Today the National Audit Office (NAO) reports that
the Ministry of Defence’s Equipment Plan (the Plan) is still
unaffordable, with the MoD estimating that costs will be £2.9
billion higher than its budget over
2019-2029.
The Plan sets out the MoD’s equipment and support
budget over the next 10 years. It includes spending on equipment
already in use and equipment in development. It accounts for 42%
of the MoD’s total spending, meaning stability of the wider
defence budget depends on effective management of the
Plan.
The Plan forecasts spending £183.6
billion on equipment and support costs over the next ten years,
against a £180.7 billion budget. These costs could vary, and in a
worst case scenario, should all the risks identified by the MoD
materialise, this gap could grow to £13
billion.
This is the third successive year that we have
concluded the Plan is unaffordable. Although the MoD’s reported
funding shortfall is less than last year, it is not possible to
directly compare the affordability gap over time as the
Department has presented it on a different basis to before. In
particular, it has made more optimistic judgments than last year,
which removed £7.8 billion costs from the Plan. In spite of this,
it is clear that the MoD faces more significant shortfalls over
the next five years – it estimates the shortfall is £6 billion up
to 2023-24 - and it now has less flexibility to respond to
short-term financial pressures.
The MoD is managing these financial pressures by
establishing tighter control of in-year expenditure and has
undertaken a detailed analysis of investment options. However, it
has again delayed the difficult decisions to make the Equipment
Plan affordable and determine its priorities on future major
capabilities. Its continued short-term focus on living within its
annual budget is increasingly leading to reduced capabilities.
For example, unless action is taken, MoD will lose existing
capabilities, such as the medical facilities provided by the
ship RFA Argus, during the period covered by the
Plan. Decisions to defer project expenditure are also reducing
value for money. For example, affordability-driven decisions to
delay the introduction of Protector (remotely piloted aircraft)
will increase costs by £187 million, plus a further
£50 million to retain existing equipment for
longer.
, the head of the NAO, said
today:
“The MoD has not made the necessary strategic
decisions to address the 10-year affordability gap and there is
evidence that its continued short-term focus on living within
annual budgets is increasingly affecting the Armed Forces’
ability to maintain and enhance the UK’s military capability. The
MoD needs to determine its strategic priorities so that it can
develop an affordable long-term programme of
investment.”
- ENDS
-
Notes for
Editors
-
The Equipment Plan covers large and complex
procurement projects including nuclear-deterrent submarines
(Dreadnought-class), global combat ships, new armoured vehicles
(Ajax) and Lightning II aircraft. It also includes a budget to
support new and in-service equipment, such as maintaining
Typhoon aircraft, and introducing modern information and
communications technology.
-
The Equipment Plan was introduced in
2012. At the request of the then Secretary of State, the NAO
provides Parliament with a commentary on the Plan when it is
published each year, and assesses the robustness of its
underlying assumptions. A link to the 2019-2029 Equipment Plan
published by the MoD can be found here.