Despite the agreement of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA),
the UK and EU still have work to do in overcoming the significant
challenges that remain for trade in services. It is in both sides’
mutual interests to ensure that UK-EU trade in services, which was
worth £317 billion in exports and £217 billion in imports in 2019,
continues to flow as smoothly as possible.
This is the main conclusion of a new report,
‘Beyond Brexit: trade in services’, published today by the House
of Lords EU Services Sub-Committee.
Commenting on the report, the Committee’s
Chair, ,
said:
“The EU-UK trade agreement has secured
important trade liberalisation in some areas of trade in
services. However, there are some significant gaps. The EU hasn’t
granted the UK the bulk of the financial services equivalence
decisions required to enable transactions to flow freely. And the
two sides are yet to agree on future regulatory
cooperation.
“There will be real problems for UK
professionals whose qualifications are not recognised in the EU
under current arrangements. The TCA’s business mobility
provisions haven’t been fully tested because of COVID-19 travel
restrictions, but are a key concern for service providers.
Opportunities available to students and universities are
restricted without access to the Erasmus+
programme.
“The mobility provisions in the TCA will also
make it very difficult for people working in the creative
industries to tour in the EU. The Government must resolve this
issue with the EU before international travel
resumes.
“The services sector is at the heart of the UK
economy, so it is essential that the Government and EU makes
improvements to smooth UK-EU services trade. Too much is at stake
if we don’t.”
Findings and conclusions from the report
include:
-
The UK-EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement
(TCA) does not include substantive provisions on
financial services, and delays to key
decisions about the future relationship, particularly on
equivalence, mean that the sector is still in a period of
uncertainty.
The UK’s exit from the passporting regime has
led to the movement of some activity to the EU and firms facing
the challenges involved in navigating different market access
requirements in each Member State. The Committee is concerned
that over time this may lead to a big shift of people and
assets out of the UK.
The Committee recognises that the UK and the
EU will seek to change their regulatory regimes where it is in
either party’s interests, but calls on the Government not to
disregard the value of a close UK-EU relationship in financial
services.
-
The proliferation of national reservations in
the TCA means that UK professional and business
services providers face a patchwork of complicated
rules that vary by sector and Member State. This fragmentation
is likely to hit small operators the
hardest.
The lack of mutual recognition of
professional qualifications in the TCA could have a serious
impact on many sectors, so the Government and regulators should
explore all options, including a side agreement to the TCA, to
alleviate this issue. We regret the Government’s decision to
defer establishing the Partnership Council and other governance
arrangements under the TCA and urge them to review
this.
-
The creative industries
sector has been hit hard by the COVID-19 pandemic and its
recovery will depend to some extent on getting the relationship
with the EU right.
The Committee is deeply concerned about the
potential impact of mobility provisions in the TCA on the over
two million people employed in the creative industries, which
could make touring prohibitively bureaucratic and expensive.
The Government and EU should work together to remedy this
situation before international business travel
resumes.
-
The Government’s decision to associate with
the Horizon Europe programme is welcomed by the Committee and
the research and education sector. It will
enable UK researchers to continue to participate in
cutting-edge collaborative research.
The Committee regrets the Government’s
decision not to participate in the Erasmus+ programme on the
basis of cost. It is concerned that the proposed budget will
not cover the costs of the proposed domestic alternative, the
Turing scheme. The Committee does not see the Turing scheme as
a replacement for the Erasmus+ programme as it does not allow
for inbound mobility and hopes that the Government will
consider re-joining Erasmus+ in the
future.
-
More positively, the TCA offers unprecedented
cooperation on digital trade compared with
other EU free trade agreements, and it is expected that the
EU’s draft data adequacy decision will be confirmed in the
coming weeks. Both sides should work together to ensure that
these positive developments can be maintained to keep pace with
innovation in the technology sector.