HMI Prisons report on independent review of progress (IRP) at HMP Isle of Wight

Inspectors revisiting HMP Isle of Wight to review improvement following a full inspection last year found a mixed picture and assessed overall that progress was not good enough.

The training prison holds about 1,000 prisoners across two separate sites, almost all serving long sentences for sexual offences but with a small number on remand. At a full inspection in April–May 2019, its purposeful activity - education, training and work - was assessed as good, but outcomes for prisoners had declined, against the previous inspection in 2015, in the areas of safety and respect and continued not to be sufficiently good in rehabilitation and release planning. At an independent review of progress (IRP) in January 2020, inspectors reviewed progress against 11 key recommendations from the full inspection. 

Peter Clarke, HM Chief Inspector of Prisons, said: “Taken as a whole, progress had not been good enough in the majority of areas. There had been good progress in three, reasonable progress in two, insufficient progress in one and no meaningful progress in five areas.”

There was a significant difference between how work had progressed in areas local managers had responsibility for and those that required national support from HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS). 

Local managers had made reasonable or better progress in five out of seven recommendations. In the safety area, this included important work to determine the causes of violence and challenge or support individuals involved in violent incidents. Prison managers had also ensured that staff understood their roles and responsibilities in the event of a medical emergency. However, there continued to be significant weaknesses in the operation of the incentives and rewards policy.

In the area of respect, managers had worked well to improve systems for prisoners’ applications and redress. Social care had also been improved by the implementation of a Memorandum of Understanding with the local council. 

In rehabilitation and release planning, there had been some work to improve oversight of the department and train prison offender managers (POMs).

In contrast to the progress made by local managers, Mr Clarke said, “all four recommendations that required external support from HMPPS had been rejected and so no progress had been made.”

These included taking steps to ensure basic standards of decency by reducing overcrowding and ensuring all prisoners had access to a toilet overnight. “During this visit, we found that about 160 prisoners continued to live in overcrowded cells. In addition, most prisoners on the Albany site continued to live in cells without a toilet or sink. Instead they relied on night sanitation, an electronic system that allows prisoners out of their cells individually to use communal facilities overnight.” 

Mr Clarke continued: “Prisoners, including older and disabled people, were allowed seven minutes to use the facilities, which many said was not long enough. It was not uncommon for prisoners to face a wait of an hour. This meant that many resorted to using a bucket in their cell and effectively ‘slopping out’ in the morning. This was not an acceptable situation.” 

HMPPS rejected a recommendation intended to ensure sick prisoners were transferred to a mental health facility in line with national guidelines. Inspectors found that one patient who had been waiting too long for a hospital bed during the inspection was still waiting at the time of the IRP visit eight months later. HMPPS also rejected a recommendation that remand prisoners should be held at an establishment that could meet their needs. 

Overall, Mr Clarke said:

“This was a mixed review. Local managers had worked well and made progress in some important areas. However, HMPPS needs a change of approach to ensure accommodation meets basic standards and all prisoners receive appropriate support and health care.”

• End – 

Notes to editors

1.         The full Independent Review of Progress report, published on 14 February 2020, can be found on the HM Inspectorate of Prisons website at: www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmiprisons/inspections

2.         HM Inspectorate of Prisons is an independent inspectorate, inspecting places of detention to report on conditions and treatment, and promote positive outcomes for those detained and the public.

3.          HMP Isle of Wight is a training prison holding about 1,000 prisoners across two separate sites. Almost all of them were serving long sentences for sexual offences, but the prison was also used to hold a small remand population from the Isle of Wight. The prison was last inspected in April–May 2019.

4.          Independent Reviews of Progress (IRPs) are a new type of prison visit, which began in April 2019. They were developed because Ministers wanted an independent assessment of how far prisons had implemented HMI Prisons’ recommendations following particularly concerning prison inspections. IRPs are not inspections and do not result in new judgements against our healthy prison tests. Rather they judge progress being made against the key recommendations made at the previous inspection. The visits are announced and happen eight to 12 months after the original inspection. They last two and a half days and involve a comparatively small team. Reports are published within 25 working days of the end of the visit. We conduct 15 to 20 IRPs each year. HM Chief Inspector of Prisons selects sites for IRPs based on previous healthy prison test assessments and a range of other factors. For more on IRPs please see https://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmiprisons/about-hmi-prisons/independent-reviews-of-progress-irps/

5.          At this HMP Isle of Wight IRP visit we followed up 11 of the 35 recommendations made at our most recent inspection and made judgements about the degree of progress achieved to date. We judged that there was good progress in three recommendations, reasonable progress in two recommendations, insufficient progress in one recommendation and no meaningful progress in five recommendations. 

6.          A report on the most recent full inspection of HMP Isle of Wight is here - https://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmiprisons/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2019/08/Isle-of-Wight-Web-2019.pdf - with our media release here - https://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmiprisons/media/press-releases/2019/08/hmp-isle-of-wight-still-respectful-but-less-safe-with-weaknesses-in-release-and-rehabilitation-work/

7.          This IRP visit at HMP Isle of Wight took place between 7 and 9 January 2020.