rather than
a full assessment of their needs. Care plans stated they had
not been involved in reviews due to their learning disability.
Inspectors found several serious concerns on inspection,
including:
• People were not protected from abuse. Records showed
incidents of physical, verbal and emotional abuse which had not
been responded to.
• Records showed staff making threats to cancel people's
activities, call the police when people were anxious and on one
occasion use furniture to prevent a person from moving. The
staff response and approach to these incidents demonstrated a
significant lack of understanding about people's needs and the
safe management of anxiety.
• Staff did not always recognise abuse. For example, inspectors
saw a person being hit on the head by another person. This was
not recognised as a safeguarding incident and no immediate
action was taken to safeguard either person or consider how to
prevent this happening again.
• There was no record that any staff discussions had taken
place to consider the management of incidents and to discuss
inappropriate and abusive staff practices.
• Good infection prevention control practice in relation to
COVID-19 were not always followed. Some staff did not wear
masks and there was no policy in place for visitors to keep the
spread of infection to a minimum.
• Where it was identified that people were at risk of choking,
there were insufficient risk assessments in place to prevent
this from happening.
The report on Summerfield House has been
published on CQC’s website.
Notes to editor
CQC are currently carrying out a programme of work with a
focus on improving the way it registers, monitors and inspect
services, to make sure the quality of care in services for people
with a learning disability and or autistic people is good. This
work is being led by Debbie Ivanova, who was recently appointed
as a Deputy Chief Inspector for people with a learning disability
and autistic people. The programme is looking at all types of
services — from hospital services to care homes and supported
living.
The three key areas of the programme are:
1. Ensuring the right services are regulated and
registered: The recently revised guidance ‘Right Support, Right
Care, Right Culture’ will ensure people have the right model of
care.
2. Responding to risks swiftly and taking appropriate
action: With a reviewed approach to inspections of services for
people with a learning disability and autistic people, people’s
experience is at the heart of these inspections, so people won’t
be expected to continue to live in a service that doesn’t meet
their needs.
3. Pathways and healthcare: This workstream will look at
access to services, and what happens to people as they move
between health and care services.
To date, pilot inspections have been carried out in mental
health settings, with others now taking place in care settings.
These are being evaluated so that more can continue to take
place. These pilots entail:
• Spending more time observing care
• Spending more time engaging with people and the staff who
support them and their families
• Using new tools to better identify if services are
meeting the needs, aspirations and skills development of people
with a learning disability and/or autistic people.
|
