Extract from Scottish Parliament: Questions to the Minister for Constitution, Europe and External Affairs - Jan 27
Thursday, 28 January 2021 08:00
Bob Doris (Glasgow Maryhill and Springburn) (SNP): To ask the
Scottish Government what impact European structural funds have had
on the Glasgow Maryhill and Springburn constituency in the last 15
years. (S5O-04949) The Minister for Europe and International
Development (Jenny Gilruth): European structural funding has had a
significant positive social and economic impact nationally and
locally within Bob Doris’s constituency. Approximately £11...Request free trial
(Glasgow Maryhill and Springburn) (SNP):
To ask the Scottish Government what
impact European structural funds have had on the Glasgow
Maryhill and Springburn constituency in the last 15 years.
(S5O-04949)
The Minister for Europe and International Development
():
European structural funding has had a significant
positive social and economic impact nationally and locally
within Bob Doris’s constituency. Approximately £11 million has
been invested through the current 2014-2020 European funding
programme to support individuals into meaningful employment and
to support businesses across Glasgow. An additional £2 million
has also been invested from the programme to support the
installation of new, affordable low-carbon heating systems in
social housing developments in Glasgow.
:
I know well the benefit
that European structural funds have had not just in my
constituency but across Scotland, with an estimated €944
million invested in the past seven years.
Does the minister share my concern
that the United Kingdom Government’s planned replacements—the
so-called shared prosperity and levelling-up
funds—might mean less financial support coming to Glasgow and
the rest of Scotland as a result of the UK Government’s
post-Brexit stance on structural funds, as well as less
democratic control and influence, because the UK Government,
unlike the European Union, seems intent on bypassing the
Scottish Government?
:
The decision by the UK Government to bypass the Scottish
Government in the development and roll-out of the shared prosperity fund demonstrates
a complete disregard for devolution. The UK Government has kept
us at arm’s length throughout the process. It has provided no
clarity on the fund’s objectives and delivery plans and no
evidence as to why a clearly devolved matter should no longer
be run or administered in Scotland. In respecting the
devolution agreement, the Scottish Government is best placed to
ensure that replacement funding is allocated to meet the needs
of Scotland; ignoring the devolution agreement puts at risk all
that we have achieved.
|