, Labour’s
Shadow Secretary of State for Education, responding to Gavin
Williamson’s statement on education return and awarding
qualifications in 2021.
On these benches we want to see every pupil safely back in class,
where they can see their friends, their teachers, and get the
structure and stability they need.
But it is not enough simply to say that schools will reopen.
There must be a credible plan that will not only enable schools
to open in March, but will keep them open.
The Secretary of State has failed to use the period when most
pupils were not in school to put the necessary measures in place.
In January he said he wanted school staff to be in the next wave
of vaccinations. So why has there still been no commitment from
the government to prioritise school staff? Does he no longer
believe they should be a priority?
Many schools have lost income and face higher costs because of
the pandemic. Why has he failed to review the funding?
One way to reduce transmission of coronavirus is to allow schools
to teach on a rota basis. Labour, school leaders, and teachers
have all asked him to consider this. He has refused. Why?
Ventilation has an important role to play in reducing
transmission indoors. Will he update his department’s guidance to
ensure that it is clear, robust, and specific enough for all
schools to implement it effectively?
Can he tell me why, months after Labour called for it, he has not
made any progress in providing Nightingale Classrooms so more
pupils can study in small groups?
It is welcome the Secretary of State has finally caught-up on
Labour’s call to expand the wearing of masks in schools to reduce
transmission.
But I worry that he is taking one small step in the right
direction while leaving a great many others issues unaddressed.
He must do better if we are to keep schools open, and he must
work with, not against, teachers, school staff and unions
This year’s exams were cancelled 52 days ago. For seven weeks
pupils, parents, and staff have faced damaging and utterly
unnecessary uncertainty.
The Secretary of State could have avoided this by listening to
Labour and put a clear Plan B in place months ago. But instead he
was, once again, slow to act, with millions of young people
paying the price.
Now, he claims to have solved the problem, but guidance from exam
boards will not be available until “the end of the spring term,”
meaning more weeks of anxiety for young people and their
teachers.
The Secretary of State blamed a “rogue algorithm” for last year’s
fiasco. But the real cause of the chaos was not an algorithm, it
was his incompetence.
Now, for the first time, he has said he trusts teachers. I cannot
help but wonder why he only trusts teachers when there is a
chance to make them responsible for what happens with exams,
rather than his Department.
I am glad a wide range of evidence will be used, assessment
materials will be made available for schools, there will be
guidance from exam boards on how to award grades, and individual
schools won’t be responsible for appeals.
But how will he make grades fair and consistent between and
across schools? If the answer is teacher training, why has he not
used the last seven weeks to provide it?
Is he not concerned that the lack of common evidence, and the
lack of a link to an existing grade distribution, puts enormous
pressure on schools and colleges while creating a huge challenge
in ensuring fairness?
Mr Speaker, coming out of the pandemic, we enter a new chapter
for Britain, and children’s recovery must be at the heart of it.
It was nearly six months ago that Labour first called for a
national strategy to help children catch up and to close the
attainment gap.
I welcome the appointment of Sir to lead the
education recovery work. I hope this means the Secretary of State
is breaking from the great Conservative tradition of only finding
work for friends and donors.
But can he confirm that yesterday’s recovery announcement amounts
to just 43 pence per pupil per day over the next school year?
And that just 500,000 pupils – less than one in three of those
eligible for free school meals –will benefit from the summer
schemes?
Can he tell me why there was no mention whatsoever of the
hard-working staff who will deliver this summer’s support?
Why there is no specific support for children’s mental health and
wellbeing?
And why is there only limited support for college students?
Children’s recovery from this pandemic is a five year mission,
not a task for five months only.
Mr Speaker, this has been a very challenging year for children,
parents, and education staff, made more challenging by the
government’s incompetence.
With schools set to open their doors to more pupils in a matter
of weeks, there is a final chance to get things right.
The Secretary of State must do so.