Progress in establishing a shale gas industry in England has been
slower than government planned, according to today’s report by the
National Audit Office (NAO).
Government has committed to developing a shale gas
industry in England amid public concern over the environmental
and public health risks from fracking. In response, the NAO has
reviewed the current landscape of hydraulic fracturing (fracking)
of shale gas in England.
The Department for Business, Energy and Industrial
Strategy (the Department) does not know how much shale gas can be
commercially extracted in the UK. In 2016, Cabinet Office
expected up to 20 fracked wells by mid-2020. Three wells have
been fracked to date.
The Department has encouraged operators to determine
the viability of the industry and introduced measures to support
the planning process. Operators have said the system to protect
against the risk of earthquakes is stricter than that used
internationally and has hindered their ability to develop the
industry.
The Department does not expect shale gas production
to lead to lower energy prices, but believes it could provide
greater energy security and have economic benefits. However, it
has not analysed the benefits or costs of supporting the shale
gas industry because it thinks this would not be meaningful due
to the current uncertainty about how much shale gas can be
extracted.
Public support for shale gas development is low and
has reduced over time.1 Concern has centred on
the risks to the environment and public health from greenhouse
gas emissions, groundwater pollution and fracking-induced
earthquakes, as well as the adequacy of existing regulations.
Government has told the NAO that it is confident the regulatory
regime can manage these risks. Regulators have so far focused on
the current exploratory stage and mainly rely on a system of
statutory self-reporting by the operator, which presents
risks.2 Should the industry ramp up to full
production quickly, the Environment Agency (EA) is confident it
can respond at pace.
The Department believes it can meet its climate
change objectives while developing shale gas, but it has not yet
developed the necessary technology. The Committee on Climate
Change states that the development of carbon capture, usage and
storage technology (CCUS) is critical to reducing greenhouse gas
emissions, because it would provide a way to use fossil fuels,
including shale gas, in a low-carbon way. The Department held two
unsuccessful competitions in 2007 and 2012 to develop and
implement CCUS. In 2018, it set out its aim to develop the first
CCUS facility in the mid-2020s.
Fracking has already placed financial pressures on
local bodies, including local authorities and police forces, and
other costs have been borne by a range of government departments
and regulators. The full costs of supporting fracking to date are
not known by the Department, but the NAO estimates that at least
£32.7 million has been spent by public bodies since 2011. This
includes £13.4 million spent by three local police forces on
maintaining the security around shale gas sites to
date.3
The Department recognises its responsibility for
decommissioning offshore oil and gas infrastructure, but not for
onshore wells, including shale gas wells.4 In
January 2019, the NAO reported that government is ultimately
liable for the total costs of decommissioning offshore
infrastructure that operators cannot
decommission.5 In March 2019, the Committee of
Public Accounts set out concerns about the Department’s
arrangements for ensuring the cost of decommissioning shale gas
wells do not fall to taxpayers.6
The Department says landowners may be liable for
decommissioning costs of shale gas wells should an operator be
unable to fund them, but arrangements are unclear and untested.
In May 2019, the Department informed the Committee of Public
Accounts that the EA could pursue operators and landowners under
the Environment Liability Directive and Environmental Damage
Regulations. However, in October 2019 the EA determined that it
is unable to use these powers to pursue insolvent operators and
landowners. The EA may be able to pursue landowners under other
statutory powers, but these are untested in the oil and gas
sector. The Department could not explain what would happen should
a landowner be unable to meet decommissioning
costs.
- ENDS
-
Notes for
Editors
-
The Department’s public attitudes survey shows the
opposition to shale gas has increased from 21% to 40% between
2013 and 2019.
-
Shale gas development in England is regulated by
three independent bodies: the Oil & Gas Authority (OGA),
the Environment Agency (EA) and the Health and Safety Executive
(HSE). They consult with other public bodies in carrying out
their functions, including the British Geological Survey (BGS),
Public Health England, and the Coal Authority.
-
This does not include all costs, such as judicial
reviews of planning applications or the time and expenses of
public servants.
-
There is no equivalent legislation that establishes
government liability for decommissioning onshore
wells.
-
National Audit Office report, January
2019: Oil and gas in the UK –
offshore decommissioning
-
Committee of Public Accounts report, March
2019: Public cost of
decommissioning oil and gas infrastructure