The Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee today held
its final hearing on the subject of the future of public service
broadcasting.
Witnesses were:
- Dame , Chief
Executive, Ofcom
- Kevin Bakhurst, Executive Director of Broadcasting and Online
Content, Ofcom
(at 11:00 am)
- Rt Hon OBE MP, Minister for Media and Data,
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
A partially edited transcript will be sent later and an
edited official transcript will be sent as soon as it is
available.
The following are the only extracts mentioning
Amazon:
: [01:37:26] Would you say that the
likes of Amazon and Netflix are deliberately
obfuscating? I mean, they don't credit content providers. For
instance, Netflix runs BBC programmes and the viewers don't know
anything about it. They don't even share data about their UK work
force. Should they and why should they?
[01:37:46][20.6]
(Minister for Media and Data,
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and
Sport): [01:37:49] I firstly welcome
the huge increase in choice which viewers have been given as a
result of people like Netflix and Amazon and of
course, Apple and Disney and indeed Discovery, all streaming
content to UK viewers. They do commission content from UK
production companies, which is again something I very strongly
welcome. There is not just programming that is obviously UK based
like the Crown, but there is also programming which is less
obviously UK based but still made in this country, something like
Sex Education, which is made in Wales by Netflix. Whether or not
they should be required to credit the independent production
company or the location or whatever is is not something that I
think is necessarily something we would want to do. But I mean,
you raise an interesting wIder question, which is that U.K.
traditional broadcasters are subject to quite stringent
requirements in terms of the broadcasting licence they hold, in
terms of some of the obligations placed on them, which has been
talking about. And then you have the video on demand services,
which are really subject to virtually no regulation or
requirements at all. If they are UK based, then they would
require some broadcasting licence. If their EU based, then they
come under AVMSD, but if they're outside Europe, then they are
not subject to anybody at all.
----
: [01:42:17] Do you think Ofcom
should have more access to more data about video on demand
services? [01:42:29][11.9]
: [01:42:32] Video on demand
services at the moment. If they are not UK based, then Ofcom has
no remit. A broadcasting licence is required if you are a UK
based service and some are. Amazon I think is UK
headquartered. [01:42:53][20.8]
: [01:42:59] What I'm trying to get
at is should the UK government be reaching out to overseas
territories? [01:43:05][5.9]
: [01:43:07] Well, it will
depend to some extent where they are based. Taking off my media
hat and putting on my other hat, which is minister for data, I'm
all in favour of data sharing and I think there great benefits
for consumers if we do enable data sharing. Now, whether or not
you can actually require data to be provided, it would require a
much greater regulation intervention. There is an argument that
you could try and require all services providing content to UK
customers to have some kind of broadcasting licence. But that,
you know, that goes a lot further than where we are at present.
And that's certainly not something we have decided, but it is
something which one could look at.
[01:43:55][47.6]