Extracts from oral questions (Commons) to the Cabinet Office: Brexit - May 4
EU Withdrawal Agreement: Covid-19 Wes Streeting (Ilford North)
(Lab) What assessment he has made of the effect of the covid-19
outbreak on the Government’s ability to implement and apply the
withdrawal agreement by 31 December 2020. [902098] Nick Fletcher
(Don Valley) (Con) What progress he has made in negotiations on the
UK’s future relationship with the EU. [902100] Allan Dorans (Ayr,
Carrick and Cumnock) (SNP) What recent progress the Government have
made...Request free trial
EU Withdrawal
Agreement: Covid-19
Wes Streeting (Ilford North) (Lab) What assessment he has made of the effect of the covid-19 outbreak on the Government’s ability to implement and apply the withdrawal agreement by 31 December 2020. [902098] Nick Fletcher (Don Valley) (Con) What progress he has made in negotiations on the UK’s future relationship with the EU. [902100] Allan Dorans (Ayr, Carrick and Cumnock) (SNP) What recent progress the Government have made on negotiating the UK’s future relationship with the EU. [902103] The Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and Minister for the Cabinet Office (Michael Gove) From 20 to 24 April, a full and constructive negotiating round took place, with a full range of discussions across all workstreams. Our next scheduled round of talks with our EU friends will take place in the week beginning 11 May. Everyone will understand that we have left the European Union and everyone will understand that the impact of covid-19 might have an impact on the timetable for negotiating our future relationship, so why will the Minister not give businesses the reassurance they need that if the Government need more time, they will take more time? Is it dogma; is it vanity; or is it paranoia? The hon. Gentleman provides a helpful list of conditions, but it is none of those. It is plain prudence. Were we to perpetuate our membership of the European Union-lite through the transition period, we would end up spending more taxpayers’ money, which could be spent on the NHS. We would have to accept new EU rules that might constrain our ability to fight covid-19 and to deal with other crises, and we would, of course, be unfortunately and unfairly trespassing on the EU’s need to concentrate on other vital priorities. Nick Fletcher [V] Can my right hon. Friend inform my constituents in Don Valley whether the covid-19 pandemic is likely to lead to an extension of the transition period? I can reassure my hon. Friend and the good people of Don Valley that the Government are not going to extend the transition period at the end of this year. Allan Dorans [V] Michel Barnier, the leader of the EU negotiating team, has expressed frustration that the UK’s negotiators seem happy to run down the clock on leaving the transition with no deal in place at the end of this year. We have already heard repeated warnings of the perils of a cliff-edge Brexit, which could be calamitous for the economy at a time when businesses are fragile and crave stability. Will the Chancellor of the Duchy do the right thing by ensuring that his party does not bring about this calamity? I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for raising this issue. There have been cordial conversations and negotiations between our negotiator David Frost and Michel Barnier, and I would not want to prejudice those by making any criticism of Michel Barnier, other than to say that he will negotiate hard on behalf of the Commission, but we will negotiate hard on behalf of the whole United Kingdom. Pete Wishart (Perth and North Perthshire) (SNP) [V] Is it not the case that what businesses want more than anything else is certainty that this Government will not do anything to compound the economic difficulties caused by this pandemic? The Government could not of course do anything to stop covid coming to our shores, but it is in their hands to stop further economic misery from a disastrous Brexit. Does the Minister agree that the last thing businesses need is more economic turbulence and that the certainty they seek is one that says there will be no no-deal Brexit and there will be an extension to let them recover from this pandemic?
I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for the point he makes. There
will not be a no-deal Brexit; we have a deal, and that deal was
legislated for in the House of Commons. I think he is right: it
is important that we give business certainty, and I think one of
the best ways of giving business certainty is recognising that we
respect referendums. That is why this House has voted to respect
the referendum that saw the British people take us out of the
European Union, and I would urge him and others to respect the
referendum that made it clear that the people of Scotland want to
stay in the United Kingdom, instead of having the damaging
uncertainty of an indyref2 hanging over future investment
decisions. Layla Moran (Oxford West and Abingdon) (LD) What recent discussions he has had with Cabinet colleagues on a potential extension to the transition period. [902132] The Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and Minister for the Cabinet Office (Michael Gove) As I think Members will appreciate given previous exchanges, the Government will not be extending the transition period. Indeed, Parliament has legislated to prevent Ministers from agreeing to such an extension. The Government will therefore continue to negotiate a new fair trade deal with the EU, the process of which will conclude by the end of December. Layla Moran [V] A YouGov poll released this weekend showed that half the population now think that the transition period should be extended, versus 35% who think the Government should press ahead. The public know that kicking the economy when it is down, especially with a no-deal Brexit on top of a covid crash, is in no one’s best interests. The right hon. Gentleman said just now that there was a deal, but he knows full well that that is the withdrawal agreement and not the future deal that will determine the trade relationship. No deal is still on the table, so will the Government consider asking for even a short extension to avoid a no-deal Brexit, or are they intent on putting ideology before pragmatism? This Government always put pragmatism and the interests of the British people first. The hon. Lady mentioned a YouGov poll. There was another poll, on 12 December last year; it was called a general election, and my right hon. Friend the Member for Uxbridge and South Ruislip (Boris Johnson) secured a majority in order to take this country out of the European Union on the basis of the deal that he negotiated. The Liberal Democrats took part in that poll. I cannot recall exactly how well they did, but it certainly the case that they were not entrusted by the British people with the discharge of policy on our relationship with the EU. |