Asked by
To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the report by the
Police Foundation and The People’s Pension Protecting People’s
Pensions: Understanding and Preventing Scams, published on 7
September, what action they are taking to protect people from
pension scams.
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Work
and Pensions ()
(Con)
The Government are committed to safeguarding consumer savings. We
have introduced measures that assist all pension savers to
understand their choices and alert them to possible risks through
advice and guidance. To help protect people from scams, the
Government have banned cold calling and tightened the tax
registration procedures, and, via the Pension Schemes Bill, are
limiting the statutory right to transfer. We also continue to
raise awareness of scams through ongoing communications directly
from the DWP and through other organisations.
(Lab)
That reply was encouraging—I thank the Minister. However, I hope
that we can persuade the Government of how vital it is that even
more specific actions are taken. Tragically, some scams make the
victim complicit in the crime, so they lose all their money to
the scammer and are pursued by HMRC for tax payments for pension
liberation which they cannot meet. The police described HMRC’s
approach as “unrelenting and uncompromising”. What action will
the Government take to give some relief to these victims?
(Con)
I am sure that everybody feels sympathy for an individual placed
in this position. HMRC collects the taxes that Parliament decides
are due and seeks to treat each case sympathetically and on its
own facts. I have talked to the Minister for Pensions about this
issue and he is quite happy to meet the noble Baroness to talk
further about it.
(Con)
My Lords, I declare my interests as listed in the register. I
know that my noble friend is sympathetic on this issue. Will the
Government consider establishing a central intelligence database
to offer providers an early warning system for scams and help
potential scam victims? Can my noble friend comment on any plans
to centralise the confusing array of bodies for protecting
consumers, including ScamSmart, Action Fraud, the police,
regulators and Project Bloom?
(Con)
I assure my noble friend, and indeed the whole House, that this
issue is very high on the Government’s agenda. It is what we
would call work in progress. We have established Project Bloom,
which brings together all finance organisations, the regulator
and pension providers to see what can be done and to work
collaboratively. The Minister for Pensions met representatives to
hear their thoughts on what the industry and Government can do. I
would say, “Watch this space”.
(CB) [V]
My Lords, I welcome this timely report by the Police Foundation
and The People’s Pension. The scale of loss is staggering, as
bogus companies can set up to instigate the frauds and are often
closed quickly to avoid detection. What are the Government doing
to strengthen checks on company registration so that only genuine
companies are able to trade?
(Con)
The noble Lord makes a very good point. I think that I will need
to write to him with the detail of those checks.
The Lord Speaker ()
I call the next speaker, the noble Baroness, Lady Drake.
(Con)
My Lords, there seems to be a sound issue for those attending
virtually. I suggest that the House adjourns for five minutes.
12.23 pm
Sitting suspended.
12.28 pm
(Lab) [V]
My Lords, even where a key risk to their savings is identified
and information and red-flag warnings are given to the
individual, they can still transfer their pension, and too many
do, regardless. Pension providers and trustees have few, if any,
powers to stop this. Will the Government extend the powers of the
regulator to allow an override of the individual’s statutory
right to transfer in the event of a suspected scam, thereby
safeguarding their savings and future well-being?
(Con)
I am happy to confirm to the noble Baroness that the Minister for
Pensions has written to the chair of the Work and Pensions Select
Committee about this—I will place a copy of his letter in the
House of Lords Library—and I can confirm that the Government are
already taking further legislative action through the Pension
Schemes Bill. I say again that the Minister for Pensions is quite
prepared to meet noble Lords to discuss this issue.
(LD) [V]
What plans do the Government have to improve support for victims
of pension scams? The measures outlined in the report are
criticised as inadequate. Can the Minister say what the
Government plan to do about it?
(Con)
I apologise to the noble Baroness; I had trouble hearing her
question. Perhaps I may read Hansard and write to her directly
with a reply.
(Con) [V]
My Lords, I refer to my entry in the Members’ register. Having
heard my noble friend’s answer a moment ago to the noble
Baroness, Lady Drake, I would nevertheless like to pursue the
matter of the responsibilities of trustees and pension
administrators. We are very sympathetic to beneficiaries who are
subject to scams, but would it not be a good idea to oblige
beneficiaries who wish to transfer pension pots to be in
interpersonal contact with their administrators before that is
permitted? Much of the paperwork at the moment is part of the
scam itself, and trustees and administrators need some further
protection from their liabilities.
(Con)
I take my noble friend’s point. The contribution that he has made
just heightens the need for us to have more dialogue on this with
the Minister for Pensions. However, as I have already said, the
Government are taking further legislative action through the
Pension Schemes Bill to enable regulations to be made prescribing
conditions that, if not met, will limit an individual’s statutory
right to transfer.
(Lab) [V]
My Lords, the FCA acknowledges the increasing role of online
platforms, including social media, in promoting harmful
information to consumers, including from pension scammers.
However, the cold-calling ban that came into effect last year
does not cover online activity, and scammers can get around the
ban by first building relationships with consumers so that they
then consent to a cold call. How will the Government update the
law to keep pace with this very fast-moving digital environment,
since it is clearly increasing consumer vulnerability to scams?
(Con)
I can confirm that the Government are well aware of this issue. I
referred earlier to Project Bloom, which brings together
government departments, regulators, enforcement agencies and
industry representatives to share information and co-ordinate
actions that will deal with situations such as this. I can
confirm that we, particularly the Department for Digital,
Culture, Media and Sport, are already engaging with technology
companies.
(Non-Afl) [V]
My Lords, this study report is most welcome but there is an area
that needs looking at for the future. Ethnic minority pensioners
are said to be 24% worse off than white pensioners; indeed, the
average total pension of BAME women is 51% less than that of
white men. This pension inequality will become starker as the
growing BAME population reaches retirement age, which may make
BAME pensioners even more vulnerable to scams. Does the Minister
agree that the Government also need to look into these related
and relevant BAME pension issues?
(Con)
I say to the noble Lord that the Government must look into these
matters. It is a great concern that people from BAME communities
should be disadvantaged in such a way, and we will certainly do
that.
(Con)
[V]
My Lords, most of the people who I meet who have suffered badly
from these scams are, surprisingly, older people who have always
been efficient and capable at dealing with their own affairs. Is
there any way that the Government can keep these people up to
date so that they know to avoid the scams that are currently
around?
(Con)
It is a great tragedy that these scammers are so clever and such
ruthless people. The Government passed legislation in 2015 making
it a requirement that all people take advice, and we have banned
cold calling, but there is a recognised need for more action to
address this issue. It is important that people take advice from
the Money and Pensions Service but I am sure that in the Project
Bloom activity more communication will come out to people. I hope
that this will help.
(LD) [V]
One recommendation in the report is to ensure that victims of
fraud are not liable for tax penalties. Will the DWP take that up
with HMRC? If HMRC also suffered from the fraud, would greater
protections be more forthcoming?
(Con)
I referred earlier to tax and the issues that people face as a
result of scams. As I said to the noble Baroness, Lady Warwick,
the Minister for Pensions is quite prepared to meet on this and
other issues, and I will extend that invitation to the noble
Baroness so she may raise her point.