- Work and Pensions
Committee publishes Government response to report on DWP and
coronavirus
- Committee Chair
writes to
Secretary of State to press for further action
The Work and Pensions Committee has today
published the Government response to its report DWP’s response to the
coronavirus outbreak.
The report, published in
June, made a number of recommendations about
supporting those claiming Universal Credit, as well as legacy
benefits and those with no recourse to public funds due to their
immigration status. It also made recommendations on the HSE and
called on the DWP to develop a strategy for dealing with the
effects of the economic downturn.
Committee Chair MP has now written to the Secretary of State Thérèse
Coffey MP to press the Department on a number of points not
addressed by the Government response.
Both the Government response and letter to the SoS are attached.
Rt Hon MP, Chair of the Work and Pensions Committee,
said: “We don’t necessarily expect the Government
immediately to accept every recommendation we make. But we do
expect that it will at least explain its position. This response
to our report leaves many questions unanswered.
In the course of our inquiry, we heard concerns that the
Government’s very welcome increases to some benefit rates would
be undermined by the benefit cap. Ministers assured us in April
that only a small number of people would be affected. In fact,
DWP’s own statistics show that 84,000 households were newly
capped between February and May this year.
The Secretary of State also assured the House in May that she
was looking very carefully at what could be done for people who
had mistakenly applied for Universal Credit and left themselves
worse off as a result. We recommended that the Government act
urgently to put this right. It now seems that nothing is going to
be done for these people. If that’s the case, the Government
should say so clearly, and explain why.
Just as importantly, there seems to be little acknowledgement
of the role of the Department in planning for future pressure on
the social security system. There needs to be a firm commitment
to analysing how coronavirus has affected levels of poverty and a
clear strategy—available for public scrutiny— for coordinating
the employment response to the economic downturn.”