Trade association UK and Ireland Fuel Distributors
Association (UKIFDA) has submitted its views on the government’s
‘Future Support for Low Carbon Heat’ and ‘Energy Efficiency in
Existing Homes’ consultations.
The Environmental Audit Committee launched its inquiry into
Energy Efficiency of Existing Homes in May and wanted views on
such things as the potential risks and opportunities
of bringing forward the government’s energy efficiency target, if
energy efficiency should be legislated for and how effective EPC
ratings are.
Whilst the Low Carbon Heat consultation called for views on
how the UK can achieve its net zero greenhouse gas emissions by
2050 – and the decarbonisation of heat is seen as among the
biggest challenges the government faces in meeting this climate
goal.
UKIFDA Chief Executive Guy Pulham comments: “We absolutely
agree that government support on energy efficiency measures is
required – both on and off-gas grid - that encourage consumers to
upgrade existing equipment, improve insulation and install smart
controls to better monitor energy usage and have been lobbying
the government on offering support for these measures. We believe
that these measures are vital in moving homes upwards through the
EPC ratings and thereby reducing emissions although care needs to
be taken that the disadvantaged, such as the fuel poor, are not
excluded.”
Commenting on the low carbon heat consultation UKIFDA
Technical Manager Tony Brown said: “Whilst we always welcome any
news on low carbon heat options and decarbonisation innovations,
we are disappointed there is no mention of liquid biofuels in
this consultation.
“It is clear from these and previous government
consultations that the focus is on heat pumps, which is a great
shame and a source of frustration for UKIFDA, our Members, and
the heating oil industry as a whole, as we believe liquid
biofuels can and should be part of the long-term solution and
therefore need to feature in future energy policies.
“Liquid biofuels offers a practical, affordable and
effective solution which addresses all of the government’s key
requirements: to keep energy bills low; cost effectively reduce
carbon emissions; ensure a secure, resilient energy supply; bring
economic benefits and avoid unreasonable upfront costs for
consumers.”
Guy Pulham adds: “Households are already dealing with the
financial strain caused by COVID-19 – and to impose further costs
now seems out of the reach for many off-grid homeowners.
“Instead of concentrating on expensive solutions such as
heat pumps that many households simply can’t afford, the
government needs to implement solutions in energy that are fair
to all households. With a competitive marketplace that has a
variety of energy options in place this would lower costs and
provide a variety of low carbon options for an array of needs and
budgets.
“Liquid biofuels offer an accessible, flexible solution for
many off-gas grid consumers, providing a low-cost and low carbon
heat option that matches the fabric of their buildings – and we
feel strongly that they should play a role in the future of
heating.
“Even with the proposed Clean Heat Grant mentioned in the
recent consultation and the energy saving vouchers announced by
the Chancellor in his summer statement, households face a big
initial outlay to make the energy efficiency improvements that
enable technologies like heat pumps to be retrofitted.
“The costs provided by BEIS in recent consultations do not
consider the additional expense for many households of making
improvements to the existing building fabric if they were to
install heat pumps. Furthermore, 97% of oil heated homes in Great
Britain are in the lowest EPC bands D-G, and rural consumers have
less disposable income and endure greater fuel poverty as
well.
“We would encourage government to consider a boiler
scrappage scheme as well as offering grants for insulation, new
windows etc. A government supported nationwide
scheme to replace older oil boilers with energy efficient
condensing boilers would both reduce heating bills whilst also
making a significant contribution to reducing CO2
emissions. These boilers could also be adapted in the future for
liquid biofuel.
“If oil heated households received the £4000 grant
announced by recently this would cover the cost of a new liquid
biofuel tank and condensing boiler for the average off grid home
and the advantage is there is no need for immediate improvements
to the fabric of the building to make it work. This way
homeowners can save emissions, reduce ongoing heating costs, and
then make further improvements if needed to the fabric of the
building at a later date but at a pace that suits their
pocket.
“It is only when the government is technology neutral that
the full potential of supporting consumers transitioning to low
carbon heat can be reached. Rather than just
focusing on certain elements of net zero, government should
encourage development of new technology in current
infrastructures rather than simply stating a ban from x
date.
“Whilst we understand the government’s position on not
wanting to encourage new oil boilers, a pathway for liquid
biofuels should be allowed to continue in the intermediate term
whilst alternative fuel is developed like that by main gas and
other sectors. It is clearly not right that sectors are not given
the same tolerance when product can be made available to reduce
the emissions and help meet government net zero targets.”