is said to
be ready to reshuffle his ministerial team in
February – and
a new Institute for Government report warns that he should then
keep his ministers in place. Excessive ‘churn’ means they never
get properly on top of their brief. This has undermined the
effectiveness of UK government in recent decades.
The length of time a UK secretary of state stays in
the job is now closer to that of a football manager than a CEO in
the private sector, and almost a year shorter than the equivalent
in Germany. Longer tenures would provide continuity and give the
government the best chance of delivering on its most ambitious
promises such as ‘levelling up’ the country.
Government
Reshuffles sets out the
debilitating level of turnover in key roles and departments,
several of which have been particularly hard hit:
-
There have been 18 housing ministers since 1997,
despite successive governments’ stated aims to address the
housing crisis.
-
There have been six different work and pensions
secretaries in the last four years, a period in which the
government has tried to implement its ambitious Universal
Credit reforms.
-
is the
seventh justice secretary since 2010, with the constant
turnover at the Ministry of Justice coming at a time when
prisons have struggled to deal with rising
violence.
Ministers are often moved on just as they get to
grips with their role, and departments suffer constant changes in
direction. This has crippled efforts to deliver long-term reform
in areas where Johnson’s government is promising progress, such
as further education and industrial strategy.
While some ministerial moves are necessary or
unavoidable, the report argues that the prime minister
should:
-
Set an expectation that secretaries of state stay
in post for at least three years, and junior ministers for at
least two years.
-
Avoid frequent reshuffles.
-
Improve the process of ministerial handovers and
discourage constant policy reinvention.
Tom Sasse, IfG senior researcher and report author,
said:
“Playing musical chairs with the ministers in charge
of key public priorities is not a serious way to run the country.
It is disruptive, wasteful and hinders government efforts to
deliver the kind of long-term reforms needed to improve people’s
lives.
[the prime minister’s
senior adviser] is right to argue that civil servants need to
stay in their jobs longer and develop more expertise. The PM
should recognise that the same is true of
ministers.”