Labour calls for Electoral Commission to investigate Conservative Party spending in Hartlepool by-election
|
Angela Rayner, Labour’s Deputy Leader, has written to the Electoral
Commission calling on it to launch an investigation into the
Conservative Party’s spending in the Hartlepool by-election. It was
revealed this week that despite the Prime Minister using his
taxpayer-funded government private plane to fly to Hartlepool for a
by-election campaign visit, the Conservative Party candidate’s
spending returns stated “Nil” for spending on transport.
Electoral...Request free trial
Angela Rayner, Labour’s Deputy Leader, has written to the Electoral Commission calling on it to launch an investigation into the Conservative Party’s spending in the Hartlepool by-election. It was revealed this week that despite the Prime Minister using his taxpayer-funded government private plane to fly to Hartlepool for a by-election campaign visit, the Conservative Party candidate’s spending returns stated “Nil” for spending on transport. Electoral Commission guidance states that the cost of transport that is paid for or reimbursed by a political party or third party should be included in spending returns. Transport costs include the cost of transporting volunteers, party members, staff members or other campaigners around the electoral area or to and from the electoral area where they are undertaking campaigning on behalf of the candidate. In her letter to Bob Posner, chief executive of the Electoral Commission, Rayner calls for an investigation “to get to the bottom of whether any wrongdoing has taken place, including any further dodgy deals involving Conservative Party donors secretly paying off or reimbursing the Conservative Party or the public purse and/or clearing the Prime Minister’s debts from billing the taxpayer”. Rayner also asks that the Electoral Commision “refer to the police any evidence of illegal and criminal behaviour in breach of the Representation of the People Act, including but not limited to the non-declaration of election expenses and donations in kind, the submission of false returns and any other wrongdoing”. Ends Notes to editors
Dear Bob, I am writing to you regarding the financing of the Prime Minister’s travel for party political campaigning purposes. As you will be aware, the Prime Minister travelled by plane to campaign in the Hartlepool by-election on April 5th – within the regulated period for the by-election – however none of the costs of the Prime Minister’s travel are included in the Conservative’s spending return for the by-election, which was submitted with £0 of spend for transport. This appears to be a clear breach of the Ministerial Code which states that government resources should not be used for party political purposes, and that "where a visit is a mix of political and official engagements, it is important that the department and the Party each meet a proper proportion of the actual cost." I have already written to the Cabinet Secretary and the government’s independent adviser on ministers’ interests Lord Geidt demanding an investigation into the Prime Minister breaching the code. Electoral Commission guidance states that transport costs include the cost of transporting volunteers, party members, staff members or other campaigners around the electoral area or to and from the electoral area where they are undertaking campaigning on behalf of the candidate. Can you confirm that this includes the Prime Minister travelling around, to and from the electoral area via private plane and by car to campaign on behalf and with the candidate (as evidenced by social media posts published by Jill Mortimer)? Electoral Commission guidance also makes clear that the cost of transport that is paid for by a political party or third party or reimbursed by a political party or third party, presumably including the Conservative Party or a Conservative Party donor, should also be included in spending returns. Can you confirm that if the Prime Minister’s travel was subsequently paid for by the Conservative Party and/or a Conservative Party donor – as in the case of the redecoration of the Prime Minister’s flat – then this spending should be included in the spending return as an election expense? As you are aware given your ongoing investigation into the funding arrangements surrounding the redecoration of the Prime Minister’s flat, the Prime Minister treats the laws and rules that declare election expenses, donations and financial interests with contempt. His contempt for the rules and laws that uphold standards and integrity in our public life has polluted our politics and is having a hugely damaging impact on public trust in our politics and our democracy. I know that you take the Electoral Commission’s responsibility to promote public confidence in our democratic process and ensure its integrity is upheld with the utmost seriousness. With this in mind, I hope that in accordance with the Commission’s general duty to monitor compliance with the candidate expenditure and donation rules you will investigate this matter to get to the bottom of whether any wrongdoing has taken place, including any further dodgy deals involving Conservative Party donors secretly paying off or reimbursing the Conservative Party or the public purse and/or clearing the Prime Minister’s debts from billing the taxpayer. I trust that in the course of your inquiry you will also refer to the police any evidence of illegal and criminal behaviour in breach of the Representation of the People Act, including but not limited to the non-declaration of election expenses and donations in kind, the submission of false returns and any other wrongdoing. Given the public interest in this matter I will be making this letter public. Yours sincerely |