Today, Liberal Democrats will oppose the Government's Trade
Bill, having tabled an amendment which would prevent the
bill from progressing.
The Party is opposing the legislation not only on the grounds of
a lack of Parliamentary scrutiny, but it contains no underlying
principles that could form the basis of negotiations for future
trade deals. For example, issues such as environmental standards,
employment and animal welfare standards, or international
development goals are ignored.
Ahead of the Trade Bill's second reading, Liberal Democrat
Spokesperson for Business and Trade, , said:
"The passage of the Trade Bill today will give the
Government total freedom to make whatever trade deal they like,
with whomever they like, with no accountability. They are
trying to sneak through the legislation whilst they think no
one is looking.
"The passage of this bill will mean that MPs are denied scrutiny
of the UK’s future trade deals, leaving them with less power to
agree trade deals than MEPs had within the EU. Equally, there is
no mention of any national priorities for the basis of a future
trade deal, when climate requirements or employment and animal
welfare standards should be at the forefront of any
negotiation.
"The Liberal Democrats will continue to oppose this legislation
for as long as the Government continues to try and prevent
Parliament from playing an essential role in how future trade
deals are agreed. Until the Government ensures proper
accountability for Ministers and that our basic welfare standards
as well as climate requirements cannot be undermined, this
legislation is not fit for purpose."
ENDS
Notes to editors
The text of the amendment is as follows:
That this House declines to give a Second Reading to the Trade
Bill because the Bill fails to make provision for appropriate
parliamentary scrutiny, as under its provisions trade agreements
could not be debated nor would Parliament have the power to amend
them, provides no underlying principles created by
parliamentarians that could form the basis of negotiations on
environmental standards, employment and animal welfare standards,
international development goals and many others, fails to set
agreed national priorities in trade agreements, and includes no
details on a dispute resolution system, putting the UK Government
at risk of legal action should it refuse to open up areas of the
UK’s society and economy to private businesses, such as the the
agricultural industry or the National Health Service.